Swede
Well-known schlogga
If Christcuck god(any god) sends people to hell for trolling and shitposting he isn't worth worshiping
Religion tier list
- Thread starter LORD CHUDTEMANTE
- Start date
S
Spas
Guest
You can take that up with him, I have no intention of lowering myself to such inane talking points
Swede
Well-known schlogga
Christsisses when faced with a real argument
Here's mine; I didn't include all the religions, though
LORD CHUDTEMANTE
Well-known schlogga
I wonder why the pagans aren't the ones who conquered the world.
I
istanbul
Guest
Yeah I wonder why the jews were so successful at conquering the world
S
SoytanEnthusiast
Guest
FailquoteChristsisses when faced with a real argument
S
SoytanEnthusiast
Guest
>Posting on the schlog (no flags) so you can stop being Cuban
LORD CHUDTEMANTE
Well-known schlogga
I have never said this SFAW
S
SoytanEnthusiast
Guest
I'm not SFAW obsessed Cuban
You are oblivious to my meaning. Jewry only "conquered the world" when Christendom began to collapse with the spiritual degenerations of the nineteenth century and the earlier "Enlightenment" era. Read International Jew by Henry Ford, and you'll notice that Ford, an expert on the dealings of these folk, documents the takeover of the West by these people not at the highlights and triumphs of Christendom, but instead, only as early as Christendom's twilight in the eighteenth century, and the times within and following the Victorian era. The reign of rising Christianity within our governmental institutions was what kept Jewry at bay.
Nihilma
/caca/borean
I've not included all because I don't have the time to research them all one by one as of now, maybe I'll make a complete list once I'm done. Also, a lot of religion in "falsehood" and some even above, like some gnostics and some jews also practice sorcery to a degree, but those doing it are or were a minority and unlike those I put at the bottom didn't practice sorcery on a regular basis.
I put caodaism in abrahamic heresy because they consider Jesus a prophet but geg they're vietnamese, what the fuck happened there.
Also since I'm still on my own journey of research into christianity, I am not able to make definitive statements on different denominations
Jarty
Skajyos won
In other words, the university as a institution wouldn't exist if not for the catholic church. You don't think that's a big deal. And like all other anti-christians, you completely ignore that most advancements in the sciences, philosophy, and physics wouldn't exist if not for christianity, mainly the catholic church.
A
Aedra
Guest
Ecumenist tierlist doe.
Nihilma
/caca/borean
Not too long ago, the Eastern Orthodox and Lutheran churches made a common confession on the trinity where the lutheran Church basically abandonned the Filioque.
"Lutherans, together with many other Western Christians, now widely recognize that the addition of the Filioque to the Nicene Creed, which took place locally by a unilateral action of the Latin Church and without the action of an Ecumenical Council, was illegitimate and contributed to disunity among Christians. Moreover, many Lutherans are now convinced that the original Creed without the Filioque addition could and should be restored in their worship."
I get that ecumenism can be done very poorly, with in mind only finding a middle ground, which is bad, or in the case of Catholics, getting everyone to recognize the Pope, which is bad too.
I see ecumenism only as a dialogue to find the Truth, and as of now I don't see this fullness of truth in the Eastern Orthodox Church, but I recognize a lot of truth in it I did not have prior to my interest in this denomination.
Perhaps if you wanna talk about this let's switch to the christian general thread.
A
Aedra
Guest
I will simply say the dialogue you mention here is different from the type I condemn, because this one involves a different church accepting the Orthodox position on something, of course I am okay with that. It means the Lutherans partially abandoned some falsehood (long way to go though, because they need to abandon Lutheranism entirely and accept Orthodoxy). But the dialogue the Catholics attempt with the Orthodox is different. They want us to accept their view on things which will never happen. The only way I'm willing to engage in dialogue is if the other side is willing to accept our dogma without any compromise whatsoever. This is why the Patriarch of the Greek Church is in schism with Moscow. Because they (the greeks) are directly going against our canons in every way possible; scandal after scandal. If you believe something to be true then you will naturally want to defend its teachings to death. That is what I do.
Nihilma
/caca/borean
Ofc yeah I get your perspective, it makes complete sense.
I define ecumenism within Christianity as simply the search for the Truth period, without compromise.
I am not convinced that Eastern Orthodoxy = Truth, nor that any other denomination has the fullness of Truth, but yeah you know my position, I'm open to being proven wrong. I want to, even.
DonutHole
Grand Sage of Pork [#107C10] LOVER
A
Aedra
Guest
Then you essentially just redefined ecumenism to be something else entirely and you don't actually believe in it. Why feel the need to stick with the word if you don't actually believe what ecumenists preach?
Also, I'll leave a video for you in the general Christian thread so you can see for yourself how and why the Greek Church is subverted and why Moscow is right.
Similar threads
- Poll
