Brainstorm
Obsessed
Not a argumentyou're retarded
Not a argumentyou're retarded
The first paragraph is an exact copy of your last one. The nazis didn't collectivise industry. They relied on mass privatizations, with some party members using their position to create monopolies. They sometimes intervened in the economy for the sake of the military, but light interventionism is standard in Capitalism.they were a mix of socdem and fascist (right wing socialists.) the nazis did nationalize and colectivise all of the industry (fascist socialism.) but left some so that the german people would prosper and to not have any worrys of a jewish bolshevik revolution that would take advantage of the workers spite for the capitalist system then use them as pawns to overthrow tradittional europe (like what were seeing today in the west.) so fascism and fascists were right wing culturally to preserve there people and nations and left wing economicaly so that the fascist regime and its native peoples could prosper; They were doing this to prevent bolshevik-jewish takeover but to still give the people what they want (Socialism.) without the destruction of the peoples and nation and culture and a jewish takeover and how they would give socialism was through fascism and fascism would give the people what they want while stopping and preventing a radical jewish-bolshevik takeover and the destruction of evrope and the world (What we are seeing today do to them losing ww2.) Also we see the proof of them wanting and destroying and preventing bolshevism (Franco and the falange in spain, Mussolini and the fascists in italy, hitler and the nazis in germany,szalasi in hungary, ETC.) all prevented bolshevik-jewish takeovers by implenting fascism giving the people what they want (Socialism.) but still being right wing to defend their peoples and nations.)
no they did nationalise and collectivise some industry and socdems are socialists but not marxian socialists
>Muh commodity productionCorrect. The Nazis weren't socialist because they had commodity production and the value-form. That's all that's needed to prove that the Nazis weren't socialist.
socdems are socialists and the nazis did collectvise industryThe first paragraph is an exact copy of your last one. The nazis didn't collectivise industry. They relied on mass privatizations, with some party members using their position to create monopolies. They sometimes intervened in the economy for the sake of the military, but light interventionism is standard in Capitalism.
>socdems are socialists but not marxian socialists
They are not socialists. They started out as reformist socialists, but eventually gave up on the long term goals of socialism and embraced Keynesian Capitalism. Read up on the history of Social Democrats.
nazis were socialists just not marxian socialists but fascist socdemsCorrect. The Nazis weren't socialist because they had commodity production and the value-form. That's all that's needed to prove that the Nazis weren't socialist.
The Nazis did not own everything. They privatized large portions of the economy and even if that weren't true they would still be fundamentally capitalist. The Nazis had private property and every fundamental part of capitalism were applicable to them (law of value, free markets, finance capital, capitalist production, etc.)Not a argument View attachment 31900
Fascist theory be likeRead hitler.
blud forgor about mussolini's "the doctrine of fascism" and "the protocols of the elders of zion"Fascist theory be like
>Hitler's diary
>pamphlet
>/pol/ infographics
>4chan "effortposts"
Larpest lit thoughblud forgor about mussolini's "the doctrine of fascism" and "the protocols of the elders of zion"
blud forgor about mussolini's "the doctrine of fascism" and "the protocols of the elders of zion"Fascist theory be like
>Hitler's diary
>pamphlet
>/pol/ infographics
>4chan "effortposts"
marge?Larpest lit though
Larp literaturemarge?
IMOLike, say, you oppose capitalism because it causes decadence, degeneracy, and homosexuality. Would that be a right-wing reason to oppose capitalism?
ok imma hav to admit is issa trvkeLarp literature
i took the test and im auth left im still right wing culturally like you said im not actually left wing at allIMO
Left and right is economic, those who have culturally right wing views are most likely to be authoritarian than “right-wing”
Also:
LibLeft=ancom progressive pedocommietroon
LibUnity=anarchist niggerweed tranny
LibRight=pedocappietroon corporate-worshiping anarchist kike
RightUnity=ZOGbot magatard amerimutt (or social Darwinist Hierarchy Beast)
AuthRight=Trad Monarchist GOD
AuthUnity=Fascist/Nazi Aryan
AuthLeft=Tankie commie kike
LeftUnity=progressive SJW pedocommietroon
Centrist= I just wanna grill my fucking burgers for god’s sake
View attachment 32013
If I would take the political compass I would probably hit auth unity/right, I have culturally right wing views but I have mix feelings on both capitalism and socialismi took the test and im auth left im still right wing culturally like you said im not actually left wing at all
Ideologies are larp, they're all just liberalismIMO
Left and right is economic, those who have culturally right wing views are most likely to be authoritarian than “right-wing”
Also:
LibLeft=ancom progressive pedocommietroon
LibUnity=anarchist niggerweed tranny
LibRight=pedocappietroon corporate-worshiping anarchist kike
RightUnity=ZOGbot magatard amerimutt (or social Darwinist Hierarchy Beast)
AuthRight=Trad Monarchist GOD
AuthUnity=Fascist/Nazi Aryan
AuthLeft=Tankie commie kike
LeftUnity=progressive SJW pedocommietroon
Centrist= I just wanna grill my fucking burgers for god’s sake
View attachment 32013