lifesucksthenyoudie
(#E1E5F6)[#000000]lifesucksthenyoudie
>This is why I’m a Star Wars fan, no cap.
What gets me about this faggot is that he obviously puts himself on drugs before recording to get his reaction. Even the largest amount of soy you can imagine cannot generate this level of emotion naturally. He puts himself on drugs so you can consoom him consooming Disney.>This is why I’m a Star Wars fan, no cap.
Yeah, he said in the video he had a mimosa and a daquiri, although I feel he might've drank more than thatWhat gets me about this faggot is that he obviously puts himself on drugs before recording to get his reaction. Even the largest amount of soy you can imagine cannot generate this level of emotion naturally. He puts himself on drugs so you can consoom him consooming Disney.
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO BREAK CONSENT LAWS EVEN THOUGH THAT WILL LEAD TO A SLIPPERY SLOPE INTO RAMPANT PEDOPHILIA SHE'S A HECCIN' SENIOR IF SHE ISN'T A CHILD SHE'S A ROAASTIIEEE STUPID MAPHOBIC CHU-AAAAAAAAACCCCCCCKKKKK>NOOO you have to date 30 year old feminists with no eggs dude
>she's 17 years and 364 days you sick fuck she's a literal CHILD and can't make rational decisions
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO BREAK CONSENT LAWS EVEN THOUGH THAT WILL LEAD TO A SLIPPERY SLOPE INTO RAMPANT PEDOPHILIA SHE'S A HECCIN' SENIOR IF SHE ISN'T A CHILD SHE'S A ROAASTIIEEE STUPID MAPHOBIC CHU-AAAAAAAAACCCCCCCKKKKK
View attachment 2048
That’s a lot of text that I didn’t read>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO BREAK CONSENT LAWS EVEN THOUGH THAT WILL LEAD TO A SLIPPERY SLOPE INTO RAMPANT PEDOPHILIA SHE'S A HECCIN' SENIOR IF SHE ISN'T A CHILD SHE'S A ROAASTIIEEE STUPID MAPHOBIC CHU-AAAAAAAAACCCCCCCKKKKK
View attachment 2048
Think about it. I believe the process would go like this.
- Not everything is a "slippery slope" you retarded faggot.
Good, child marriages shouldn't even be legal. Not everything old is le good. Pedophile apologist.2. That's not where the main slippery slope has been going, for the past 2 centuries the entire West has been dramatically rising their AoC laws
Where? Rome?like societies before ours did preceeding their fall.
That's a pretty cool persecution fetish you have there. Almost every state, dems and republicans alike, have passed laws saying 16 yrs and 20 yrs together is completely okay.3. Trannies, feminists, and soyboys are the ones constantly starting drama about the "poor little girl being just 17" and even dating 20 year is olds is "creepy" now.
Absolutely no one cares what you do.That’s a lot of text that I didn’t read
>wordswordswordsThink about it. I believe the process would go like this.
>oh my science stupid chud, she's basically legal! 17 should be ok!
<fine, this will be an exception
>oh my science, stupid chud! If someone can date 17 year olds what's wrong with dating 16 year olds!
And it continues.
Good, child marriages shouldn't even be legal. Not everything old is le good. Pedophile apologist.
Where? Rome?
That's a pretty cool persecution fetish you have there. Almost every state, dems and republicans alike, have passed laws saying 16 yrs and 20 yrs together is completely okay.
And the people that do moralfag like this are on all sides of the political spectrum. Don't try and make pedophilia based and trad, faggot.
I had no idea Edward Dutton posted on a soyjak forum.I find men with aspergers and an approximation of morality instilled by normie neuroses and popular perception of law to be among the most interesting specimens, right alongside autistic libertarians. The noble autistic desire for truth and strict adherence to principles creates strong reactions to infractions that the typical normie doesn't have. Normies are not equipped to defend the society they rely upon.
I agree with your general idea but I don't get the obsession with the age 18 in particular. Seems too arbitrary. Don't get me wrong doe, I'm not defending pedophilia in any way.Think about it. I believe the process would go like this.
>oh my science stupid chud, she's basically legal! 17 should be ok!
<fine, this will be an exception
>oh my science, stupid chud! If someone can date 17 year olds what's wrong with dating 16 year olds!
Because he worships the word of his government.I agree with your general idea but I don't get the obsession with the age 18 in particular. Seems too arbitrary.
It's the best general AOC we have had that's worked so far.I agree with your general idea but I don't get the obsession with the age 18 in particular. Seems too arbitrary.
I agree between teenagers, but adults have a right to choice.At the end of the day, none of this shit matters because as long as people are having sex outside of marriage, there will be degeneracy. I'd say anything from 15 to 18 as age of consent would be fine but what matters more than aoc is that sex outside of marriage should be absolutely illegal. I don't and will never support a system that supposedly cares about le morals when it comes to children but allows them to "experiment" between each other. That's beyond cucked.
Then don't complain when your white women exercise their "right" to get blacked bro.I agree between teenagers, but adults have a right to choice.
If we're the superior race(we are) it shouldn't be a problem. And once the international Jew is gotten rid of white women won't be brainwashed.Then don't complain when your white women exercise their "right" to get blacked bro.
It's their right and as long as my NAP or basic laws have not been broken, no government should have the ability to get involved. Just like with other nicely-worded mandates with supposedly good intentions, ex. the Patriot act, it's going to give corrupt people an excuse to spy on and manipulate innocent people.Anyway fuck no I don't care for anyone's hecking rights on this matter, people who commit fornication and/or adultery should be severely punished.
The superior race in action :If we're the superior race(we are) it shouldn't be a problem.
I don't deny that jews are a factor but you people who scream "da jooz" at everything that goes wrong are ridiculous, you're taking away responsibility from women and pinning it on some imaginary external enemy just because you can't cope with the fact that your women are whores. Which is what they are : whores. I'd take marriage with any African woman over any of your disease ridden disgusting women who fuck dogs.And once the international Jew is gotten rid of white women won't be brainwashed.
Enough about man's rights over his life, let's talk about God's rights over man's life.It's their right
>degeneracy shouldn't be illegal because freedom or somethingand as long as my NAP or basic laws have not been broken, no government should have the ability to get involved. Just like with other nicely-worded mandates with supposedly good intentions, ex. the Patriot act, it's going to give corrupt people an excuse to spy on and manipulate innocent people.
In fact, the government intervening with marriage on a large scale arguably ruined it. All the tax breaks, prenups, and other laws relating to it have gotten rid of the main purpose of marriage, and set up entire institutions(domestic law) based off of deciding the spoils of the victor(s) in divorce, ruining it even further.
Fell for americanism heresy award. But I shouldn't be surprised at this point considering the amount of secular bullshit you typed out.Church should always be separated from the state, and the state should be minimized.
They aren't mutually exclusive.TLDR: Focus on changing the culture, not the law, that's short-sighted and not good for anyone besides the elite.