Serious General christian thread

Designates a thread as a serious discussion
I will do everything I can to convince him to stop, but there shouldn't be a law made against it. I already told you how it affects normal people as well.
There were laws against it for the vast majority of Christian history though. I don't understand this over-attachment to the concept of freedom Americans have. In Russia or even Turkey people simply don't care, because there are times when you must put the collective above the individual. Not saying you should always do that though because that's more akin to east asian cultures which are as hellish as a purely individualistic culture is. There should be a balance, western culture is overly individualistic and narcissistic, while east asian sinosphere cultures are overly collectivist and super harsh on anyone who dares to stand out. Orthodox culture is something in between.
I am not 'letting anyone' either, at least not letting them to the degree I can without committing a crime.
That's fine.
I agree, but we don't have a perfect monarch or government that can represent us best, besides God himself. For now, the best thing, and I've learned this from experience, is to encourage and be tough when someone is doing something detrimental to themselves.
That's fine too, no disagreement there.
Well, r/TodayIlearned! I don't have a lot of Georgian friends(think Belarus, Ukraine and Central Asia) and all Georgians I've met on the internet hate Russia with a passion.
Well, most Georgians obviously don't know any English, the ones you meet on the internet most certainly don't represent the average Georgian, not even close to it. That's why I wanna go there myself at some point, the border is always open anyway.
I don't think we understand each other. I don't like the term Westoid because it refers to the person as an individual instead of the religion they believe in. Refer to them as 'Protfags' and 'Catholicucks' instead.
That.. Would make sense if you weren't saying "le niggers" without any regret and wanting to genocide them all. I mostly wanted to pull the conversation in this direction because it's something I wanted to talk about. Racism is genuinely just incompatible with Orthodoxy, idk how you feel right being like that.

For the record, I may say "haha le westoid cumskin bla bla bla" often but I'm not actually racist. It's mostly just casual speak to sound edgy but I don't have anything against whites or any race for that matter. Let's talk about the whole race thing, I'll start you off with a simple question : if a black man is Orthodox, is he also included in your TND agenda?
 
There were laws against it for the vast majority of Christian history though. I don't understand this over-attachment to the concept of freedom Americans have. In Russia or even Turkey people simply don't care, because there are times when you must put the collective above the individual. Not saying you should always do that though because that's more akin to east asian cultures which are as hellish as a purely individualistic culture is. There should be a balance, western culture is overly individualistic and narcissistic, while east asian sinosphere cultures are overly collectivist and super harsh on anyone who dares to stand out. Orthodox culture is something in between.
Except in this case we're putting the individual above the collective if we make a law against it.
Well, most Georgians obviously don't know any English, the ones you meet on the internet most certainly don't represent the average Georgian, not even close to it. That's why I wanna go there myself at some point, the border is always open anyway.
True.
That would make sense if you weren't saying "le niggers" without any regret and wanting to genocide them all.
Not all, just most.
I mostly wanted to pull the conversation in this direction because it's something I wanted to talk about. Racism is genuinely just incompatible with Orthodoxy, idk how you feel right being like that.
Simply based off of culture, it is, like when you were referencing that whole dispute between the Bulgarian and Greek clergy, if I remember, that resulted in racism in that respect being le heckin' bad. but I'm racist based off of science.
For the record, I may say "haha le westoid cumskin bla bla bla" often but I'm not actually racist. It's mostly just casual speak to sound edgy but I don't have anything against whites or any race for that matter.
Interesting.
Let's talk about the whole race thing, I'll start you off with a simple question : if a black man is Orthodox, is he also included in your TND agenda?
I genuinely think most niggers are too retarded to be true Christians, so I'd be skeptical and investigate him in his moral values.

Not to mention, I don't want to go out of my way to kill all niggers, I just want the white race to breeeeed and not be plagued with the eternal Jew and shitskins migrating to white countries and shitting them up.
 
Honestly this whole homosexual union being allowed as a purely secular formality or not in secular countries is part of a bigger debate on how God's justice works on earth, and how the Church plays a role in it or not.
I don't think we'll ever reach a consensus in here, but it'd be nice if the discussion could end without anathemas being thrown around
 
I genuinely think most niggers are too retarded to be true Christians, so I'd be skeptical and investigate him in his moral values.

Not to mention, I don't want to go out of my way to kill all niggers, I just want the white race to breeeeed and not be plagued with the eternal Jew and shitskins migrating to white countries and shitting them up.
To a degree it really does sadden me to hear this.
I give money every month to a christian charity called open doors, which hosts on it's website a map of christian persecussion in the whole world, for each year, and the places were christians are the most persecuted always consistently are muslim countries and communist ones.
There are stories of african and middle eastern christians suffering the worst kind of hell and remaining strong and true in faith, and not only enduring suffering but using their suffering to spread the gospel even further.

You talk about them as shitskins, I don't know that God would ever see them as "shitskins"
 
Here's their website
1714760525133.png

First is obviously North Korea, with christians there risking public executions for owning bibles even, then Somalia, one of the most violent and chaotic nation in the world currently, et cetera.
But ig when the map will get updated in 2025, this will also most likely change, with the Sahel being currently in a raging chaos.
Sudan is number 8 but it'll get bumped a few scales I think, and Mali will skyrocket too
 
To a degree it really does sadden me to hear this.
I give money every month to a christian charity called open doors, which hosts on it's website a map of christian persecussion in the whole world, for each year, and the places were christians are the most persecuted always consistently are muslim countries and communist ones.
There are stories of african and middle eastern christians suffering the worst kind of hell and remaining strong and true in faith, and not only enduring suffering but using their suffering to spread the gospel even further.
And here's where my point lies. Most Africans are mudslime niggers or follow some shitty folk religion, and persecute the good ones(Christians), although the Catholic Africans do some fucked up shit. They and the Muslims are committing war crimes against each other right now. And since most African Christians are Catholic, well...
You talk about them as shitskins, I don't know that God would ever see them as "shitskins"
I'm only talking ill of the bad ones.
 
And here's where my point lies. Most Africans are mudslime niggers or follow some shitty folk religion, and persecute the good ones(Christians), although the Catholic Africans do some fucked up shit. They and the Muslims are committing war crimes against each other right now. And since most African Christians are Catholic, well...

I'm only talking ill of the bad ones.
Yeah but then I don't think you understand that racism is a theory of "genes", not "a generality".
Meaning that if you are of a certain colour of skin or descendant of a certain people, you HAVE this gene which renders you inferior or "forces" you to be and act a certain way.
If these people can be better christians than us, this theory literally falls apart.

We already talked about this btw, and there has been a lot of stories of muslim extremists converting to christianity after making christians suffer the most, as Paul did, which is the most prolific writer among the apostles.
It's not their genes that are wrong, it's their culture. Saul of Tarsis grew with the priests of the temple and was to become a top member of the rabbinic cast at the time. One of the biggest persecussioner of christians at the time. Comparable if not worse than modern muslims.
And he became one of the most iconic apostles
 
Except in this case we're putting the individual above the collective.
Even though we aren't supposed to do that.. Okay then, you do you.
Not all, just most.
You are judging every African on earth based on the limited experience you had with American blacks. You're being extremely unfair man.
Simply based off of culture, it is, like when you were referencing that whole dispute between the Bulgarian and Greek clergy, if I remember, that resulted in racism in that respect being le heckin' bad. but I'm racist based off of science.
I don't care about what science says, we are discussing this on the grounds of Holy Orthodoxy. You cannot point to a single Orthodox saint or leader who approved of racism. But I can point to many who spoke out against it. Including Saint Tikhon of Moscow, the First Patriarch of the Russian Church right after the fall of the Russian Empire. That's what matters. And since you mentioned science, I am assuming you believe in evolution too? Let's talk about that aswell.
I genuinely think most niggers are too retarded to be true Christians, so I'd be skeptical and investigate him in his moral values.

Not to mention, I don't want to go out of my way to kill all niggers, I just want the white race to breeeeed and not be plagued with the eternal Jew and shitskins migrating to white countries and shitting them up.
Okay. So did you know there are estimated to be almost 1 million Orthodox Christians in Kenya? And there are missions constantly being sent into Africa with the intent of converting Africans to Orthodoxy. Due to Communism, Eastern Orthodoxy only managed to enter Africa in the late 1990's, but we grew extremely fast there in this short amount of time. They are your brothers in faith, whether you like it or not. I don't mean to say this in a rude or condescending manner, I am merely saying that's how it is, those Orthodox Kenyans are our brothers. Does your TND idea apply to them too or are they exempt from it?

As for the whole wanting white race to breed thing, I am fully with you in the same way I'd be with any race on that one. I am against mass immigration too. The mistake you make is assuming I am some subverter pushing for the liberal idea of race. I am not. I fully approve of xenophobia, that is, not wanting people who are incompatible with your culture in your country. But that doesn't mean racism is fine. I will say I'm more interested in seeing Orthodox Christians in general make more children, not just one race.
 
You are judging every African on earth based on the limited experience you had with American blacks. You're being extremely unfair man.
This is the one problem I have with mutts.
It seems like they generalize to the whole world their american experience, but ig that's because their soft power overpowers the softpower of other nations, and thus mutt don't see another side to reality than to their own, where as we have both our own and theirs, usually
 
Yeah but then I don't think you understand that racism is a theory of "genes", not "a generality".
Meaning that if you are of a certain colour of skin or descendant of a certain people, you HAVE this gene which renders you inferior or "forces" you to be and act a certain way.
If these people can be better christians than us, this theory literally falls apart.
Well genes are based off of probability, you know.

I think nonwhites have a higher probability of being inferior, therefore when referring to the entire populations compared, I am being racist. However, equal nonwhites CAN exist, I just believe it is much less common.
We already talked about this btw, and there has been a lot of stories of muslim extremists converting to christianity after making christians suffer the most, as Paul did, which is the most prolific writer among the apostles.
It's not their genes that are wrong, it's their culture.
I've already proven to you that genetics make African people more likely to be more violent. Paul did not have this affliction.
 
Well genes are based off of probability, you know.

I think nonwhites have a higher probability of being inferior, therefore when referring to the entire populations compared, I am being racist. However, equal nonwhites CAN exist, I just believe it is much less common.
Again, that's not how racism works.
The concepts of inferiority in classical racist theory was that, for example due to the difference in cranial size and shape, and linked to the skin colour, the whole of the race had on top of these features the "inferiority" gene. Meaning that if you had a black skin, you were of a race which automatically and systematically had a genetic trait of inferiority.
Again, this would imply EVERY black person to be inferior.
It doesn't make sense.
I've already proven to you that genetics make African people more likely to be more violent. Paul did not have this affliction.*
No, you proved to me that blacks today commit more crime than whites, you did not prove to me that this was genetical.
If you want, we can go back a few hundred years ago to the medieval era, compare medieval france during the 100 years war with england to medieval egypt, and we'll see if those statistics hold true.
If you want we can also go to the ottoman empire pre-WWI and look at the crime statistics there.
Or better yet we can go to the roman era and look at which province of the roman empire was the more violent and which was the most peaceful, and then we'll make the same assumption on race
 
Even though we aren't supposed to do that.. Okay then, you do you.
No, I'm saying you're doing that by making a law meant for a small marginalized group that can be enforced upon EVERYONE through corruption.
You are judging every African on earth based on the limited experience you had with American blacks. You're being extremely unfair man.
Africa's even more violent, unless you want to blame everything on muh coloniulism this point falls flat.
I don't care about what science says, we are discussing this on the grounds of Holy Orthodoxy. You cannot point to a single Orthodox saint or leader who approved of racism. But I can point to many who spoke out against it. Including Saint Tikhon of Moscow, the First Patriarch of the Russian Church right after the fall of the Russian Empire.
We've already talked about the history of the Orthodox church. They rightfully approved of the conquests of the uncivilized mongoloid peoples in Central Asia and the far East.
That's what matters. And since you mentioned science, I am assuming you believe in evolution too? Let's talk about that aswell.
I'm a believer of intelligent design, so I believe in Adam and Eve and all of that. For now, evolution is the best explanation scientists can give with the technology they have.
Okay. So did you know there are estimated to be almost 1 million Orthodox Christians in Kenya? And there are missions constantly being sent into Africa with the intent of converting Africans to Orthodoxy. Due to Communism, Eastern Orthodoxy only managed to enter Africa in the late 1990's, but we grew extremely fast there in this short amount of time. They are your brothers in faith, whether you like it or not. I don't mean to say this in a rude or condescending manner, I am merely saying that's how it is, those Orthodox Kenyans are our brothers. Does your TND idea apply to them too or are they exempt from it?
As said I will question their morals and actions.
As for the whole wanting white race to breed thing, I am fully with you in the same way I'd be with any race on that one. I am against mass immigration too. The mistake you make is assuming I am some subverter pushing for the liberal idea of race. I am not. I fully approve of xenophobia, that is, not wanting people who are incompatible with your culture in your country.
Very good.
But that doesn't mean racism is fine. I will say I'm more interested in seeing Orthodox Christians in general make more children, not just one race.
Ethnicity and race are tied to culture on a general scale whether you like it or not.
 
No, I'm saying you're doing that by making a law meant for a small marginalized group that can be enforced upon EVERYONE through corruption.
I don't really understand what you mean here tbh, let's just agree to disagree on this one.
Africa's even more violent, unless you want to blame everything on muh coloniulism this point falls flat.
Ethiopia had civilization when Northern Europeans were too busy chimping out on a tundra with their shitty hail odin religion and being ooga booga. Not all of the historical big picture fits into your view. For me the reason Africa was historically not as developed is simple, because they did not have the correct cultural ingredients, the most important one being a proper religion. Ethiopia had Christianity since the 4th century and preserved it for over a thousand years, fighting off all sorts of invaders, pagan, muslim and even fucking catholics who wanted to forcefully change their denomination. And then finally they fought off the Italians with Russian help. Rome rose, and they were there. Rome fell and they were STILL there. What other proof do you need that they are plenty capable of civilization as long as they have God?
We've already talked about the history of the Orthodox church. They rightfully approved of the conquests of the uncivilized mongoloid peoples in Central Asia and the far East.
They fought them because they were not Orthodox.. Not due to their race. Russia conquered Poland too for that matter, are Poles also subhuman then? No, they fought the Poles because the Poles were Catholics who were threatening Orthodoxy, same as those central asians.
I'm a believer of intelligent design, so I believe in Adam and Eve and all of that. For now, evolution is the best explanation scientists can give with the technology they have.
Two questions :
1. How old is the earth in your view? Young earth or old earth?
2. Do you believe in macro evolution?
Ethnicity and race are tied to culture on a general scale whether you like it or not.
Maybe a bit. But what matters more is the upbringing and such. There's a historical community of Blacks in Turkey who have assimilated into Turkish culture. They are called Afro-Turks. They are extremely different compared to any other black you know, I assure you.
 
There'a a black guy from turkey who was working at kebab store. he died. He was shot by white man with big dick. He wakes up in isekai world and joins guild. The guild consists of 2 females and a male. The male is greek. After while, greek man has sex with two girls and Aedra is kicked out. Aedra joins another party and gets cuckholded by white man.
 
Again, that's not how racism works.
The concepts of inferiority in classical racist theory was that, for example due to the difference in cranial size and shape, and linked to the skin colour, the whole of the race had on top of these features the "inferiority" gene. Meaning that if you had a black skin, you were of a race which automatically and systematically had a genetic trait of inferiority.
Again, this would imply EVERY black person to be inferior.
It doesn't make sense.
This is pedantry and simply not true. You're confusing racism with racialism. I hold a mix of those beliefs.
No, you proved to me that blacks today commit more crime than whites, you did not prove to me that this was genetical.
You sure about that?
If you want, we can go back a few hundred years ago to the medieval era, compare medieval france during the 100 years war with england to medieval egypt, and we'll see if those statistics hold true.
The Egyptians killed their pharaohs and each other based on how well the crops were growing and the river was flowing.
If you want we can also go to the ottoman empire pre-WWI and look at the crime statistics there.
The Ottomans were a disgusting and despicable empire. They were much worse than Europeans.
Or better yet we can go to the roman era and look at which province of the roman empire was the more violent and which was the most peaceful, and then we'll make the same assumption on race
I'm not a Romaboo, so I'm guessing it's going to be Carthage?
Ethiopia had civilization when Northern Europeans were too busy chimping out on a tundra with their shitty hail odin religion and being ooga booga. Not all of the historical big picture fits into your view. For me the reason Africa was historically not as developed is simple, because they did not have the correct cultural ingredients, the most important one being a proper religion. Ethiopia had Christianity since the 4th century and preserved it for over a thousand years, fighting off all sorts of invaders, pagan, muslim and even fucking catholics who wanted to forcefully change their denomination. And then finally they fought off the Italians with Russian help. Rome rose, and they were there. Rome fell and they were STILL there. What other proof do you need that they are plenty capable of civilization as long as they have God?
Whatever, Ethiopians still had a monarchy which I don't like, but that's not the point I guess. The average IQ of Ethiopia is 63, and I don't believe might is the sole determinant of what's right. But look at what was attempted in India by the Orthodox, for example. Imagine trying to convince the Australian aboriginals to convert and form a society. There are some races that simply cannot function on the same level on average.
Russia conquered Poland too for that matter, are Poles also subhuman then? No, they fought the Poles because the Poles were Catholics who were threatening Orthodoxy,
Not true, Poles and Russians are ethnic enemies, since the Poles betrayed us by adopting a Latin script and fighting for the Germans. I would forgive my Slavic brothers any day though.
Two questions :
1. How old is the earth in your view? Young earth or old earth?
All I know is that it's older than 7,500 years, considering ancient Sumer predates 7,500 years. Not to mention the many neolithic tribes.
2. Do you believe in macro evolution?
I'm sure new species can develop on Earth, I'm just opposed to atheists about where the first animals originated.
Maybe a bit. But what matters more is the upbringing and such. There's a historical community of Blacks in Turkey who have assimilated into Turkish culture. They are called Afro-Turks. They are extremely different compared to any other black you know, I assure you.
Okay, let's consider you're right. Isn't the fact that Christianity was adopted in Europe and not adopted in Africa(Christianity started right in the middle, in fact closer to Africa) indicative of the white man being better able to grasp the concept of, understand, and align with a good God? Doesn't that imply as a whole, the white race is better?
 
I don't really understand what you mean here tbh, let's just agree to disagree on this one.

Ethiopia had civilization when Northern Europeans were too busy chimping out on a tundra with their shitty hail odin religion and being ooga booga. Not all of the historical big picture fits into your view. For me the reason Africa was historically not as developed is simple, because they did not have the correct cultural ingredients, the most important one being a proper religion. Ethiopia had Christianity since the 4th century and preserved it for over a thousand years, fighting off all sorts of invaders, pagan, muslim and even fucking catholics who wanted to forcefully change their denomination. And then finally they fought off the Italians with Russian help. Rome rose, and they were there. Rome fell and they were STILL there. What other proof do you need that they are plenty capable of civilization as long as they have God?

They fought them because they were not Orthodox.. Not due to their race. Russia conquered Poland too for that matter, are Poles also subhuman then? No, they fought the Poles because the Poles were Catholics who were threatening Orthodoxy, same as those central asians.

Two questions :
1. How old is the earth in your view? Young earth or old earth?
2. Do you believe in macro evolution?

Maybe a bit. But what matters more is the upbringing and such. There's a historical community of Blacks in Turkey who have assimilated into Turkish culture. They are called Afro-Turks. They are extremely different compared to any other black you know, I assure you.
What are your answers to the 2 questions?
 
This is pedantry and simply not true. You're confusing racism with racialism. I hold a mix of those beliefs.

You sure about that?

The Egyptians killed their pharaohs and each other based on how well the crops were growing and the river was flowing.

The Ottomans were a disgusting and despicable empire. They were much worse than Europeans.

I'm not a Romaboo, so I'm guessing it's going to be Carthage?

Whatever, Ethiopians still had a monarchy which I don't like, but that's not the point I guess. The average IQ of Ethiopia is 63, and I don't believe might is the sole determinant of what's right. But look at what was attempted in India by the Orthodox, for example. Imagine trying to convince the Australian aboriginals to convert and form a society. There are some races that simply cannot function on the same level on average.

Not true, Poles and Russians are ethnic enemies, since the Poles betrayed us by adopting a Latin script and fighting for the Germans. I would forgive my Slavic brothers any day though.

All I know is that it's older than 7,500 years, considering ancient Sumer predates 7,500 years. Not to mention the many neolithic tribes.

I'm sure new species can develop on Earth, I'm just opposed to atheists about where the first animals originated.

Okay, let's consider you're right. Isn't the fact that Christianity was adopted in Europe and not adopted in Africa(Christianity started right in the middle, in fact closer to Africa) indicative of the white man being better able to grasp the concept of, understand, and align with a good God? Doesn't that imply as a whole, the white race is better?
No it's not pedantry, racism is a consequence of racialism and as I just said, it doesn't make sense.
On the MAOA gene, first of all I'm not going to pay 40 bucks to read the entire article, I would've if it was free but oh well.

Second of all, from my research, close to as much racially japanese people possess the MAOA gene as black people do, meaning around 50%, yet japan consistently ranks in one of the lowest scores of criminality in the world. How do you explain that if not by culture ?

Egyptians did that ? Ever heard of the french revolution, were a king was beheaded for similar reasons ? The french have fought the most wars, have won the most battles with 1115 battles won, and used to be considered a warmongering state and people.
To answer your question about the ancient world, no, it wasn't Carthage, as carthage was mostly a farming land and was very peaceful.
Gaul and germania likely were, as there was constant fighting with barbaric tribes, and the gauls were also warmongering psychos.
 
No it's not pedantry, racism is a consequence of racialism and as I just said, it doesn't make sense.
On the MAOA gene, first of all I'm not going to pay 40 bucks to read the entire article, I would've if it was free but oh well.

Second of all, from my research, close to as much racially japanese people possess the MAOA gene as black people do, meaning around 50%, yet japan consistently ranks in one of the lowest scores of criminality in the world. How do you explain that if not by culture ?

Egyptians did that ? Ever heard of the french revolution, were a king was beheaded for similar reasons ? The french have fought the most wars, have won the most battles with 1115 battles won, and used to be considered a warmongering state and people.
To answer your question about the ancient world, no, it wasn't Carthage, as carthage was mostly a farming land and was very peaceful.
Gaul and germania likely were, as there was constant fighting with barbaric tribes, and the gauls were also warmongering psychos.
Barbarians won
 
Whatever, Ethiopians still had a monarchy which I don't like, but that's not the point I guess. The average IQ of Ethiopia is 63, and I don't believe might is the sole determinant of what's right. But look at what was attempted in India by the Orthodox, for example. Imagine trying to convince the Australian aboriginals to convert and form a society. There are some races that simply cannot function on the same level on average.
Funny you should mention not liking monarchy. Did you know the Patriarch of the Georgian Orthodox Church is currently pushing for a constitutional monarchy in Georgia? How do you reconcile not liking monarchy with the fact that a patriarch of your own faith is pushing for it? Or how about the fact that Tsar Nicholas II is a saint in the church?

As for IQ... I genuinely just don't care, IQ is often tested with western bias, if I sent you to Ethiopia then you'd be the silly one from their perspective. Ask yourself : can you do the kinds of menial work they do every day in rural areas? Most westerners have no idea what living in such conditions is like. They may lack skills you value, but you also lack skills they value. We should all humble ourselves in my opinion.
Not true, Poles and Russians are ethnic enemies, since the Poles betrayed us by adopting a Latin script and fighting for the Germans. I would forgive my Slavic brothers any day though.
Which one do you prefer : an Orthodox African man or a Catholic Pole? If you answer by picking the Pole then isn't that just... Putting race above religion?
All I know is that it's older than 7,500 years, considering ancient Sumer predates 7,500 years. Not to mention the many neolithic tribes.

I'm sure new species can develop on Earth, I'm just opposed to atheists about where the first animals originated.
Okay, now to get to my point : what if I told you that every single Orthodox saint of the 20th century who spoke out about the subject of evolution spoke out against it and in favor of young earth creationism instead? Would it influence your opinion in any way or would you just not care because le science?
Okay, let's consider you're right. Isn't the fact that Christianity was adopted in Europe and not adopted in Africa(Christianity started right in the middle, in fact closer to Africa) indicative of the white man being better able to grasp the concept of, understand, and align with a good God? Doesn't that imply as a whole, the white race is better?
Then let's also consider you're right and let's assume the white race is indeed superior. Saint Tikhon, in one of his sermons in a native Alaskan church, stated that true civilization consists in elevating the lower races to the level of the higher ones. Not destroy them, but offer them a hand of mercy. Because God commanded you to defend the weak and the fatherless. That is what true civilization is : you can measure the worth of any civilization by looking at how they treat their weakest members. So even if your race *is* superior, you are still commanded to take care of the lower races.
What are your answers to the 2 questions?
I don't believe in any evolution and I believe in young earth creationism. That is the proper Orthodox Christian view, held by all the saints of the church.
 
As for IQ... I genuinely just don't care, IQ is often tested with western bias, if I sent you to Ethiopia then you'd be the silly one from their perspective. Ask yourself : can you do the kinds of menial work they do every day in rural areas? Most westerners have no idea what living in such conditions is like. They may lack skills you value, but you also lack skills they value. We should all humble ourselves in my opinion.
Studied IQ in psychology because ofc it's psychometric tool first and foremost.
One index of intelligence is verbal comprehension, which is a cristallized intelligence index, and cristallized intelligence, unlike fluid intelligence, is based a lot on what you learn.

Thus, a child who reads a lot is going to have a high score at this index and a higher score on the general scale.
As of today, Kangz in BBCland have other things to worry about than to provide a tolkien roman to their children

Also, psychanalysis, aka what Freud invented, is not considered science in modern psychology.
Matter of fact where I study at they hate him and we don't even study the slightest bit of psychanalysis. So don't worry on psychology being a "jewish" invention, it's not
 
Back
Top