The Spanish Civil War, A Right-Wing-Nationalist Win, And an Communist-Antifa loss.

Anon Humor Sharty Chud88 said:
We won In the Spanish-Civil-War and (((They))) lost we defended and protected Traditional-European-Western-Monarchaic Society, Civilisation and Values.
Click to expand...
Franco was a 5'3 manlet that imported Moroccan battalions to rape Spanish women (not even racebait. Look it up they actually promised this to them). He also eternally cucked carlists and falangists until he died. He at least caused an economic miracle by privatizing industries and opening the country up to foreign investment after the failure of autarky. He gave power to a liberal and became yet another american vassal.
 
Anon Humor Sharty Chud88 said:
Wait, Franco was Jewish?!
Click to expand...
Lism said:
Franco was a moderate conservative who didn't know how to play the long con and turned a blind eye to the imprisonment of de Rivera, an actual Fascist, because he saw him as a rival. He actually went out of his way not to make a deal to get him out of prison. All of his efforts were for nothing because he chose not to do anything in WWII despite the great deal of assistance Italy and Germany provided, and ultimately when he was out of office Spain immediately folded to the European libtards. They lost the civil war but I would hesitate to say "we won".
Click to expand...
Anyways Franco wasn't actually jewish, this is GoyimTV tier retardation, it is as accurate as saying Fidel Castro was Jewish, none of them have Jewish ancestors that we can find in their family tree, its just these surnames happen to be used by some jews, same with some German surnames that normal germans have.

As for Franco not knowing how to play the long game, I honestly disagree, the Falangists, especially Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera, were retarded, for 3 main reasons

1. The falangist movement appealed too much to browns, it believed in bleaching, so as a result, it encouraged south Americans to mix to "better their blood" Ramiro Ledesma Ramos, a falangist leader, even went as far as claiming that Spaniards are Closer to their south American brothers than they are to Anglos, Italians, etc.... they did not neccessarily see them as equals like Lusotropicalism did, but they did think they could be bleached, that is why so many brown latinxes practice falangism now.

2. The falangist movement was divided into 2 main areas, Ledesma's faction(JONSISM), which prioritized industrialization, but a much more secular and less corporatist approach to the economic issues of Spain, he also did not believe in giving autonomy to the other languages.
Then there was the other faction (the one that became popular even after Antonio's death) the catholic falangist faction, this faction was far more religious, and valued the iberian languages more, but most importantly, they wanted to prioritize agrarianism over industrialization, Spain at the time was poorly industrialized, and staying agrarian would only make living standards worse and make them economy stunted, so Franco already is better in the falangists on the nationalist aspect AND industrialization aspect.

3. The falangists would have been less hesitant to follow Hitler in his war, in which, it would have destroyed the purpose of the civil war itself, because Spain during the war was extremely vulnerable, so they'd just become a 3rd pozzed republic.

Franco was a pragmatist, and that made his country better, he at first practiced some of Antonio's policies, but the Spanish population during this point was starving, urban centers dilapidated, people displaced, etc.... and it did not help that during the Civil war, Catalonian seperatists did communal farming, which completely destroyed their yields and exacerbated the mass starvation of the Spanish after the war, Franco had to take so many risks to fix the mess the seperatists did because of that. Once Franco started thinking in a more pragmatic mind, he started allying with the west, ideologically, Spain remained the same, the birth rates were some of the highest in Europe (now it is one of the lowest) and the economy was flourishing, and spain was actually making AND exporting their own products, and their industrial capabilities were very promising, there was no societal decay prior to Franco, unfortunately, his successor, Carrero Blanco, was assasinated, so he was forced to choose a libtarded king as his successor instead, which has now doomed Spain.

72342%20-%20SoyBooru.png
 
DonutHole said:
Franco was a 5'3 manlet that imported Moroccan battalions to rape Spanish women (not even racebait. Look it up they actually promised this to them). He also eternally cucked carlists and falangists until he died. He at least caused an economic miracle by privatizing industries and opening the country up to foreign investment after the failure of autarky. He gave power to a liberal and became yet another american vassal.
Click to expand...
Carlists and Falangists were and are race traitors who believe in bleaching, and they wanted agrarianism which was out of touch for the modern era
 
FerdinandDist said:
Carlists and Falangists were and are race traitors who believe in bleaching, and they wanted agrarianism which was out of touch for the modern era
Click to expand...
Spain has never been a nation to concern itself too much with racial purity though, if at all.
 
istanbul said:
Spain has never been a nation to concern itself too much with racial purity though, if at all.
Click to expand...
they had caste systems for a reason, which in and of itself made it very taboo to racemix, why do you think White Cubans like me exist(albeit after Castro the country's white population went into a demographic toilet), and no, I do not mean white as in castizo, like some other people I have met.
 
FerdinandDist said:
they had caste systems for a reason, which in and of itself made it very taboo to racemix, why do you think White Cubans like me exist(albeit after Castro the country's white population went into a demographic toilet), and no, I do not mean white as in castizo, like some other people I have met.
Click to expand...
The whole Reason latrine America is as racially mixed as it is, is mainly because of the abolishment of the caste system after several countries declared independence, sure, conquistadors did mix, I am not denying that, but the effect they had was overblown, endogamy rates (meaning rates of marriage between the same races) at their lowest were 94% during the rule of Spain.
72237%20-%20SoyBooru.png
 
FerdinandDist said:
they had caste systems for a reason, which in and of itself made it very taboo to racemix, why do you think White Cubans like me exist(albeit after Castro the country's white population went into a demographic toilet), and no, I do not mean white as in castizo, like some other people I have met.
Click to expand...
do u not think Castro was a necessary evil or something otherwise you would've turned into puerto rico 2 (shithole)
 
istanbul said:
do u not think Castro was a necessary evil or something otherwise you would've turned into puerto rico 2 (shithole)
Click to expand...
Honestly, I used to despise Castro (I still do, got into an argument a while back with my grandfather over it since he was a consul under Castro) but I do see him now as a neccessary evil, not because he would be better than the latter for Cuba specifically, but rather his actions were better for white Cubans technically, since most of them ended up leaving and avoided possibly mixing with mulattoes in the future if it stayed under US supervision, ever since we left the Spanish, Cuba was a sinking ship demographically because beforehand niggers lived terribly and produced thousands of offsprings but almost all died out so it cancelled out and whites were still pretty influential, after the US came and some presidents improved the areas in black majority areas and made them live off the government, those gorillion nigger babies would have ended up replacing the white population, plus our culture would have been negrized anyways.

basically, with Castro, its Niggers dancing to raggaeton, without Castro, it would have been whites dancing to raggaeton and eventually marrying them with no societal taboos. We should have stayed Spanish
 
FerdinandDist said:
Anyways Franco wasn't actually jewish, this is GoyimTV tier retardation, it is as accurate as saying Fidel Castro was Jewish, none of them have Jewish ancestors that we can find in their family tree, its just these surnames happen to be used by some jews, same with some German surnames that normal germans have.

As for Franco not knowing how to play the long game, I honestly disagree, the Falangists, especially Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera, were retarded, for 3 main reasons

1. The falangist movement appealed too much to browns, it believed in bleaching, so as a result, it encouraged south Americans to mix to "better their blood" Ramiro Ledesma Ramos, a falangist leader, even went as far as claiming that Spaniards are Closer to their south American brothers than they are to Anglos, Italians, etc.... they did not neccessarily see them as equals like Lusotropicalism did, but they did think they could be bleached, that is why so many brown latinxes practice falangism now.

2. The falangist movement was divided into 2 main areas, Ledesma's faction(JONSISM), which prioritized industrialization, but a much more secular and less corporatist approach to the economic issues of Spain, he also did not believe in giving autonomy to the other languages.
Then there was the other faction (the one that became popular even after Antonio's death) the catholic falangist faction, this faction was far more religious, and valued the iberian languages more, but most importantly, they wanted to prioritize agrarianism over industrialization, Spain at the time was poorly industrialized, and staying agrarian would only make living standards worse and make them economy stunted, so Franco already is better in the falangists on the nationalist aspect AND industrialization aspect.

3. The falangists would have been less hesitant to follow Hitler in his war, in which, it would have destroyed the purpose of the civil war itself, because Spain during the war was extremely vulnerable, so they'd just become a 3rd pozzed republic.

Franco was a pragmatist, and that made his country better, he at first practiced some of Antonio's policies, but the Spanish population during this point was starving, urban centers dilapidated, people displaced, etc.... and it did not help that during the Civil war, Catalonian seperatists did communal farming, which completely destroyed their yields and exacerbated the mass starvation of the Spanish after the war, Franco had to take so many risks to fix the mess the seperatists did because of that. Once Franco started thinking in a more pragmatic mind, he started allying with the west, ideologically, Spain remained the same, the birth rates were some of the highest in Europe (now it is one of the lowest) and the economy was flourishing, and spain was actually making AND exporting their own products, and their industrial capabilities were very promising, there was no societal decay prior to Franco, unfortunately, his successor, Carrero Blanco, was assasinated, so he was forced to choose a libtarded king as his successor instead, which has now doomed Spain.

72342%20-%20SoyBooru.png
Click to expand...
Hmm, some of this is good redpill material, but wasn't franco of similar attitude towards Spaniards in LatAm? I thought I heard that somewhere.

And now that I have thought about it, I agree that it was probably better that Spain didn't join the war, because then the allies probably would have just invaded vulnerable Spain and gotten an easy second front on the war before Africa was even settled. It really depends how strong Spain could have been that short after the civil war though.
 
Lism said:
Hmm, some of this is good redpill material, but wasn't franco of similar attitude towards Spaniards in LatAm? I thought I heard that somewhere.

And now that I have thought about it, I agree that it was probably better that Spain didn't join the war, because then the allies probably would have just invaded vulnerable Spain and gotten an easy second front on the war before Africa was even settled. It really depends how strong Spain could have been that short after the civil war though.
Click to expand...
Franco only did it symbolically, he didn't actually mean to intervene, the falangists in contrast, would have support internationalist escapades against the united states in latin america while their country is in shambles, his friendships with certain lat am figures was for economic purposes, not really for "hispanidad", same reason he used falangist symbolism and mourned Antonio, it was all symbolic, he didn't really believe it
 
FerdinandDist said:
Franco only did it symbolically, he didn't actually mean to intervene, the falangists in contrast, would have support internationalist escapades against the united states in latin america while their country is in shambles, his friendships with certain lat am figures was for economic purposes, not really for "hispanidad", same reason he used falangist symbolism and mourned Antonio, it was all symbolic, he didn't really believe it
Click to expand...
#BruhMoment. Thank you for this enightening redpill
 

Similar threads

SmallAnus
It's been 106 years since World War 1 ended
Replies
3
Views
77
Hagon
Hagon
Hamas_2
Thoughts on Waco and how it lead to a bombing of children caused by a gulf war vet?
Replies
16
Views
377
doedoedoedoedoedoedoedoe
doedoedoedoedoedoedoedoe
ISTANBUL
>Arrow NOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T WAGE WAR THAT'S HECKIN' ILLEGALERINO
Replies
7
Views
186
GauntletThrown
GauntletThrown
GuroGOD
Will something like virus or global war ever happen again
Replies
4
Views
129
Neutralplier
Neutralplier
I
Chud Are (((they))) cooking up a race war in America?
2 3
Replies
50
Views
710
ISTANBUL
ISTANBUL
Back
Top