Do you believe in genetics?

title


  • Total voters
    36
Do you have a snopes reviewed article to back this up?
The modern Persian name of Iran (ایران) derives from the 3rd-century Sasanian Middle Persian ērān (Pahlavi spelling: 𐭠𐭩𐭫𐭠𐭭, ʼyrʼn), where it initially meant "of the Aryans," [1] and acquired a geographical connotation in the sense of "(lands inhabited by) Aryans."[1] In both geographic and demonymic senses, ērān is distinguished from its antonymic anērān, meaning "non-Iran(ian)".[1][2]
 
Anyone who voted no needs to look in the mirror and think about why God made them brown.
When I question the leftist way of looking at muh science, people in these spaces say im le keyed. When I do the exact same thing to the right wing equivalent of it, insults like "you're brown" start flying around. That's why I have a hard time taking science itself as a whole seriously, it will never be free of ideology and subjective ways of interpreting evidence and that's fine. But this also gives me the right to reject science entirely when it contradicts with my ideas, in the same way you do it. So I don't understand why you'd be outraged.
 
The modern Persian name of Iran (ایران) derives from the 3rd-century Sasanian Middle Persian ērān (Pahlavi spelling: 𐭠𐭩𐭫𐭠𐭭, ʼyrʼn), where it initially meant "of the Aryans," [1] and acquired a geographical connotation in the sense of "(lands inhabited by) Aryans."[1] In both geographic and demonymic senses, ērān is distinguished from its antonymic anērān, meaning "non-Iran(ian)".[1][2]
Modern Turks are race mixed beyond recognition however.
When I question the leftist way of looking at muh science, people in these spaces say im le keyed. When I do the exact same thing to the right wing equivalent of it, insults like "you're brown" start flying around. That's why I have a hard time taking science itself as a whole seriously, it will never be free of ideology and subjective ways of interpreting evidence and that's fine. But this also gives me the right to reject science entirely when it contradicts with my ideas, in the same way you do it. So I don't understand why you'd be outraged.
Science is an attempt to understand the world from a non-religious perspective. Like are you going to deny parents don’t pass their genes down to their offspring?
 
Science is an attempt to understand the world from a non-religious perspective. Like are you going to deny parents don’t pass their genes down to their offspring?
Yes that's what science is... And I want my worldview to be governed entirely from the religious perspective without any compromises. I want to be the bigoted medieval fanatical zealot that modern people see as backward and le evil. Absolutely zero compromises with anything that throws a wrench in its narrative. Because in Orthodoxy it is not logic that reigns supreme over tradition, it is tradition that reigns supreme over logic. In the same manner, we never made the claim that God was logical, we made the claim that God was grace. We asserted that God is above logic, just as he is above everything He created, therefore he's not bound by the logic He gave us either. But, as I mentioned before in the thread, I don't deny genetics entirely. I'm just indifferent if it's there on its own and always operates while being bound by Orthodox morals. I only become hostile when it contradicts with the faith. So no, I don't deny that parents pass on their genes to their offspring.

I hope that makes more sense.
Modern Turks are race mixed beyond recognition however.
Correct but he's Iranian geg. Iranians aren't Turkic.
 
Yes that's what science is... And I want my worldview to be governed entirely from the religious perspective without any compromises. I want to be the bigoted medieval fanatical zealot that modern people see as backward and le evil. Absolutely zero compromises with anything that throws a wrench in its narrative. Because in Orthodoxy it is not logic that reigns supreme over tradition, it is tradition that reigns supreme over logic. In the same manner, we never made the claim that God was logical, we made the claim that God was grace. We asserted that God is above logic, just as he is above everything He created, therefore he's not bound by the logic He gave us either. But, as I mentioned before in the thread, I don't deny genetics entirely. I'm just indifferent if it's there on its own and always operates while being bound by Orthodox morals. I only become hostile when it contradicts with the faith. So no, I don't deny that parents pass on their genes to their offspring.

I hope that makes more sense.

Correct but he's Iranian geg. Iranians aren't Turkic.
Isn't he kipchak or some Iranian turkic ethnicity doe
 
I picked no but not because I don't believe in their existence, but rather due to the fact that it doesn't shape my worldview in any meaningful way. I'm indifferent to the concept.
I mean I do believe that being a woman or being a man are two different realities, I'm sure you'd agree.
Quite happy with my Y chromosome
smugjak
 
I mean I do believe that being a woman or being a man are two different realities, I'm sure you'd agree.
Quite happy with my Y chromosome
smugjak
I don't need genes to know being a man and being a woman are two different realities. The bible already tells me that right in genesis. Anyway, as I said a million times, I don't deny genetics.
Isn't he kipchak or some Iranian turkic ethnicity doe
Didn't know, sorry.
 
Modern Turks are race mixed beyond recognition however.
I am mixed but not beyond recognition. That still makes me more aryan than you.
Isn't he kipchak or some Iranian turkic ethnicity
I don't think I'm kipchak. My ethnicity isn't majority asian either. It's just that some people that live in the place where I'm from have asian looks. We don't categorize people based on skin color and looks, but based on family connections and tribes so it's hard to tell where my roots is. Also I lied in the poll I'm not completely asian, my mom is white, I should've chosen mixed but being mixed is LE BAD by chuds or something.
 
alright guys im back and i do believe in genetics because i am incapable of growing a beard and probably will go bald at 30
 
Yes that's what science is... And I want my worldview to be governed entirely from the religious perspective without any compromises. I want to be the bigoted medieval fanatical zealot that modern people see as backward and le evil. Absolutely zero compromises with anything that throws a wrench in its narrative. Because in Orthodoxy it is not logic that reigns supreme over tradition, it is tradition that reigns supreme over logic. In the same manner, we never made the claim that God was logical, we made the claim that God was grace. We asserted that God is above logic, just as he is above everything He created, therefore he's not bound by the logic He gave us either. But, as I mentioned before in the thread, I don't deny genetics entirely. I'm just indifferent if it's there on its own and always operates while being bound by Orthodox morals. I only become hostile when it contradicts with the faith. So no, I don't deny that parents pass on their genes to their offspring.

I hope that makes more sense.

Correct but he's Iranian geg. Iranians aren't Turkic.
Yeah, I think we are complete opposites in regards to our beliefs.
 
Back
Top