Do you believe in genetics?

[FrogKing]

datamining because i wanna know something

 

[FrogKing]

This is in /pol/ because its relevant to something else, okay????

 

[baqqrih]

Yeah, I think they exist.

 

[basil]

yeah!! how ELSE would the goronyosaurus cost 8,500 DNA in jurassic world: the game??

 

[Aedra]

I picked no but not because I don't believe in their existence, but rather due to the fact that it doesn't shape my worldview in any meaningful way. I'm indifferent to the concept.

 

[BLACKHAWK]

yeah!! how ELSE would the goronyosaurus cost 8,500 DNA in jurassic world: the game??

hahahaha

 

[BLACKHAWK]

I picked no but not because I don't believe in their existence, but rather due to the fact that it doesn't shape my worldview in any meaningful way. I'm indifferent to the concept.

but it does affect smell.

 

[Aedra]

but it does affect smell.

Well you certainly smell like shit from what I can speculate, so yeah maybe.

 

[(In)CelibatePsycho]

Obviously, what a stupid poll. That’s like asking “are transgenders mentally ill.” The answer is obvious so why are you even asking

 

[Aedra]

Obviously, what a stupid poll. That’s like asking “are transgenders mentally ill.” The answer is obvious so why are you even asking

All things in modern society should be questioned, even the things you take for granted, all of it.

Everything is fake, everything is gay, and you have to point it all out. That's how I approach modernity at this point. So I do see some value in the question.

 

[(In)CelibatePsycho]

All things in modern society should be questioned, even the things you take for granted, all of it.

Everything is fake, everything is gay, and you have to point it all out. That's how I approach modernity at this point. So I do see some value in the question.

Yes, it should be questioned.
“Is 2+2=4”
Hmm let me think about it. Yes. Alright I have adequately questioned this topic, and have an non-nigger tier in so I am fairly confident that I’m right and I don’t feel the need to make a post about the question on some woah jak forum

Obv the poster is just detaining for fun but it’s still a stupid question and I don’t like how people debate it so frequently and seriously when people should know the answer just from using their brains for 2 seconds, no need to do a whole ass debate with people

 

[Aedra]

Yes, it should be questioned.
“Is 2+2=4”
Hmm let me think about it. Yes. Alright I have adequately questioned this topic, and have an non-nigger tier in so I am fairly confident that I’m right and I don’t feel the need to make a post about the question on some woah jak forum

Not quite the same thing thoughbeit. Genetics are closely associated with plenty of ideologies, but 2+2 isn't. The way I play the game changes depending on that.

 

[(In)CelibatePsycho]

Not quite the same thing thoughbeit. Genetics are closely associated with plenty of ideologies, but 2+2 isn't. The way I play the game changes depending on that.

I suppose. I think we are looking at this from different perspectives. You see that since people are split ideologically about the importance of genetics, and believe that therefore we should debate the topic. I agree, but I think that ideally everyone should agree that genetics are incredibly important because that it so obviously the case, and therefore there should not need to be any debate.
I think I got a bit too upset when I posted my initial comment, since under my reasoning Sneed isn’t at fault for posting the question; rather it is the fault of retards for making this a commonly debated question in the first place,

 

[Aedra]

I agree, but I think that ideally everyone should agree that genetics are incredibly important because that it so obviously the case, and therefore there should not need to be any debate.

Who decides this though? How is it decided? Why is it so obviously the case? Not everyone cares about arguments for it that come from the principle of rationalism which puts human reason above everything, in other words, some people will not care about whatever scientific evidence does exist. That's not really retardation but rather a different way of looking at the world. If someone operates on a whole different framework compared to you, then the amount of "proof" you throw at them becomes irrelevant aswell.

 

[FrogKing]

I picked no but not because I don't believe in their existence, but rather due to the fact that it doesn't shape my worldview in any meaningful way. I'm indifferent to the concept.

then why respond to the poll obsessed shitoko pedo

 

[FrogKing]

Obviously, what a stupid poll. That’s like asking “are transgenders mentally ill.” The answer is obvious so why are you even asking

I've seen people on /pol/ corroborate that genetics isn't real and bring up lamarckism and sometimes lysenko in regards to race science

 

[FrogKing]

I picked no but not because I don't believe in their existence, but rather due to the fact that it doesn't shape my worldview in any meaningful way. I'm indifferent to the concept.

also how are you indifferent to it when it affects nearly everything about you

 

[(In)CelibatePsycho]

Who decides this though? How is it decided? Why is it so obviously the case? Not everyone cares about arguments for it that come from the principle of rationalism which puts human reason above everything, in other words, some people will not care about whatever scientific evidence does exist. That's not really retardation but rather a different way of looking at the world. If someone operates on a whole different framework compared to you, then the amount of "proof" you throw at them becomes irrelevant aswell.

If the world followed your logic nothing would ever get done because we would constantly be debating retarded shit like “are cars generally smaller than houses” and “is blue a color.” For things to be done we must acknowledge that some things are obviously most likely true and we do not need to spend excessive time debating it

 

[Aedra]

also how are you indifferent to it when it affects nearly everything about you

It affects everything around me according to you.

If the world followed your logic nothing would ever get done because we would constantly be debating retarded shit like “are cars generally smaller than houses” and “is blue a color.” For things to be done we must acknowledge that some things are obviously most likely true and we do not need to spend excessive time debating it

You are misunderstanding what I said. What I said doesn't imply human logic is entirely worthless, just that there are things that come above it. So if something that logically checks out doesn't fit into, say, the tradition of a religion then that religion would put the tradition above the logic and reject the logical conclusion. There is no contradiction in this because it makes sense within the framework they would be operating on. But this doesn't mean they'd reject logic when it doesn't have anything to do with the religion. I sort of just repeated what I said earlier about this being ideological. Cars being smaller than houses doesn't mean anything in ideological terms, but genetics does.

 

[JC Denton]

I think they do exist but they aren't as important as what some people want you to believe so I chose no.