Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
trvke until I read the name of the false prophet fruut, I will now create my own, totally new and le good (it just is, okay??? soyllah said so) sectShariajak.blog won, all non Muslims of the Schlog must be forced to pay Caliph FrQQt the Jizya tax
Circular argument we've been over how a marriage doesn't automatically involve sex immediately.9<18
He was a pedophile.View attachment 33134
Hey, how come Chudittical was permad for saying he was done posting, and then changing his mind and deciding he was gonna keep posting, but defending child marriage is a 1 day ban? hrmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....
Fem altfagged after the ban to ban evade, that's not why he was banned.Fem altfagged as well.
You're pretty bad at this.
Except the marriage was consumated 9.... she was married at 6.Circular argument we've been over how a marriage doesn't automatically involve sex immediately.
I wasn't behind the ban but since he ban evaded nothing can be done.Fem altfagged after the ban to ban evade, that's not why he was banned.
Nigger.Circular argument we've been over how a marriage doesn't automatically involve sex immediately.
Just look at what Hamas_2 said
Hamas_2's argument boils down to rejecting the hadiths. All sunni muslims accept the hadiths and sparkles is sunni so you're just grasping at straws.Probably writing me.
Just look at what Hamas_2 said
No he wasn't, he played some random furry porn game on steam that had a character that, according to soygoy, "looked petite". I dug through the chudditical thread to find out the name a minute ago, and the character literally had boobs. Still gross doe and I don't care that he was banned, but he was ultimately banned because people didn't like him because he's a weird furry gooner, not for being a pedophile. Way less than what parkles did btw.He was a pedophile.
I wasn't behind the ban.No he wasn't, he played some random furry porn game on steam that had a character that, according to soygoy, "looked petite". I dug through the chudditical thread to find out the name a minute ago, and the character literally had boobs. Still gross doe and I don't care that he was banned, but he was ultimately banned because people didn't like him because he's a weird furry gooner, not for being a pedophile. Way less than what parkles did btw.
If I had actually cared about the user and if this was brought up in the original discussion then I wouldn't have moralfagged over it.Hamas_2's argument boils down to rejecting the hadiths. All sunni muslims accept the hadiths and sparkles is sunni so you're just grasping at straws.
Yeah, and you didn't bother to reverse those bans either. Almost like the schlog has always banned bad users over far less.I wasn't behind the ban.
I didn't follow the chudlittical situation personally. In fact I think I was gone when it happened. All I heard was that he was proven to be a pedophile so I didn't bother looking any further.Yeah, and you didn't bother to reverse those bans either. Almost like the schlog has always banned bad users over far less.