X migrant ack xer account

Status
Not open for further replies.
1724682066843.png

Hey, how come Chudittical was permad for saying he was done posting, and then changing his mind and deciding he was gonna keep posting, but defending child marriage is a 1 day ban? hrmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....
 
Shariajak.blog won, all non Muslims of the Schlog must be forced to pay Caliph FrQQt the Jizya tax
trvke until I read the name of the false prophet fruut, I will now create my own, totally new and le good (it just is, okay??? soyllah said so) sect
 
@Broot can you finally login and actually do something about this drama or something
 
Why do I feel like I'm waiting for the principal of a school to call me in after getting referred to the office.
 
Probably writing me.

Just look at what Hamas_2 said
Hamas_2's argument boils down to rejecting the hadiths. All sunni muslims accept the hadiths and sparkles is sunni so you're just grasping at straws.
 
He was a pedophile.
No he wasn't, he played some random furry porn game on steam that had a character that, according to soygoy, "looked petite". I dug through the chudditical thread to find out the name a minute ago, and the character literally had boobs. Still gross doe and I don't care that he was banned, but he was ultimately banned because people didn't like him because he's a weird furry gooner, not for being a pedophile. Way less than what parkles did btw.
 
hahaahah I like how broot is like the ultimate judge and we’re all fighting to be the penultimate executor
 
No he wasn't, he played some random furry porn game on steam that had a character that, according to soygoy, "looked petite". I dug through the chudditical thread to find out the name a minute ago, and the character literally had boobs. Still gross doe and I don't care that he was banned, but he was ultimately banned because people didn't like him because he's a weird furry gooner, not for being a pedophile. Way less than what parkles did btw.
I wasn't behind the ban.
 
Hamas_2's argument boils down to rejecting the hadiths. All sunni muslims accept the hadiths and sparkles is sunni so you're just grasping at straws.
If I had actually cared about the user and if this was brought up in the original discussion then I wouldn't have moralfagged over it.

This is the type of discussion we need before we ban a user on such subjective grounds like these.
 
Yeah, and you didn't bother to reverse those bans either. Almost like the schlog has always banned bad users over far less.
I didn't follow the chudlittical situation personally. In fact I think I was gone when it happened. All I heard was that he was proven to be a pedophile so I didn't bother looking any further.
 
But...just to finalize everything, does anyone have the rule-breaking post and her appeal?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top