VOTE! Who is your favorite German leader?

Title:

  • Angela Merkel

    Votes: 2 6.7%
  • Kaiser Wilhelm

    Votes: 7 23.3%
  • Erich Honecker

    Votes: 1 3.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 8 26.7%
  • Adolf Hitler

    Votes: 12 40.0%

  • Total voters
    30
Yeah, I'm not some malicious subverter who only moralfags about le nazis and no one else. I just have a particularly intense dislike of people simping for Nazis because it's usually not on the basis of anything rational but rather it happens simply because Hitler lost. Terminally online young men are naturally drawn to this type of thing since they probably feel like the losing aspect resonates with them. For that I have some sympathy. Doesn't mean this is logical in any sense of the word. I knew a guy who was a nazi sympathizer simply because everyone hated Hitler and I guess that caused him to take Hitler as a role model because this guy was severely disabled and was an outcast for all his life, so everyone hated him too. What these young men don't understand is that Hitler would not like their kind, if anything Hitler would see exactly these types of men as subhuman. It's borderline schizophrenic to fall in love with your executioner. I guess hearing this pisses off weebhunter a lot but honestly I have to say it.

>inb4 he tranny reacts this post
It's kind of ironic, how Hitler gets propped up by all the kinds of people he would hate to be associated with: terminally online, incels, outcasts, autists, people he would consider untermensch like slavs, mexicans and muttistan halfbreeds, while he gets staunchly denounced by his own folk. It really is pleasantly ironic
 
It's kind of ironic, how Hitler gets propped up by all the kinds of people he would hate to be associated with: terminally online, incels, outcasts, autists, people he would consider untermensch like slavs, mexicans and muttistan halfbreeds, while he gets staunchly denounced by his own folk. It really is pleasantly ironic
Because we’re not brainwashed by propaganda like wypipo are.
 
>One is worse than the other therefore one has to be good and the other has to be bad
Why not dislike both of them doughie ?
I look like that and I say that btw.
If the Germans won Europeans wouldn’t be getting slaughtered today. I feel that would’ve been a good thing.
 
It's kind of ironic, how Hitler gets propped up by all the kinds of people he would hate to be associated with: terminally online, incels, outcasts, autists, people he would consider untermensch like slavs, mexicans and muttistan halfbreeds, while he gets staunchly denounced by his own folk. It really is pleasantly ironic
ev&oe Mexicans have native blood which Hitler and the Nazis praised. They were only against Mexico because Mexico declared war on Germany after the Germans sunk a Mexican oil tanker.
 
If the Germans won Europeans wouldn’t be getting slaughtered today. I feel that would’ve been a good thing.
Idk about that, who can tell what would've happened if X event in the past didn't happen.
Hitler, in contrast to popular belief, held some heavy left leaning beliefs, being hiself a vegetarian for example, and apart from his hatred of jews and his nationalistic view, his social views on men and women were also pretty modern. At heart, he still was a socialist.
Also, if the modern trend of nordic and germanic countries is a consequence of the language and the culture of these countries, then it may have happened anyways, because it seems that these countries are way more progressive than the rest of the world.

Saying "If X thing happened/didn't happen, the world would be better" is the world's oldest fallacy I think.
 
ev&oe Mexicans have native blood which Hitler and the Nazis praised. They were only against Mexico because Mexico declared war on Germany after the Germans sunk a Mexican oil tanker.
>gringooo we are aryan, ese, one tortila one burito one border, a cartel to last a thousand years, hombre
mehiko.png
 
Idk about that, who can tell what would've happened if X event in the past didn't happen.
Hitler, in contrast to popular belief, held some heavy left leaning beliefs, being hiself a vegetarian for example, and apart from his hatred of jews and his nationalistic view, his social views on men and women were also pretty modern. At heart, he still was a socialist.
Also, if the modern trend of nordic and germanic countries is a consequence of the language and the culture of these countries, then it may have happened anyways, because it seems that these countries are way more progressive than the rest of the world.

Saying "If X thing happened/didn't happen, the world would be better" is the world's oldest fallacy I think.
Alright but what’s wrong with some aspects of leftism? Animal welfare for example is a good thing and that can be considered a leftist stance.
 
Alright but what’s wrong with some aspects of leftism? Animal welfare for example is a good thing and that can be considered a leftist stance.
I don't get this overfocus on animals. We live in an age where humans suffer the most and as such I will naturally direct my energy towards making things better for humans and not animals. If things were fine for humans then I'd indeed turn my attention towards animals, but right now there are far more important matters. The street dogs in Turkey have killed many children and attacked even more. Animal welfare is also rather hypocritical for someone who supports eugenics since you're applying your ideas of getting rid of "muh unfit" to humans but for some reason refuse to apply them to animals, saying we should give them their basic needs no matter what but we shouldn't do that for humans because? Mercy suddenly enters your mind when you're looking at something that's not your fellow human?
 
I don't get this overfocus on animals. We live in an age where humans suffer the most and as such I will naturally direct my energy towards making things better for humans and not animals. If things were fine for humans then I'd indeed turn my attention towards animals, but right now there are far more important matters. The street dogs in Turkey have killed many children and attacked even more. Animal welfare is also rather hypocritical for someone who supports eugenics since you're applying your ideas of getting rid of "muh unfit" to humans but for some reason refuse to apply them to animals, saying we should give them their basic needs no matter what but we shouldn't do that for humans because? Mercy suddenly enters your mind when you're looking at something that's not your fellow human?
That’s different. I think caging animals to extract every last resource from them is immoral from all perspectives, including Christian. I doubt Jesus would approve of injecting chemicals into cows and shredding baby animals in the grinder.

Euthanizing animals that pose a threat to human life is moral. Basically humans>animals but that doesn’t mean we should abuse and destroy needlessly.
 
Alright but what’s wrong with some aspects of leftism? Animal welfare for example is a good thing and that can be considered a leftist stance.
Just saying the "Hitler would've saved Europe" is a fallacy because "saving europe" depends a lot on what kind of problem you're facing.
And since the problem of modern europe is degeneracy which leads into the rest of the problems, I'm not sure Hitler would've been of any help, since this degeneracy finds its roots in marxism, and as said Hitler was a marxist.
 
It's called Jews. Quit calling it other fancy names. You're sounding like one of those amerimutt neocon boomers.
The only jew who runs for candidacy in my country is the most far right candidate we have, Eric Zemmour, a man I respect.
And the richest people in my country are mostly native french people, like Bernard Arnault.
Were I a mutt maybe I'd care, I don't.
For some reason, despite having the third largest population of jews in the world, we don't see them anywhere in the public space.
 
Were I a mutt maybe I'd care, I don't.
It doesn't matter what muh current situation in france is, you intentionally ignore what the church fathers say about the accursed kikes. I bet you don't even know how one of the greatest french saints treated the jews.
 
It doesn't matter what muh current situation in france is, you intentionally ignore what the church fathers say about the accursed kikes. I bet you don't even know how one of the greatest french saints treated the jews.
Doesn't have anything to do with the subject at hand.
I believe the talmud and the jewish traidition to be evil.
Doesn't mean that every man born of jewish descent is evil, nor that the problem of modern Europe is judaism. That was the subject of our discussion.
 
I don't. Could you tell me?
King Louis of France during the middle ages led the disputation of Paris where the Talmud was burned and the Kingdom of France cracked down on the kike community at the time. Louis is often seen as the ideal Christian monarch among Catholics. I am no Catholic but I do respect medieval Catholics, not so much modern catholics who seem to have become the slaves of the jews though.
Doesn't mean that every man born of jewish descent is evil, nor that the problem of modern Europe is judaism. That was the subject of our discussion.
The problem of the entire world is Judaism. Judaism should be destroyed and the religion should be forgotten forever. It's demonic.
 
Back
Top