basil
spent 440 quid on JW the game aquatic packs award
who r any of those peopleHarry S Truman, Winston Churchill, Charles de Gaulle, and Joseph Stalin
who r any of those peopleHarry S Truman, Winston Churchill, Charles de Gaulle, and Joseph Stalin
Naww if you dont know basic 'story you have GYATT to be a girl there is no way you could EVER be a dude frwho r any of those people
they’re all from irrelevant nations aren’t theyNaww if you dont know basic 'story you have GYATT to be a girl there is no way you could EVER be a dude fr
You will NEVER be a man
He's the father of the French and German people in my eyes. Shared heritage.Can we classify him as German? He's Germanic by being Frankish, sure, but I just don't think he encompassed the "German" cultural identity that came about some hundred years later after his death as much as he did the identity of his own Frankish people.
Literal translation of his name from German.Who tf is this karl "the great" that I have never heard of?
“The allegation of a Nazi desire to exterminate the inhabitants of the European part of the Soviet Union appeared during the Nuremberg Tribunal.”Generalplan Ost. Quit ignoring reality nigga.
Doesn't matter. Hitler mentions his desire to get rid of the slavs a lot during his table talks.“The allegation of a Nazi desire to exterminate the inhabitants of the European part of the Soviet Union appeared during the Nuremberg Tribunal.”
“The original document has not been found.”
Sounds legitimate.
He didn’t outright say to genocide them. It was more likely he wanted to subjugate them. And use them for slave labor and such.Doesn't matter. Hitler mentions his desire to get rid of the slavs a lot during his table talks.
And you approve of that I assume? You know, if you truly cared about race as much as you claim to, then you'd pick a slavic role model for yourself instead of some foreign leader who objectively hated your people. I don't think I have more to add.He didn’t outright say to genocide them. It was more likely he wanted to subjugate them. And use them for slave labor and such.
Yeah, I also don't know about this particular document proving any malicious intent of mass murder. I'm sure there's other stuff out there that could prove such a thing (I still need to do plenty of my own research to come to a proper conclusion), but I read an archive of an old Center for Open Debate on the Holocaust page on this subject a while back and I think it speaks for itself when it comes to the validity of Generalplan Ost or the plans to starve a whole bunch of Slavic victims. I still don't like much of what Hitler and the National Socialists did, but I also don't like when things I'm told about them have very futile and meager evidence to be supported with.“The allegation of a Nazi desire to exterminate the inhabitants of the European part of the Soviet Union appeared during the Nuremberg Tribunal.”
“The original document has not been found.”
Sounds legitimate.
No but I don’t like ally claims being taken as fact without further question.And you approve of that I assume? You know, if you truly cared about race as much as you claim to, then you'd pick a slavic role model for yourself instead of some foreign leader who objectively hated your people. I don't think I have more to add.
Your thoughts on this excerpt from Hitler's Table Talk, then?Yeah, I also don't know about this particular document proving any malicious intent of mass murder. I'm sure there's other stuff out there that could prove such a thing (I still need to do plenty of my own research to come to a proper conclusion), but I read an archive of an old Center for Open Debate on the Holocaust page on this subject a while back and I think it speaks for itself when it comes to the validity of Generalplan Ost or the plans to starve a whole bunch of Slavic victims.
Yeah don't take me hating Nazism as me being on the side of the allies. There were no good guys in WW2 if you ask me. I guess if I had to say which country's policies I liked the most at that time I'd say I liked Turkey's policies. Ours was officially called a "stalling policy". Turkey acted friendly towards both sides and gave the impression that it would join the war on either side soon. In reality the country was being armed, ready for a potential defensive war. Turkey only joined the allies when it became apparent that they were gonna win. As a result we got out of this world war with no losses except for some economic hardship.No but I don’t like ally claims being taken as fact without further question.
“We will isolate the rest of them.” How does that mean extermination?Your thoughts on this excerpt from Hitler's Table Talk, then?
View attachment 13590
Idk why there's such a debate over this kek. The Nazi intent was obvious. Forcefully assimilate a tiny minority of slavs judged to be worthy and get rid of the rest. How many would be "worthy" usually depended on the country as far as I understand. The Russians would be seen as the worst ones whereas the Croats got slightly better treatment for example.
Fine. Let's assume it means slavery instead. Not sure how that makes it any better.“We will isolate the rest of them.” How does that mean extermination?
Well, I think that's the greatest thought we can make of all of this. That both highlights the actual atrocities that were conducted by parts of the National Socialist regime while eliminating the lies of mass genocide that surround them, thus revealing the ultimate truth. It's the proper observation.Fine. Let's assume it means slavery instead. Not sure how that makes it any better.
Yeah, I'm not some malicious subverter who only moralfags about le nazis and no one else. I just have a particularly intense dislike of people simping for Nazis because it's usually not on the basis of anything rational but rather it happens simply because Hitler lost. Terminally online young men are naturally drawn to this type of thing since they probably feel like the losing aspect resonates with them. For that I have some sympathy. Doesn't mean this is logical in any sense of the word. I knew a guy who was a nazi sympathizer simply because everyone hated Hitler and I guess that caused him to take Hitler as a role model because this guy was severely disabled and was an outcast for all his life, so everyone hated him too. What these young men don't understand is that Hitler would not like their kind, if anything Hitler would see exactly these types of men as subhuman. It's borderline schizophrenic to fall in love with your executioner. I guess hearing this pisses off weebhunter a lot but honestly I have to say it.Well, I think that's the greatest thought we can make of all of this. That both highlights the actual atrocities that were conducted by parts of the National Socialist regime while eliminating the lies of mass genocide that surround them, thus exposing the ultimate truth. It's the proper observation.
Even doe I’d be an honorary Aryan.Yeah, I'm not some malicious subverter who only moralfags about le nazis and no one else. I just have a particularly intense dislike of people simping for Nazis because it's usually not on the basis of anything rational but rather it happens simply because Hitler lost. Terminally online young men are naturally drawn to this type of thing since they probably feel like the losing aspect resonates with them. For that I have some sympathy. Doesn't mean this is logical in any sense of the word. I knew a guy who was a nazi sympathizer simply because everyone hated Hitler and I guess that caused him to take Hitler as a role model because this guy was severely disabled and was an outcast for all his life, so everyone hated him too. What these young men don't understand is that Hitler would not like their kind, if anything Hitler would see exactly these types of men as subhuman. It's borderline schizophrenic to fall in love with your executioner. I guess hearing this pisses off weebhunter a lot but honestly I have to say it.
>inb4 he tranny reacts this post