Fortuna
❤️🤍❤️🤍❤️🤍❤️🤍❤️🤍❤️🤍❤️🤍
Sorry.Yeah nah, my dad isn't in my life anymore. Went to go fuck prostitutes.
Believing in god might aswell be the same thing as having a tulpa, which is some gay shit im ngl.
Sorry.Yeah nah, my dad isn't in my life anymore. Went to go fuck prostitutes.
Believing in god might aswell be the same thing as having a tulpa, which is some gay shit im ngl.
You're really good at apologizing.Sorry.
I think you can, and that there is evidence for it (the many witnesses of Jesus' resurrection, for one example), but, yes, you'd need faith for that evidence to actually comply with one's own mind.I mean you can't really think your way into Christianity. There's no evidence for it. You need faith.
Sorry to hear that. It explains a good bit.Yeah nah, my dad isn't in my life anymore.
It's not really evidence. It's just words in a book.the many witnesses of Jesus' resurrection, for one example
I don't know if you're insulting me or not.You're really good at apologizing.
Yeah, I guess it wouldn't fit the technical bill for "evidence", as in, something someone just sees as a fact like the green of the grass and the blue of the sky and believes, but that's where faith comes in, then; it's evidence powered by someone's faith.It's not really evidence. It's just words in a book.
Witness testimonies aren't really that great of evidence either to be honest, like with Santa Claus, people lie. All the time.Yeah, I guess it wouldn't fit the technical bill for "evidence", as in, something someone just sees as a fact like the green of the grass and the blue of the sky and believes, but that's where faith comes in, then; it's evidence powered by someone's faith.
Yeah, fulfilled prophecies are probably better pieces of evidence.Witness testimonies aren't really that great of evidence either to be honest, like with Santa Claus, people lie. All the time.
I would never tell a lie.Witness testimonies aren't really that great of evidence either to be honest, like with Santa Claus, people lie. All the time.
Even if a prophecy can be created after it has already been fulfilled? Seems like a nothingburger to me.Yeah, fulfilled prophecies are probably better pieces of evidence.
Which prophecy are you referring to that was created after being fulfilled?Even if a prophecy can be created after it has already been fulfilled? Seems like a nothingburger to me.
Why not all of them?Which prophecy are you referring to that was created after being fulfilled?
Huh? I mean, you need to be more specific than that. It's ridiculous if you're saying that they re-wrote the entire Old Testament after the prophecies were fulfilled by Christ.Why not all of them?
No, I'm saying that those books are nothing but malarkey fictional stories that everyone pretends to be real, because they're forced to believe it is so. If they heed, they'll be good little peasants and get food and it creates a lovely sense of community. If a prophecy is foretold and something mildly similar to it happens, then it's not confirmation bias, it's the prophecy! It's been fulfilled! And similarly, writing is never to be trusted on anything. Don't you know? Screenshots... can be faked. DMs... not real...Huh? I mean, you need to be more specific than that. It's ridiculous if you're saying that they re-wrote the entire Old Testament after the prophecies were fulfilled by Christ.
I think you would be a better person if you were a Christian, for what it's worth.No, I'm saying that those books are nothing but malarkey fictional stories that everyone pretends to be real, because they're forced to believe it is so. If they heed, they'll be good little peasants and get food and it creates a lovely sense of community. If a prophecy is foretold and something mildly similar to it happens, then it's not confirmation bias, it's the prophecy! It's been fulfilled! And similarly, writing is never to be trusted on anything. Don't you know? Screenshots... can be faked. DMs... not real...
Last joking part aside, I don't care if they didn't have any better way of keeping track of actual history, even if it was real, it doesn't affect us today, it's so old that it really doesn't matter anymore, and if anything, trusting an extremely old piece of evidence which is based off of uncredible witness testimonies from a bunch of literal whos, is quite literally outdated and unreliable. You can't use god or jesus as evidence in court, for example.
The way our world works has changed, faith isn't enough. And I'm glad we have the technology we have today to actually prove things without a shred of a doubt. Plus what's in the bible that's so important anyways, that god exists? Okay, and? I don't care. Good for you though.
Fair enough, then. You aren't going to believe anything that I'm telling you, anyway, so I shouldn't waste my words any further.No, I'm saying that those books are nothing but malarkey fictional stories that everyone pretends to be real, because they're forced to believe it is so. If they heed, they'll be good little peasants and get food and it creates a lovely sense of community. If a prophecy is foretold and something mildly similar to it happens, then it's not confirmation bias, it's the prophecy! It's been fulfilled! And similarly, writing is never to be trusted on anything. Don't you know? Screenshots... can be faked. DMs... not real...
Last joking part aside, I don't care if they didn't have any better way of keeping track of actual history, even if it was real, it doesn't affect us today, it's so old that it really doesn't matter anymore, and if anything, trusting an extremely old piece of evidence which is based off of uncredible witness testimonies from a bunch of literal whos, is quite literally outdated and unreliable. You can't use god or jesus as evidence in court, for example.
The way our world works has changed, faith isn't enough. And I'm glad we have the technology we have today to actually prove things without a shred of a doubt. Plus what's in the bible that's so important anyways, that god exists? Okay, and? I don't care. Good for you though.
Pretty much, why should I take your word for it? I should take God's word for it instead.Fair enough, then. You aren't going to believe anything that I'm telling you, anyway, so I shouldn't waste my words any further.
I don't think I'd want to talk to someone who doesn't believe I exist either.Pretty much, why should I take your word for it? I should take God's word for it instead.
And he has yet to return my calls or DMS.
You exist though. Even if I didn't believe you existed, you physically do exist, and you can talk to me regardless, so that doesn't really prove anything, it just proves that people who have faith in God are prone to religious delusions. I'd like to believe the British TV License doesn't exist, and yet it does.I don't think I'd want to talk to someone who doesn't believe I exist either.
You can't prove I exist.You exist though. Even if I didn't believe you existed, you physically do exist, and you can talk to me regardless, so that doesn't really prove anything, it just proves that people who have faith in God are prone to religious delusions. I'd like to believe the British TV License doesn't exist, and yet it does.
Well I'm talking to somebody, aren't I? Even if you don't exist, I still don't care. I don't get why God existing is such a big deal anyways, he either does or doesn't, so who cares?You can't prove I exist.