Was tarrant based?

[Hamas_2]

View attachment 36151
They indeed were not white.

there's a blond muslim women in the left doe

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

there's a blond muslim women in the left doe

where

 

[Hamas_2]

where

I mean right, the fat one

 

[SmallAnus]

Why do you have a loli as your pfp?

>xhe ignored this question

 

[Hamas_2]

>xhe ignored this question

>Because we unbotherd lolicon GODS are unbotherd aryan white 1488 ss waffen kike slaying mudslime slaying gigachads ARYANS lol..or something
>*BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!*

 

[baqqrih]

color me surprised

If you say so, man

 

[lifesucksthenyoudie]

His shooting of civilians has lead to nothing but his cause looking like fools and his country losing their guns, so I'd have to say no.

 

[SmallAnus]

His shooting of civilians has lead to nothing but his cause looking like fools and his country losing their guns, so I'd have to say no.

>giving the state more excuses to take your firearms by force
tarrant(taking bbc in prison right about now)sisses... do you really?

 

[baqqrih]

I explained that in the beginning of the post. Here's my logic:
>1: Self defence is justified. (Bible)
>2: Besides commiting more crimes than Whites, Invaders are intentionally immigrating to White countries and reproducing faster than White people. (https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...ive-births-to-non-uk-born-and-uk-born-mothers)
>3: Becoming a minority group is a bad thing, and is harmful, and is worse than staying a majority. (Common sense, if you ask me.)
>D: B, therefore Invaders will outnumber Whites in the future.
>E: D, therefore Whites will be a minority.
>F: E, therefore Whites will be subject to a bad thing carried out by Invaders.
>G: F, therefore Whites are being harmed by Invaders.
>H: A & F, therefore Whites can righteously defend against Invaders.
>I: H, therefore Whites can get rid of the invaders.

I am sorry that I didn't respond to this on the day that you posted it. I did not see it. To respond to your logic, I must first consider the first point you've listed that forms the cornerstone to this argument of yours; on the justification of self-defense in the Bible. Killing children, even for whatever sake or effort you may believe it is justified for, is not at all justified through scripture. God showed his clear wrath and objection against the deaths of children (in dedication and sacrifice to idols, specifically) throughout the stories we hear of Ancient Israel in the Old Testament. Is this effort you speak of, then, not in of itself an idol (in the form of ideology), if people like this Tarrant who you praise are the sort to fruitlessly pursue it at the cost of gunning down little babies in violation to God's will? You can't place actions like this above the will of God.

 

[yazidi_pal_friend_bro]

The church allegedly has some recurring ISIS recruitment going on, but idk if tarrant knew about that or took anything like that into account.

 

[Chairman]

I am sorry that I didn't respond to this on the day that you posted it. I did not see it. To respond to your logic, I must first consider the first point you've listed that forms the cornerstone to this argument of yours; on the justification of self-defense in the Bible. Killing children, even for whatever sake or effort you may believe it is justified for, is not at all justified through scripture. God showed his clear wrath and objection against the deaths of children (in dedication and sacrifice to idols, specifically) throughout the stories we hear of Ancient Israel in the Old Testament. Is this effort you speak of, then, not in of itself an idol (in the form of ideology), if people like this Tarrant who you praise are the sort to fruitlessly pursue it at the cost of gunning down little babies in violation to God's will? You can't place actions like this above the will of God.

I still hold that killing children in this case is justified. But for the sake of argument, let's consider killing children to not be justified. In that case, what do you have to say about the grown adults he killed? He only killed one child, aged 3. The three next youngest were 14, 16, and 17 (all old enough to be valid targets). The rest were all undisputable adults; legal majors[1]. Even if killing children was unacceptable, what about the vast majority who were adults?
1; https://edramatica.com/Brenton_Tarrant#List_of_Kebabs☪_Removed

 

[Satoko_Fans_Arent_White]

I still hold that killing children in this case is justified. But for the sake of argument, let's consider killing children to not be justified. In that case, what do you have to say about the grown adults he killed? He only killed one child, aged 3. The three next youngest were 14, 16, and 17 (all old enough to be valid targets). The rest were all undisputable adults; legal majors[1]. Even if killing children was unacceptable, what about the vast majority who were adults?
1; https://edramatica.com/Brenton_Tarrant#List_of_Kebabs☪_Removed

killing people bad doe

 

[EVROPA]

>Race over religion
Friend, do you not realize what you're saying here? Race is of the world, and the spiritual realm of The Lord presides over it. We're in God's universe, rather than our own, so it's our duty to follow the Ever-Wise Creator's will over all others, because He is the most wise and most knowledgeable, so He knows the ultimate morality far greater than you or I could without Him.

Thats a load of jargon. The white race is a people who identifies closely with myself and I would rather align with their interests. There are black and brown christians who should never come near a white person unless at the end of a gun in war. How do you reconcile non-white christians?

 

[Chairman]

killing people bad doe

I'm arguing that what Tarrant did was self-defence, which is het good.

 

[baqqrih]

I still hold that killing children in this case is justified. But for the sake of argument, let's consider killing children to not be justified. In that case, what do you have to say about the grown adults he killed? He only killed one child, aged 3. The three next youngest were 14, 16, and 17 (all old enough to be valid targets). The rest were all undisputable adults; legal majors[1]. Even if killing children was unacceptable, what about the vast majority who were adults?
1; https://edramatica.com/Brenton_Tarrant#List_of_Kebabs☪_Removed

Of the grown adults, I still hold firm my own position on defining self-defense, as I've yet to hear scripture from you that clarifies that mass murdering a group of people in a building who aren't actively, literally killing others (we can use hyperbole about their presence in the country all day, but these people weren't literally coming at him with knives when he shot all of them) is justifiable in the Christian perspective. When I first asked, you quoted Tarrant's manifesto. The only times we're allowed to kill people as Christians is in times of a just war (a rarity of today), in capital punishment, or in full, outright self-defense of your own person or those around you as it is necessary ("those around you" used in a literal context of people around you who are within your general vicinity of where you are i.e I stand next to a guy and see him get stabbed, I attack the attacker. This is to be contrasted with an entire people who you live in the same, wide land as and who you believe are being genocided through their ethnic replacement, for there is no just war being waged to justify, therefore, any mass slaying of combatants, let alone, in our instance, non-combatants, who we can not find any scriptural justification to murder).

 

[baqqrih]

Thats a load of jargon. The white race is a people who identifies closely with myself and I would rather align with their interests. There are black and brown christians who should never come near a white person unless at the end of a gun in war. How do you reconcile non-white christians?

What, you'd rather align with the interests of a group of humans than the thing that created them? Do you think you know things better than God? As for non-White Christians, if you're asking how I feel of living near them, I'd much rather they have their own states where their own families can prosper separate from my people, but one has to eventually accept that that is simply impossible in today's world, for such a thing to happen, as much as we'd prefer it to.

 

[Goldy]

ITT: Glowies

 

[Imperator]

Stop it sneedson.

 

[Brainstorm]

 

[EVROPA]

What, you'd rather align with the interests of a group of humans than the thing that created them? Do you think you know things better than God? As for non-White Christians, if you're asking how I feel of living near them, I'd much rather they have their own states where their own families can prosper separate from my people, but one has to eventually accept that that is simply impossible in today's world, for such a thing to happen, as much as we'd prefer it to.

I dont believe in God, and most christians are shitskins so I don't think you got anything to brag about. I say theres about a 50/50 chance that there is or isnt a god, and i'm not going to force other people to believe in those odds either.