thread_prefix.23 Total Muslim Death

[Warrior-Z]

Supreme falsehood that you can't articulate because they did literally nothing but btfo muzzies (based)

marge

Why yes I do this

I don't have a filed named that
Why are you trying to datamine me you obsessed clittycel, stop leaking

KEEEEEEEEEEK HE AVOIDED MY REFUTATION

 

[terrycrews]

@jimbo Tell them about my huge penis

 

[Alextremo2TheMax]

Intentional tampering? History isn’t black-and-white, dumbass, there's going to be conflicting sources and interpretations. You cling to two accounts like they’re the holy grail, but guess what? That’s not how historical analysis works. Ibn Jareer al-Tabari is a historical source that is respected in Islamic historiography, not "a goggle doc concocted in a basement of mine." Crack a book instead of cracking stupid jokes. You dismiss actual sources because they don’t fit your narrative. That’s called intellectual laziness, bitch. You can’t be shouting “best source!” while you’re ignoring anything that might contradict it. And this "Bible math" nonsense? Retard, the chronology is reasoned and supported by accurate historical data, such as Abd al-Rahman’s age. This must be math in the real sense since it will really knock the wings off you, you would rather work with generalized theories rather than stick to facts.
Come back when you learn what debating even is.

You literally called hadiths lies and faleshoods, and you directly claimed they were intentionally fabricated, and now you're crying that you've been asked to prove it?
>You dismiss actual sources because they don’t fit your narrative.
I dismiss google docs by schizos
Cite an actual source

 

[Alextremo2TheMax]

KEEEEEEEEEEK HE AVOIDED MY REFUTATION

You're so profoundly obsessed with me just because I'm not a pedophile like you

 

[obsessed venusian]

You're so profoundly obsessed with me just because I'm not a pedophile like you

Ad hominem

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

Supreme falsehood that you can't articulate because they did literally nothing but btfo muzzies (based)

marge

Why yes I do this

I don't have a filed named that
Why are you trying to datamine me you obsessed clittycel, stop leaking

>Clittycel
>Stop leaking
>Why yes I post pro-Israel content on /pol/
The Spaniards and Portuguese after kicking the muzzies out also kicked out all of the Jews in iberia aswell due to the Jews in Al-Andulus actually opening the gates of Toledo to Muslim invaders and serving in positions of power in Al-Andulus the Spanish were known in the inquisition to literally torture and murder Jews in questioning for their loyalties also stop denying the fact Spain and Portugal literally were the first countries that built modern western civilization today without them we would not have found the new world and made the big first empires of Europe if they had not took that leap and first actions

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

Supreme falsehood that you can't articulate because they did literally nothing but btfo muzzies (based)

marge

Why yes I do this

I don't have a filed named that
Why are you trying to datamine me you obsessed clittycel, stop leaking

I’m talking about a file I didn’t want to say the rest of due to its perversity and nsfw content

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

Supreme falsehood that you can't articulate because they did literally nothing but btfo muzzies (based)

marge

Why yes I do this

I don't have a filed named that
Why are you trying to datamine me you obsessed clittycel, stop leaking

So much copium and rejection of basic facts and retardation to world history

 

[Alextremo2TheMax]

View attachment 107521
>Clittycel
>Stop leaking
>Why yes I post pro-Israel content on /pol/
The Spaniards and Portuguese after kicking the muzzies out also kicked out all of the Jews in iberia aswell due to the Jews in Al-Andulus actually opening the gates of Toledo to Muslim invaders and serving in positions of power in Al-Andulus the Spanish were known in the inquisition to literally torture and murder Jews in questioning for their loyalties also stop denying the fact Spain and Portugal literally were the first countries that built modern western civilization today without them we would not have found the new world and made the big first empires of Europe if they had not took that leap and first actions

>that built modern western civilization today
what, spain? brazil? mexico? blud....

 

[Warrior-Z]

You literally called hadiths lies and faleshoods, and you directly claimed they were intentionally fabricated, and now you're crying that you've been asked to prove it?
>You dismiss actual sources because they don’t fit your narrative.
I dismiss google docs by schizos
Cite an actual source

Have never referred to hadiths as "lies." What I did was to raise doubts regarding the interpretations offered for their contents, which stands true historically. You do not need to prove the intentional fabrication of a source in order to criticize it, that's merely you trying weakly to dodge the real argument. Saying it's schizo is but a weak and pathetic attempt to escape some solid evidence. If you're confident, address the timeline then, no balls.

 

[Alextremo2TheMax]

Have never referred to hadiths as "lies." What I did was to raise doubts regarding the interpretations offered for their contents, which stands true historically. You do not need to prove the intentional fabrication of a source in order to criticize it, that's merely you trying weakly to dodge the real argument. Saying it's schizo is but a weak and pathetic attempt to escape some solid evidence. If you're confident, address the timeline then, no balls.

Have never referred to hadiths as "lies."

Why lie? we can see your post history, plus the schizodoc you're posting literally says the same thing. Two seperate references to the same phenomenon in history does require STRONG evidence to disprove and it would also logically imply an intentional FABRICATION, that's your claim, own it

Saying it's schizo is but a weak and pathetic attempt to escape some solid evidence.

>posting a google doc is solid evidence
If you had solid evidence you would be posting it, you would be citing prominent unbiased historians from historical journals, not schizodocs

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

>that built modern western civilization today
what, spain? brazil? mexico? blud....

They literally made England and France with their discoveries come to the new world and make empires based off Spain’s model which we lead to and make way for Modern Western European civilization as we see it today retard

 

[Warrior-Z]

Why lie? we can see your post history, plus the schizodoc you're posting literally says the same thing. Two seperate references to the same phenomenon in history does require STRONG evidence to disprove and it would also logically imply an intentional FABRICATION, that's your claim, own it

Critiquing the sources does not mean calling them "intentional fabrications." Alternative evidence raises challenges pertaining to interpretation, not authenticity. Two similar accounts do not make them unapproachable, dumbass. History is not a court of law where the standard of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt."
If you want a debate, stop sidestepping and look straight at the contradictions

If you had solid evidence you would be posting it, you would be citing prominent unbiased historians from historical journals, not schizodocs

Wanna know the funniest part? IS THAT I LITERALLY DID THAT MULTIPLE TIMES LMAO BUT YOU DIDNT READ IT BECAUSE YOU'RE A SCARED LITTLE CUCK, I CITED TABARI'S BOOK WHICH IS KNOWN KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK

 

[Alextremo2TheMax]

Critiquing the sources does not mean calling them "intentional fabrications." Alternative evidence raises challenges pertaining to interpretation, not authenticity. Two similar accounts do not make them unapproachable, dumbass. History is not a court of law where the standard of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt."
If you want a debate, stop sidestepping and look straight at the contradictions

Two seperate sources claiming the same thing would literally have to be collusion and intentional fabrication. Also you literally called them lies and the schizodoc you're posting claims the same thing. Stop lying and backpeddling on your claims

Wanna know the funniest part? IS THAT I LITERALLY DID THAT MULTIPLE TIMES LMAO BUT YOU DIDNT READ IT BECAUSE YOU'RE A SCARED LITTLE CUCK, I CITED TABARI'S BOOK WHICH IS KNOWN KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK

>Google docs with bible maths is prominent unbiased historians from historical journals
this brown person literally cannot read

 

[Alextremo2TheMax]

They literally made England and France with their discoveries come to the new world and make empires based off Spain’s model which we lead to and make way for Modern Western European civilization as we see it today retard

If they based it off of spain's model they would have stagnated and got raped by the natives like the spanish did

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

If they based it off of spain's model they would have stagnated and got raped by the natives like the spanish did

Uhh meds the Spaniards were the ones raping natives that’s why Mesoamericans and South Americans aswell as Mexicans have Iberian DNA also the English and French empires were built off the Spanish model aswell as Spain literally discovering that land and exposing it to Europe

 

[Alextremo2TheMax]

Uhh meds the Spaniards were the ones raping natives that’s why Mesoamericans and South Americans aswell as Mexicans have Iberian DNA also the English and French empires were built off the Spanish model aswell as Spain literally discovering that land and exposing it to Europe

>Mixing with slaves means we were the ones raping
They lost in america doe

 

[Meliton Manzanas]

>Mixing with slaves means we were the ones raping
They lost in america doe

You’re honestly so retarded and are denying basic history I knew since I was 6 and that is common knowledge that everyone knows

 

[Warrior-Z]

Two seperate sources claiming the same thing would literally have to be collusion and intentional fabrication. Also you literally called them lies and the schizodoc you're posting claims the same thing. Stop lying and backpeddling on your claims

Two sources backing up each other don’t automatically mean “collusion”. You’re simply presuming that because they match, they’re unquestionable. That’s not how history works. Multiple narratives may still be wrong or misrepresenting things. And no, I didn’t call them lies, I assessed the interpretation based on the evidence available. Stop spinning this and actually address the timeline and contradictions.

>Google docs with bible maths is prominent unbiased historians from historical journals
this brown person literally cannot read

Oh and btw prove Al-Tabari wrote that google doc because he existed even before the internet lole.

 

[jimbo]

@jimbo Tell them about my huge penis

it's very huge yes yes