VOTE! The REAL Thrembo....

[Warrior-Z]

False Dichotomy fallacy

Prove that rq.

@SmallAnus MODS he's erping

Hows that erping bitch?

Since you have provided no reasoning for why any of the hadiths only relate to specific case of idolatry, I can just dismiss it entirely

To disregard hundreds of years of nuanced scholarship simply because you don’t feel like engaging with the background is just lazy LMAOOO. The important not here is that scholars like Ibn Hamdan and Al-Nawawi did not just pick idolatry for its own sake retard, they legit evaluated the chains of transmission, the historical context, and the meaning that was intended, including wanting to use the selected hadiths to make a distinction cuck ass slut. Their arguments show that the harsh language was directed against idolatry and making complete statues, and not for all forms of image or drawing. If you cannot see this then your justification for dismissal is actually a lack of intellectual debate on your part.

 

[Warrior-Z]

@meijak Shut yo bitch ass up everybody in your house are my slaves son they follow my orders and your father missing his left testicle cuck ass loser.

 

[dino]

Prove that rq.

Reverse Burden of Proof Fallacy

 

[Warrior-Z]

Reverse Burden of Proof Fallacy

How's that the case retard?

 

[Warrior-Z]

@meijak Yo my son stop being so slow slut go ahead and say sum bitch.

 

[Mr. Thrembo 88]

Everyone report him for rule 4. He's derailing the discussion of this thread (who's the real Thrembo [hint: it's me])

 

[Gigafly]

To disregard hundreds of years of nuanced scholarship simply because you don’t feel like engaging with the background is just lazy LMAOOO. The important not here is that scholars like Ibn Hamdan and Al-Nawawi did not just pick idolatry for its own sake retard, they legit evaluated the chains of transmission, the historical context, and the meaning that was intended, including wanting to use the selected hadiths to make a distinction cuck ass slut. Their arguments show that the harsh language was directed against idolatry and making complete statues, and not for all forms of image or drawing. If you cannot see this then your justification for dismissal is actually a lack of intellectual debate on your part.

And they still stated that their opinion isn't indisputable. The chains of transmissions are pretty clear, that hadith was narrated by Aisha, there isn't a lot of opportunities for the story to change much. I don't see anything in what you quoted that is relevant to the "historical context and the meaning was intended", so I'm guessing you're arguing based off nothing

 

[Warrior-Z]

View attachment 172796

Sent a 'jak made by Zionist-Y.

 

[baqqrih]

Dont call me your man, pussy, I am your master. Now kneel cuck.

It took twenty-three pages and now they're doing slave roleplay

 

[meijak]

@meijak Yo my son stop being so slow slut go ahead and say sum bitch.

I won btw. Keep taking LZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ you fnfpedo.

 

[Warrior-Z]

And they still stated that their opinion isn't indisputable. The chains of transmissions are pretty clear, that hadith was narrated by Aisha, there isn't a lot of opportunities for the story to change much. I don't see anything in what you quoted that is relevant to the "historical context and the meaning was intended", so I'm guessing you're arguing based off nothing

Retard, learn to TRACK, just because Aisha """"reported"""" this Hadith with known chains doesn’t mean we can lock its meaning down. Scholars, including Ibn Hamdan, Al-Nawawi, and the Maliki school have done multiple readings, meaning they’ve looked at the chains, historical context, and the intended audience, and they have convincingly demonstrated that the harsh language was aimed at overt denials of monotheism, not censoring all art. Ibn Hajar, for example, in Fath al-Bari indicates that the prohibition was on complete statues that cast shadows, not drawings/sketches. Your whole mistake is taking one Hadith and ignoring centuries of nuanced scholarship. If you aren’t smart enough to realize that context matters, that's YOUR problem.

 

[Warrior-Z]

I heard he's your bull

Nope.

I won btw. Keep taking LZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ you fnfpedo.

Cuck ass bitch tryna larp me LMAOOO YOU MY SON CUCK ASS BOY YOU LOST BITCH ASS LOLIPEDO HAHA

 

[Mr. Thrembo 88]

I heard he's your bull

Batman, the punisher and Allah told me this is true. I can't post proof though cause they will heckin' murder me if I did or something like that

 

[SoySpotter]

Nope.
View attachment 172806

did you draw this or is it an edit

 

[Warrior-Z]

It took twenty-three pages and now they're doing slave roleplay

Nah I am bitching this weakling named Mei down.

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

Sent a 'jak made by Zionist-Y.
View attachment 172802

i like how the franklin tracerald is being used more

it has such gemmy potential.

 

[baqqrih]

Nah I am bitching

I can tell

 

[Warrior-Z]

I can tell

Baqqrih let's debate later.

 

[baqqrih]

Baqqrih let's debate later.

On what?

 

[Mr. Thrembo 88]

Two hours ago: mei won, I won, Chimpan-Z lost, Liquid Thrembo lost
Now: mei won, I won, Chimpan-Z lost, Liquid Thrembo lost

Nothing has changed.