thread_prefix.26 The Landfill: Derailments Found Here!

[terrycrews]

if i was a woman i would

I wouldn't because he has an ugly face

 

[Warrior-Z]

No you said anything

Why do I need to say logically all the time if I already said I think omnipotence is logical or that God cant break the laws of logic?

So why can't he make the Kratos universe again?

Because it's simply not logical within YOUR framework because you can't even substantiate how Kratos even would be Kratos without the events taking place which requires another cosmology.

 

[SUPERCELLEX]

That's not even the test, the TEST IS IN FAITH.

Yes, he can, that's why he tests us.

That's presupposing God's psychology and that he "likes" it and that it's not a test in order to review if your believers would STILL believe even after pain.

Why does he care about our faith so much anyways? If he really does he can just reach into our minds and play out the simulation without torturing people
Makes much more sense that gods are just beings that emerged from the world and have a certain level of influence over it

 

[terrycrews]

Because it's simply not logical within YOUR framework because you can't even substantiate how Kratos even would be Kratos without the events taking place which requires another cosmology.

Well let's just say that God can break the laws of logic, hypothetically. Does that solve this issue for you?

 

[Warrior-Z]

Why does he care about our faith so much anyways?

Because we're his creation and he's all-loving?

If he really does he can just reach into our minds and play out the simulation without torturing people

Then that just defeats the purpose of a test?

Makes much more sense that gods are just beings that emerged from the world and have a certain level of influence over it

That would make them the assholes according to r/amitheasshole. Also all polytheistic debaters ABSOLUTELY SUCK!

 

[jimbo]

I wouldn't because he has an ugly face

but he’s strong so he could help me with anything

 

[Warrior-Z]

Well let's just say that God can break the laws of logic, hypothetically. Does that solve this issue for you?

NO IT DOESN'T, WE CAN'T DO THAT BECAUSE SOMETHING ILLOGICAL CAN'T BE HYPOTHETICAL BECAUSE WE CANT IMAGINE P AND NOT P.

 

[jimbo]

Also all polytheistic debaters ABSOLUTELY SUCK!

erm, you can’t just assume ALL polytheistic debaters suck just because you might’ve heard some faulty arguments from SOME of them; that’s a fallacy sweatie…

 

[Warrior-Z]

erm, you can’t just assume ALL polytheistic debaters suck just because you might’ve heard some faulty arguments from SOME of them; that’s a fallacy sweatie…

That was rhetorical.

 

[Warrior-Z]

I think the p and not p argument stunlocked Terry.

 

[terrycrews]

NO IT DOESN'T, WE CAN'T DO THAT BECAUSE SOMETHING ILLOGICAL CAN'T BE HYPOTHETICAL BECAUSE WE CANT IMAGINE P AND NOT P.
View attachment 107086

If you can imagine it then you can create it into a hypothetical. Do you have no imagination?

 

[Warrior-Z]

If you can imagine it then you can create it into a hypothetical.

No you can't. Can you imagine a ball that's red and not red at the same time?

 

[terrycrews]

No you can't. Can you imagine a ball that's red and not red at the same time?

Colors are irrelevant because there are animals who can see far more colors than ours so it has nothing to do with logic. God could create a red and non red ball at the same time though yeah

 

[Warrior-Z]

Colors are irrelevant because there are animals who can see far more colors than ours

It doesn't matter because there's no contradiction with new colours, I'm talking about something that basically IS RED AND NOT RED, WHICH IS AN INHERENT CONTRADICTION. And yes it is relevant because we speak of contradictions. Also prove that God could create that.

 

[terrycrews]

It doesn't matter because there's no contradiction with new colours, I'm talking about something that basically IS RED AND NOT RED, WHICH IS AN INHERENT CONTRADICTION. And yes it is relevant because we speak of contradictions. Also prove that God could create that.

I can't even prove that he exists how am I supposed to do that. Actually why don't we do something simpler. Would you marry someone who looked like Kratos if you were a woman?

 

[jimbo]

all this over a fucking video game character

 

[SUPERCELLEX]

Because we're his creation and he's all-loving?

Then that just defeats the purpose of a test?

If he's all-loving why does he need to 'test' us like a paranoid girlfriend

That would make them the assholes according to r/amitheasshole. Also all polytheistic debaters ABSOLUTELY SUCK!

No it would make them doing their job.

 

[Warrior-Z]

I can't even prove that he exists how am I supposed to do that.

W concession.

Would you marry someone who looked like Kratos if you were a woman?

Took you THAT long to make a logically coherent hypothetical.

 

[jimbo]

Took you THAT long to make a logically coherent hypothetical.

…so would you?

 

[terrycrews]

W concession.

Yes I will concede that I can't prove the unprovable.

Took you THAT long to make a logically coherent hypothetical

Will you answer it this time?