- Joined
- Nov 23, 2024
- Messages
- 5,764
how do I lock a /dump/ thread?No we are debating if Warrior-Z, if he was a woman, would marry Kratos or not
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
how do I lock a /dump/ thread?No we are debating if Warrior-Z, if he was a woman, would marry Kratos or not
I am not baiting I am curiouswe're baiting warrior 'p
I disagree on that. I said anything logically possible so that's NOT backtracking, are you dumb?You yourself said that omnipotence isn't above the laws of logic so are you backpedaling now or is it not "ANYTHING"? In my opinion God could make 2+2 = 5 but you disagree?
That's not even the test, the TEST IS IN FAITH.Why does that nigger need to test us if he's truely omniscient?
Yes, he can, that's why he tests us.Can't he tell if we love him?
That's presupposing God's psychology and that he "likes" it and that it's not a test in order to review if your believers would STILL believe even after pain.Again, that makes me think of dystheism, that he wants us to simp for him cause he's a narcissistic nigger who likes seeing people who like him suffer.
>curiousI am not baiting I am curious
I never agreed to this. In my opening statement I said polytheism makes more senseMe and Terry presupposed that the monotheistic God is a necessary being so that isn't applicable right now.
if i was a woman i wouldNo we are debating if Warrior-Z, if he was a woman, would marry Kratos or not
No you said anything, you didn't qualify it with 'logically'. Not that it matters because having a universal level of omnipotence over a universe is very much in the power of God because he can do anything (logically). So why can't he make the Kratos universe again?I disagree on that. I said anything logically possible so that's NOT backtracking, are you dumb?
Can you read? I said ME AND TERRY, not ME AND YOU.I never agreed to this. In my opening statement I said polytheism makes more sense
I wouldn't because he has an ugly faceif i was a woman i would
Why do I need to say logically all the time if I already said I think omnipotence is logical or that God cant break the laws of logic?No you said anything
Because it's simply not logical within YOUR framework because you can't even substantiate how Kratos even would be Kratos without the events taking place which requires another cosmology.So why can't he make the Kratos universe again?
Why does he care about our faith so much anyways? If he really does he can just reach into our minds and play out the simulation without torturing peopleThat's not even the test, the TEST IS IN FAITH.
Yes, he can, that's why he tests us.
That's presupposing God's psychology and that he "likes" it and that it's not a test in order to review if your believers would STILL believe even after pain.
Well let's just say that God can break the laws of logic, hypothetically. Does that solve this issue for you?Because it's simply not logical within YOUR framework because you can't even substantiate how Kratos even would be Kratos without the events taking place which requires another cosmology.
Because we're his creation and he's all-loving?Why does he care about our faith so much anyways?
Then that just defeats the purpose of a test?If he really does he can just reach into our minds and play out the simulation without torturing people
That would make them the assholes according to r/amitheasshole. Also all polytheistic debaters ABSOLUTELY SUCK!Makes much more sense that gods are just beings that emerged from the world and have a certain level of influence over it
but he’s strong so he could help me with anythingI wouldn't because he has an ugly face
NO IT DOESN'T, WE CAN'T DO THAT BECAUSE SOMETHING ILLOGICAL CAN'T BE HYPOTHETICAL BECAUSE WE CANT IMAGINE P AND NOT P.Well let's just say that God can break the laws of logic, hypothetically. Does that solve this issue for you?
erm, you can’t just assume ALL polytheistic debaters suck just because you might’ve heard some faulty arguments from SOME of them; that’s a fallacy sweatie…Also all polytheistic debaters ABSOLUTELY SUCK!
That was rhetorical.erm, you can’t just assume ALL polytheistic debaters suck just because you might’ve heard some faulty arguments from SOME of them; that’s a fallacy sweatie…
If you can imagine it then you can create it into a hypothetical. Do you have no imagination?NO IT DOESN'T, WE CAN'T DO THAT BECAUSE SOMETHING ILLOGICAL CAN'T BE HYPOTHETICAL BECAUSE WE CANT IMAGINE P AND NOT P.
View attachment 107086