@' me in the post, I want to read it.
I ended up exceeding the maximum character limit, this is part 1 and part 2 will be posted right after this
To understand why the centralization/normification of the internet is not the only reason why it seems so much worse right now, we need to first understand 2 very different archetypes of internet users, which I will refer to as "relatives" and "quirkies" in this post to not use previously existing terms that don't entirely accurately describe them. Also, many internet users have traits of both or neither category, since if they didn't there would be practically no reason for someone to talk about the 2 problems associated with these 2 archetypes
First, these are some characteristics of "relatives"
- Never use adblockers or reader mode
- Generally inept with technology, even including something as simple as web browsers
- When posting an article on another site, they might actually click the "share" widgets at the bottom of it rather than copying the link
- Spend most of their online time on branded, massive, and public sites such as twitter (using the app, not the website), Facebook, mobile reddit (almost only browsing the front page or clicking on links that already exist, rarely searching), spotify, yahoo news (even though yahoo news just steals articles from other sources and condenses them into a boomer-friendly format), and tiktok.
- In extreme cases, some of them might act as if Facebook is the entire internet
- Often use their real name and have no concern for privacy, and get very suspicious if you say you have "no social media"
- Almost unable to understand the concept of talking about different things online than you talk about in person
- This applies in reverse too, when interacting with "quirkies" or users who do not fall into either category relatives will act very suspicious if they ask "so, what do you do online?" and do not get an answer.
- Usually boomers, gen x, or millennials
- Examples of communities mainly composed of relatives include LinkedIn, Facebook, r/aww, instagram, and the comment section of most news articles
- Most third-worlders are closer to the category of relatives than quirkies, despite what certain slopjaks imply.
In contrast, here are some characteristics of "quirkies":
- Care a lot about privacy, but still post information that can easily be used against them
- In some cases, they dislike others screenshotting or archiving their posts without permission, and consider this harassment by itself even if nobody comments on the original post, and have rules for how anyone should be allowed to interact with them ( DNI)
- Unlike relatives, they really like and often know a lot about "Weird/Obscure Thing"s
- This often brings them into direct conflict with users like us (schloggers are much closer to quirkies than relatives, aside from having opposite opinions on e-politics)
- Usually millennials, zoomers, or gen alpha
- More likely to be neurodivergent, or at least effectively have self-imposed ADHD as a result of the conditions that have surrounded them for their entire life.
- Much more interested in fandom communities, and often create fanworks of their own
- Despite being very involved in an artform that only exists by building onto previous works, quirkies often fanatically hate anything to do with AI, claiming that it steals their work/livelihood.
- Communities mainly populated by quirkies include r/196, Tumblr, and fandom.com
Now that I've explained these 2 archetypes, I will explain how they create 2 very different problems for people who are very deeply online (this means something different from terminally online since it refers to the obscurity of content viewed rather than the duration of viewing content; "doomscrollers" are terminally online but not deeply online, someone who only posts once a week on an obscure forum and then closes the internet would hypothetically be deeply online but not terminally online, although almost everyone who is deeply online is also terminally online).
Obviously, relatives have allowed the mainstream internet to be filled with celebrity gossip, buzzfeed-tier reposting of content that wasn't good the first time, and smalltalk that isn't even necessary in real life, much less on the internet. In addition, most discussion is on extremely large, general-purpose but low-quality sites, such as twitter or facebook, and important people will often make announcements this way (thoughbeit Elon Musk buying X greatly reduced the trend of people with both online and IRL importance making public statements via twitter, it's still seen as the default site to use for it by many people). However, schloggers are much likely to be part of, or at least browse, more obscure communities. These communities often start out on a search-indexable site, such as a forum, wiki, or a subreddit. Inevitably, quirkies in the community will try to make the site more "safe" (invite-only), "moderated" (installing jannies to make sure that left-wing politics is always considered on-topic), and "accepting" (inviting new quirkies who like the topic just because their friends recommended it, and then kicking out users who refuse to conform to the standards of the new users). A great pre-internet example of this is tabletop gaming as well as other mostly-male hobbies, as seen in the following image, but this image is relatively inaccurate now since troons now take the role that women previously took in the image, since unlike troons, women are not exclusively degrading to a community, but most of the women who do not degrade a community are not identifiable as women due to understanding how to act online rather than attempting to use IRL social skills.
Back to the topic of discord and why it presents a completely different problem from the centralization of the internet, I would like to include quotes from this archived /v/ thread as an example of the cliqueiness of discord and why it is different from the mass internet.
arch.b4k.co
> Not indexable, meaning you have to search within discord. I less you know to go there, you have no chance of finding it.
> No straightforward search/response to issues or organization of topics. Once within discord it is stupid.
> All forum content is beholden to a single technology vendor, and when it inevitably dies (or changes its own policies) we will lose access to the history.
> Single identity tied across multiple discussion topics/games, leading to the rise of 'local celebrities', 'lolcows' and general reddit-style karmawhoring and post shaming.
Discord vs Forums is basically Fandom vs actual wikis.
Forums had their celebrities and circle jerks too, but it wasn't the same forced shit, it wasn't as generic and people were FAR less motivated by it.
>For me, it was...
>join discord
>everyone is sucking (local celebrity)'s cock nonstop
>try to talk about the topic of the server (insert videogame)
>get banned
>Reason: "Off topic. All discussions belong in the BingusBongus channel"
It's like trying to use Skype to research the American Revolution.
(in response to someone asking why using discord as a pseudo-wiki is bad without buzzwords)
>discord
>can't find shit because discord isn't made for that, have to ask question
>have to wait until nothing else is being discussed since any question will be buried instantly if there's some other topic
>someone has to be willing to answer my inane question for the billionth time
>have to hope someone else doesn't answer a different question that buries mine
vs
>forums
>search
>find information
No it's not. I can search a forum and react to a ten year old topic.
Discord is for people who unirionically want to make friends online and belong to a community it's not about information. It's women chattering at the hair dressing salon.