Texas made lolicon a felony

[Gigafly]

No, it wasn't. It was a parody cartoon meant to be funny. It's currently up on ED, although I am obviously not going to link to it.

Steve is gooning to it as we speak

 

[ribbon]

No, it wasn't. It was a parody cartoon meant to be funny. It's currently up on ED, although I am obviously not going to link to it.

Oops alright then.

 

[𝗠𝗞𝗖]

No, it wasn't. It was a parody cartoon meant to be funny. It's currently up on ED, although I am obviously not going to link to it.

>sir you have 50TB of child porn, correct?
<no, your honor. clearly facts and logic arent your strong suit, it's just a joke and it was never intended to be pornographic. why? because one of the child rapists dressed up as spongebob, it's a parody

 

[MoonMetropolis]

>sir you have 50TB of child porn, correct?
<no, your honor. clearly facts and logic arent your strong suit, it's just a joke and it was never intended to be pornographic. why? because one of the child rapists dressed up as spongebob, it's a parody

Are you actually suggesting that dressing real kids up as SpongeBob before raping them is even remotely the equivalent of drawing crude parody comics of Bart Simpson fucking his sister?

 

[meijak]

This is good because i hope they give loliniggers the chair but are they doing anything about the 'p containing real kids first because i keep hearing about pedophiles in the us getting like a one year sentence.

What if it just applies to pornographic/erotic depictions leaving place for clear non erotic (such as artistic or satirical depictions) because i doubt that even if it was made illegal theyd give it the same treatment as csem of real kids. I know no nigga is getting jailed for cp for having a bart simpson peeing on a truck logo sticker.

I think the point is that it's hard to differentiate between these things. There is a person perma banned for linking to a wikipedia entry of an album cover and 2 people in the hole because they said he's not a pedo. There is a famous statue/fountain in Brussels, Belgium of a little boy pissing and legend says it, saving the city, I will not link it because I don't care for the hole.

 

[Gigafly]

There is a person perma banned for linking to a wikipedia entry of an album cover and 2 people in the hole because they said he's not a pedo.

Marge, was it Nevermind?

 

[meijak]

Marge, was it Nevermind?

Ytsuken.

 

[Gigafly]

Ytsuken.

No, I'm talking about the album cover

 

[𝗠𝗞𝗖]

Are you actually suggesting that dressing real kids up as SpongeBob before raping them is even remotely the equivalent of drawing crude parody comics of Bart Simpson fucking his sister?

Poor example, yeah. Fair.
I think the problem is that the legal system is built upon a black & white foundation. Reminds me a lot of the zero tolerance policies schools have now, where defending yourself can get you expelled in some areas.
I don't think someone should go to jail for drawing Greg Heffley with a 10 foot penis. It's the "blanket" ban thing that's really the issue here.

 

[meijak]

No, I'm talking about the album cover

Do you mean the sculpture? If you wanna look it up you can just use the words in my post.

 

[ribbon]

I think the point is that it's hard to differentiate between these things. There is a person perma banned for linking to a wikipedia entry of an album cover and 2 people in the hole because they said he's not a pedo. There is a famous statue/fountain in Brussels, Belgium of a little boy pissing and legend says it, saving the city, I will not link it because I don't care for the hole.

I guess so, it was mostly to counter the "well then south park would be banned" because the difference between lolicon and that is that its clear you arent meant to get hard from a south park bit.
That "nuance" doesnt apply outside of fiction because it puts real kids in danger which is what should be prioritized to fight agaisnt, which is what ytsuken kinda did. The album cover was portraying in an erotic manner a REAL kid. One makes you a pedophile and the other makes you an active offending pedophile, the distribution of irl csem creates demand for more child abuse. Lolicon may not have an "active victim" from its consumption but getting hard to a depiction of a child does make you a pedophile whether its fictional or not. It just means you havent molested anyone yet but i wouldnt let that nigga babysit my kid.

 

[meijak]

I guess so, it was mostly to counter the "well then south park would be banned" because the difference between lolicon and that is that its clear you arent meant to get hard from a south park bit.
That "nuance" doesnt apply outside of fiction because it puts real kids in danger which is what should be prioritized to fight agaisnt, which is what ytsuken kinda did. The album cover was portraying in an erotic manner a REAL kid. One makes you a pedophile and the other makes you an active offending pedophile, the distribution of irl csem creates demand for more child abuse. Lolicon may not have an "active victim" from its consumption but getting hard to a depiction of a child does make you a pedophile whether its fictional or not. It just means you havent molested anyone yet but i wouldnt let that nigga babysit my kid.

I don't think Ytsuken was portraying it as a positive, I think he was trying to show how fucked up it is in his own retarded way. Like knowing that the album cover exists doesn't make you a pedo and it's haram in most of the civilized world, barring most importantly US of A.

I think he's talking about the album

I am not aching for a ban so I will zip it.

 

[ribbon]

I don't think Ytsuken was portraying it as a positive, I think he was trying to show how fucked up it is in his own retarded way. Like knowing that the album cover exists doesn't make you a pedo and it's haram in most of the civilized world, barring most importantly US of A.

yeah i think he was retarded for linking it either way.

 

[meijak]

yeah i think he was retarded for linking it either way.

He's just generally retarded.

 

[SoySpotter]

I don't think Ytsuken was portraying it as a positive, I think he was trying to show how fucked up it is in his own retarded way. Like knowing that the album cover exists doesn't make you a pedo and it's haram in most of the civilized world, barring most importantly US of A.

I agree, but I think it was incredibly retarded of him to do that. It is also weird he posted that without thinking twice, there had to be some level of desensitization in him to do that.

 

[meijak]

I agree, but I think it was incredibly retarded of him to do that. It is also weird he posted that without thinking twice, there had to be some level of desensitization in him to do that.

Yeah, I mean posting any nudity here is fucking stupid. There are children on this forum.

 

[SoySpotter]

Okay so I see a nigger saying this is a bad thing. I know he's retarded and also thought Soylita was the most "pleasant" soyjak to look at even though soyjaks are meant to be grostesque and mock numales but I digress. This law should've been done before. Free speech my ass because you can already get imprisoned for free speech if it doesn't suit the US government.

@MoonMetropolis, by your logic, AI CP is fine because it harms no one. You are a stupid nigger. Pedophilia is what's harming kids in the first place. Lolicon is creating demand for the actual thing because pedophiles do move up to the real thing. Your view of ethics is so flawed you see things one dimensionally instead of understanding cause and effect.

This will never affect the average citizen at all, so I don't see the issue with this. I don't see why you have a problem with this law, or why you think there's a slippery slope when in reality nothing happens after lolicon gets banned. Why are you fearmongering and why are you pretending the US won't just put you on a watchlist or even revoke your citizenship because of the patriot act? If anything I would rather the government be obsessed with obscenity laws than silencing political dissidents


Yes. Because the whole reason kids get sexually abused is because of pedophilia. Pedophiles enable other pedophiles. Remember NAMBLA? Everyone made a big deal over it.. But I thought... Oh my god I thought saying you want to molest kids is... FREE SPEECH!!!!

This law would also force platforms to start banning these freaks. It's not like the government will immediately focus all of their resources of lolicon. It just makes it illegal to have in the same way weed is or alcohol during the prohibition. It essentially removes the whole "it's legal" argument from those pedophiles


The album cover is way worse. The pedophiles were trying to tip toe on the red line really bad and it backfired around the world except the US


Lolicon is the equivalent of smoking advertisers that target kids. It will generate demand for the real because pedophiles like kids, whether real or fictional. It's being proactive rather than reactive

keyed

BUT HOLY DILATION

 

[Soynic Hedgehog]

OCD isn't real. You're making it up for attention.

>Its not real because I saw some tiktok girls saying they had a mental illness for attention, so that means nobody can develop mental illnesses because I'm an ignorant little chudcel. I am also a pedophile and advocate for baby monkey totrure and discord, and anyone who giga quotes me is endorsing all of these things.

 

[Fagon]

>banning lolicon good ev&oe i want to watch southpark or some burger

 

[ribbon]

Lolicon is the equivalent of smoking advertisers that target kids. It will generate demand for the real because pedophiles like kids, whether real or fictional. It's being proactive rather than reactive

i 100% agree, thats why i do think lolicon should be banned.

>banning lolicon good ev&oe i want to watch southpark or some burger

Most of the episodes where butters gets raped suck anyway those can go