Of course subjective morality doesn't exist. That's exactly the point that I'm making, retard. The constitution exists so that you don't have the right to impose your own personal definition of petty morality on the rest of the country.
I don't know about the Swedish law against lolicon, but Swedish censorship laws have definitely been abused countless times. Remember Dan Park, for example?
I certainly have nothing positive to say about our hate speech legislation. Itβs pure censorship and should be completely abolished. What I meant is that the situation when it comes to lolicon specifically is completely different here and in america and I feel like I shouldnβt talk about it because american culture causes problems that donβt exist here.
Dont do this unless youre prepared to see a shit ton of flies
When life gives you flies, grind them into fly pellets and sell them as bird/reptile/fish feed
Friendly faces everywhere humble folk without temptation
I think the issue is that all the laws are written as omnibus packages written on 6 thrembillion pages and not one of the people voting on them having read one. No law should be more than a page long, so the electorate can actually understand what is being passed.
This is Aryan shemmycuck
What if it just applies to pornographic/erotic depictions leaving place for clear non erotic (such as artistic or satirical depictions) because i doubt that even if it was made illegal theyd give it the same treatment as csem of real kids. I know no nigga is getting jailed for cp for having a bart simpson peeing on a truck logo sticker.
OCD isn't real. You're making it up for attention.
blud thinks he a supercomputer, when he just a TI-82
The sharty isn't real. None of this is real wake up agent 109 the squirrel is eating nuts amongst the copreses of his former bothers
True, but some people are such amoral pieces of shit that they equate 'p and criticizing migration as the same, so they think that 'p MUST be legal or no other rights count.
This exact same thing has been struck down as unconstitutional many times before. Organizations like the ACLU and the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund will indubitably challenge this law in the courts as well.
thats simpson toddler incest porn that someones meant to jack their weiner too bra not bart simpson pissing on a truck logo.Simpsons cartoon rip-off is child porn: judge
A NSW Supreme Court judge has ruled an internet cartoon in which lookalike child characters from The Simpsons engage in sexual acts is child pornography.www.theage.com.au
No, it wasn't. It was a parody cartoon meant to be funny. It's currently up on ED, although I am obviously not going to link to it.
