Is it possible to be anti-capitalist from a right-wing perspective?

Any politics that is founded upon the values of the "enlightenment" such as inherent rights (rights are given to you by the state and can be taken away at any time), equality of man (divine right of kings, the strong should rule the weak, mandate of heaven type shit), etc are too left-wing in my opinion. This includes right-libertarianism, American "conservatism," etc.
 
Any politics that is founded upon the values of the "enlightenment" such as inherent rights (rights are given to you by the state and can be taken away at any time), equality of man (divine right of kings, the strong should rule the weak, mandate of heaven type shit), etc are too left-wing in my opinion. This includes right-libertarianism, American "conservatism," etc.
National-Socialism.
 
National-Socialism.
Yes, it's possible. Someone already said National-Socialism, so another example would be Sharia law.
False nuke. National Socialism is inherently pro-enlightenment because it embraces ideas from it. (Both socialism and nationalism trace their intellectual origins back to the enlightenment) If you were truly against the enlightenment and french revolution you'd be in favor of traditional empires instead of nation states. Absolute monarchy is the actual "return to tradition". Nazism is merely another modern idea in a sea of modern ideas. Sharia would count as anti-enlightenment though obviously.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
leftists love crapitalism doe, many leftoids, including marx xerself praised crapitalism because xe saw the opportunity to deconstruct the traditional order, which allow (((globohomos))) to control the world.
Marx liked capitalism as the synthesis of the contradiction between the aristocracy and bourgeoisie, not because it allowed zog to control the world o algo
 
False nuke. National Socialism is inherently pro-enlightenment because it embraces ideas from it. (Both socialism and nationalism trace their intellectual origins back to the enlightenment) If you were truly against the enlightenment and french revolution you'd be in favor of traditional empires instead of nation states. Absolute monarchy is the actual "return to tradition". Nazism is merely another modern idea in a sea of modern ideas. Sharia would count as anti-enlightenment though obviously.
Correct, But the Nazi Government didn't like the French-Revolution and it's Ideals. The Reason why I support it is due to it trying to destroy the Jewish-NWO; I like Monarchy but The Nazi-Government was a Front against Jewish-Degeneracy and ultimatley would have re-installed Monarchy.
 
Also the most Farthest of Right Ideologies like National-Socialism, Fascism, Falangism/Francoism, National-Syndicalism, Monarchism, Imperialism, Nativism, Sharia-Law, Caliphates, Artarky, Theocracy, Traditionalism, Traditional-Catholicism, Nationalism, are all of a furvent Anti-Capitalist breed; And infact some left-wing Ideologies like Liberalism And Republicanism are of a Pro-Capitalist breed. Also the Father of Fascism Benito Mussolini mixed nationalism with socialism to make Fascism and was inspired by some of Karl Marx's teachings; Benito Mussolini is still cool btw I like him.
 
Last edited:
Any politics that is founded upon the values of the "enlightenment" such as inherent rights (rights are given to you by the state and can be taken away at any time), equality of man (divine right of kings, the strong should rule the weak, mandate of heaven type shit), etc are too left-wing in my opinion. This includes right-libertarianism, American "conservatism," etc.
The enlightenment was both good and bad
 
Back
Top