Do you believe in the moon landing

title


  • Total voters
    37
People often underestimate the amount of work and EXACT calculations that went into making all of this happen. It's not like you could keep a couple blueprints for this and have a new rocket ready to go in a year, not after this long, nor would there be any real reason to do so.

Put simply, we have the diagrams, we know the basics, but we don't have the same experts that we did, we don't have the same factories that created the parts used, and even if we built a perfect replica of the rocket we used back then, there's no guarantee that it would be good for anything. It would have to be exact, same weight, astronauts that weight exactly the same, and that also means using old, outdated technology. Why go to space with that? What would we gain from doing that? If they find a reason to go back, they'll be doing it with new stuff, and it will be expensive as hell, just like last time.
 
People often underestimate the amount of work and EXACT calculations that went into making all of this happen. It's not like you could keep a couple blueprints for this and have a new rocket ready to go in a year, not after this long, nor would there be any real reason to do so.

Put simply, we have the diagrams, we know the basics, but we don't have the same experts that we did, we don't have the same factories that created the parts used, and even if we built a perfect replica of the rocket we used back then, there's no guarantee that it would be good for anything. It would have to be exact, same weight, astronauts that weight exactly the same, and that also means using old, outdated technology. Why go to space with that? What would we gain from doing that? If they find a reason to go back, they'll be doing it with new stuff, and it will be expensive as hell, just like last time.
Competency has been in decline fore decades. I don't doubt for a minute that contemporary scientists would fuck up even if they created a 1 to 1 replica.
 
People often underestimate the amount of work and EXACT calculations that went into making all of this happen. It's not like you could keep a couple blueprints for this and have a new rocket ready to go in a year, not after this long, nor would there be any real reason to do so.

Put simply, we have the diagrams, we know the basics, but we don't have the same experts that we did, we don't have the same factories that created the parts used, and even if we built a perfect replica of the rocket we used back then, there's no guarantee that it would be good for anything. It would have to be exact, same weight, astronauts that weight exactly the same, and that also means using old, outdated technology. Why go to space with that? What would we gain from doing that? If they find a reason to go back, they'll be doing it with new stuff, and it will be expensive as hell, just like last time.
A couple blueprints? How about blueprints for every single thing made, no designs made it from a noggin straight into a product. If we had the capability 50 years ago, running on a smartphone worth of computing power, how the fuck did we not only FAIL to advance, but LOSE capability? We live in an age of literacy, knowledge doesn't die with people, the whole idea that the people who made the first rocket were some once in a century geniuses who cannot be replicated it absurd.
And aren't we still launching rockets anyways? We got the rover on mars supposedly, we got people in orbit (evendoe fake) it really only seems like sending people to the moon is what we seem to be so lost on, weirdly enough. Someone's bullshitting something here.
I get you're invested in the topic, but none of this shit makes any sense
Where do you think the rocket went? Do you think it launched before disappearing entirely?
No, it hit the Dome and caused the heavens to strike it down in retaliation
 
A couple blueprints? How about blueprints for every single thing made, no designs made it from a noggin straight into a product. If we had the capability 50 years ago, running on a smartphone worth of computing power, how the fuck did we not only FAIL to advance, but LOSE capability? We live in an age of literacy, knowledge doesn't die with people, the whole idea that the people who made the first rocket were some once in a century geniuses who cannot be replicated it absurd.
And aren't we still launching rockets anyways? We got the rover on mars supposedly, we got people in orbit (evendoe fake) it really only seems like sending people to the moon is what we seem to be so lost on, weirdly enough. Someone's bullshitting something here.
I get you're invested in the topic, but none of this shit makes any sense

No, it hit the Dome and caused the heavens to strike it down in retaliation
People no longer care about space travel. Only reason people cared was because of the cold war. Nowadays its a nothingburger or something
 
I would believe it if they died on the moon but the idea they came back after getting there is just retarded lol.
 
People no longer care about space travel. Only reason people cared was because of the cold war. Nowadays its a nothingburger or something
If that was the case we wouldn't be getting fed the story of them being unable to travel back, they'd just tell us they don't give a shit.
I mean c'mon, 20 million dollars a day for a "nothingburger"?
 
A couple blueprints? How about blueprints for every single thing made, no designs made it from a noggin straight into a product. If we had the capability 50 years ago, running on a smartphone worth of computing power, how the fuck did we not only FAIL to advance, but LOSE capability? We live in an age of literacy, knowledge doesn't die with people, the whole idea that the people who made the first rocket were some once in a century geniuses who cannot be replicated it absurd.
And aren't we still launching rockets anyways? We got the rover on mars supposedly, we got people in orbit (evendoe fake) it really only seems like sending people to the moon is what we seem to be so lost on, weirdly enough. Someone's bullshitting something here.
I get you're invested in the topic, but none of this shit makes any sense

No, it hit the Dome and caused the heavens to strike it down in retaliation
We know what the parts and schematics of a WW2 fighter are but we don't have factories producing any more of them. That's what losing the technology means
these are the schematics for the Saturn V btw
 
A couple blueprints? How about blueprints for every single thing made, no designs made it from a noggin straight into a product. If we had the capability 50 years ago, running on a smartphone worth of computing power, how the fuck did we not only FAIL to advance, but LOSE capability? We live in an age of literacy, knowledge doesn't die with people, the whole idea that the people who made the first rocket were some once in a century geniuses who cannot be replicated it absurd.
And aren't we still launching rockets anyways? We got the rover on mars supposedly, we got people in orbit (evendoe fake) it really only seems like sending people to the moon is what we seem to be so lost on, weirdly enough. Someone's bullshitting something here.
I get you're invested in the topic, but none of this shit makes any sense
There are a lot more variables than you think there are, not only in technology, but in the political climate as well. The country is not pushing to go to the moon like it was back then,. If we had an entire country behind this, we could do it a lot faster, but we do not.
The weight here is much heavier on there being no reason for them to do it, as well as no large-scale push to make it happen. It's possible, but we don't currently have the means.
 
We know what the parts and schematics of a WW2 plane are but we don't have factories producing any more of them. That's what losing the technology means
these are the schematics for the Saturn V
Maybe if ww2 reenactors got 20 million dollars a day we'd see a resurgence in Stuka production
There are a lot more variables than you think there are, not only in technology, but in the political climate as well. The country is not pushing to go to the moon like it was back then,. If we had an entire country behind this, we could do it a lot faster, but we do not.
The weight here is much heavier on there being no reason for them to do it, as well as no large-scale push to make it happen. It's possible, but we don't currently have the means.
This is where you just lose me
>It's really hard with a lot of complexities but we were able to do it before but we failed to sufficiently preserve the technical knowhow to replicate it but we could if we wanted to or something
The narrative is just unconvincing, I mean 20 million dollars every day of the week of every month of every year and that's all they got?!
 
The moon landing is obviously real. Commies, jews and third worlders would be seething at NASA if it wasn't. This is doubly true since most of the people who worked on Saturn V were National Socialists, including Werner Von Braun.

Why haven't they gone back? Simple. NASA ran out of nazis.
 
I hate NATOtroons as much as the next chud, but bragging about shooting down 1 plane from the American Airforce is pretty sad.
Especially since the US still turned your country to rubble.
considering it's the only instance of the stealth aircraft ever being shot down, being shot down in a country where they had total air superiority, being shot down with ancient equipment, by a country 120 times smaller, I'd say it's well earned bragging rights.
I mean what did you expect of a country going up against NATO? A full out invasion taking place on USA's soil?
 
considering it's the only instance of the stealth aircraft ever being shot down, being shot down in a country where they had total air superiority, being shot down with ancient equipment, by a country 120 times smaller, I'd say it's well earned bragging rights.
I mean what did you expect of a country going up against NATO? A full out invasion taking place on USA's soil?
In the grand scheme of things, it's irrelevant. It's not like shooting down said plane had any real impact on America in the long term. It's like a Mosquito making you stub your toe. It might be impressive for the mosquito, but it doesn't affect you in the long term, outside of a short term minor annoyance.

Again people who shill for NATO are the biggest faggots on the internet. They are smug and smarmy yet get mad if you have the slightest disagreement with them. They are wrong all the time and make obviously dumb mistakes yet refuse to admit the slightest of faults. Look at Laserpig or Kraut or any of those faggots. They make unironically make lesbian feminists seem rational. I hate them 1000 times more than the most autistic Serb or Russian defender. I just don't see how anyone from the States, pro NATO or not, is going to get but hurt over loosing one plane.
 
Back
Top