/DJT/ - THE DQNALD GENERAL

_account said:
Did the settlers introduce natives to the concept of scalping?🤔 Did the Spanish introduce natives to mass human sacrifice?🤔
Click to expand...
No, and no, and although not on the level of mass human sacrifice, people somehow coming up with new barbaric ways of killing others, with "justified" moral reason or no reason at all just happens regardless of the culture.
Say, look at medieval England, like people who were "Hanged, drawn, and quartered" and although they were initially accused of high treason prior to being killed, to go that far in such a brutal execution is pretty gnarly, especially when most death row inmates nowadays get lethal injection and that's it.
 
baqqrih said:
Seeing as it no longer directly pertains to Donald Trump, it'd be best if this conversation regarding the Amerindians continued outside of the President's general thread, for the sake of organization.
Click to expand...
I'm willing to let this die, I don't care about this native crap
 
1740242580632.png


THIS IS THE YEAR OF THE DONALD
 
I'll admit, I'm surprised how much he's doing and has been doing for the past month, I genuinely thought he and his cabinet were just going to repeat his last four years in office, but the fact that he and his administration are targeting both the political aspects, and more importantly, the long lasting social change is pretty surreal.
I initially thought the highlight of his second term would've been Robert F. Kennedy Jr; thinking he would have the most impact in the long term by ridding the foods we consume of unnecessary chemicals, dyes, high fructose corn syrup, among other unnecessary additives that only stagnate the health of the population without them knowing or realizing it, which is fucked up because we have a right to know exactly what they're putting into our food, and although we technically do if we read the label, what do these chemicals actually do to us and how do they "benefit" our bodies by putting them into our food, and into the food that our own children consume. How have their bodies been affected as a result of eating literal sludge and slop all their life?

But I'm really curious about the next three years of his presidency since he and his administration are trying to do as much as possible as early as they can, especially how well he'll do in the midterms. I'm hoping he isn't just trying get as much done early on just so he doesn't have to do anything later on, and that he'll keep the ball rolling even into his final days in office.
Hopefully doing even more than what he and the administration have done so far already, rather than an equal amount from beginning to end. I'm also hoping that the impact will have longevity and won't just be completely eroded and reversed by 2028 or 2032.
The progressives have had a grip on the United States social upheaval for nearly two decades, thirty if you want to include Bill Clinton and him turning the Oval Office into the Oral Office.
 
FartmingerFuckwadCheeseSte said:
The progressives have had a grip on the United States social upheaval for nearly two decades, thirty if you want to include Bill Clinton and him turning the Oval Office into the Oral Office.
Click to expand...
Because please explain to me in simple terms how this in any way, shape or form is "progress"? In what fucked up world is this an "achievement" or "valid", why are these people fighting to make this legal and KEEP it legal, how is this moral in any way?
Instead of Occupy Wall Street, they now wanna butcher the bodies of disabled people under a phony agenda.
They're trying to mind fuck you into submission.
1740257565864.png
 
1740270700163.png

- Pete Buttigieg, 2025. [For context; he ran as a nominee candidate for the Democratic Party back in the 2020]

Although he said the right thing when he stated; "If we were more serious about the actual values and not caught up in vocabularies and trying to cater everybody only in terms of their particular slice of combinations of identities versus the shared project."

It's still dishonest and he wouldn't have said that if Kamala had won, as he has to save face for both himself and his party's sake under the new administration, and now they all have to figure out what the fuck they're going to do to win people over in 2028.
He's on the side of dialing it back a bit, but there's still many of them who still want to double down.

Even then, in an earlier quote right before the picrel statements, he sugarcoated the intentions of neo-progressive values, deflecting from the worst aspects and trying to spin the narrative that it was all for the greater good; "If that comes to your workplace with the best of intentions but doesn’t actually get at what we’re doing, what actually matters here, what’s actually at stake."

Bullshit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Zondien
Rant Doomposting general
Replies
5
Views
74
dewott
dewott
LORD CHUDTEMANTE
thread_prefix.23 Hutu Power general
Replies
7
Views
123
dewott
dewott
𝗠𝗞𝗖
thread_prefix.19 /PBG/ - PRESIDENT BIDEN GENERAL
Replies
2
Views
63
Sloppyjakky
Sloppyjakky
Gigafly
/antifa/ general
Replies
11
Views
183
JimmieCobson
JimmieCobson
JimmieCobson
Discussion /Vote/ - Election General
2
Replies
36
Views
285
ESLGod
ESLGod
Back
Top