- Joined
- Mar 6, 2024
- Messages
- 7,527
That’s a part of my point.where would the appalachians go?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That’s a part of my point.where would the appalachians go?
make them go to jimbo's house(somewhere in georgia)Southern California, obviously.
I never advocated for deporting indians, I said they should require a passport to leave their nation and not be allowed to vote in American politics.That’s a part of my point.
Agreed, the only ones I like are the black Hebrew Israelites because they have the funniest loreno, but someone needs to stop these imports claiming to be "da original nativez n shieeettt"
View attachment 152376
Ah, I thought you were arguing for their deportation.I never advocated for deporting indians, I said they should require a passport to leave their nation and not be allowed to vote in American politics.
oh definitely, they're dragging us and the hispanics to their bs too. i like seeing their mental gymnastics on how they were the hebrews and such.Agreed, the only ones I like are the black Hebrew Israelites because they have the funniest lore
There's a video of one schizomaxxing at a GarandThumb video but I can't find itAgreed, the only ones I like are the black Hebrew Israelites because they have the funniest lore
There's a video of one schizomaxxing at a GarandThumb video but I can't find it
![]()
The Indian Citizenship Act at 100 Years Old - Native American Rights Fund
This article originally appeared in the NARF Legal Review, Vol #49 No. 1 The Promise of Citizenship One hundred years ago, on June 2, 1924, the United States government conferred citizenship on Native American people by passing the Snyder Act, also known as the Indian Citizenship Act. Prior to...narf.org
i mean.. we are literally americans, genetically speaking.
we have been citizens since 1924 and we cannot be denaturalized as we are classified as natural-born citizens.
![]()
Denaturalization US Citizenship | Free Case Evaluation
Green card holders naturalized citizens can lose their citizenship under specific legal circumstances. Learn About Denaturalization US Citizenship.www.lawfirm1.com
No group is truly aboriginal or native to a land, it is through being the first known and documented group that is declared as such, and even then land can be "traded" through various ethnicites, usually by colonization and domination, but also by growing the country into an empire, thus expanding it's ethnic reach in name only.You shouldn't be.
No, native Americans were moral inferiors compared to their oppressors. Pajeets are morally inferior AND the oppressors.No group is truly aboriginal or native to a land, it is through being the first known and documented group that is declared as such, and even then land can be "traded" through various ethnicites, usually by colonization and domination, but also by growing the country into an empire, thus expanding it's ethnic reach in name only.
However, the Native Americans were the first group to somehow cross over and discover the two continents. They established a decentralized society through various tribes, with their own separate cultures and their own separate mythologies.
The first European to have seen the Natives as an outsider looking in would've have been either Bjarni Herjólfsson or Leif Erikson.. over a thousand years ago, and close to 500 years before Christopher Columbus, but even then early outsiders had not really disrupted the flow of Native American society on a larger level, only until around the early 1600s.
This might be a retarded thing to say, but being alright with the Anglos and Spaniards taking over the Americas means you should also be alright with Britons & Anglo Saxons being replaced by Pakistanis and other Arabs.
Edit: I wrote this without reading the rest of the thread after that point.
Gaza Stripwhere would the appalachians go?
we are morally superior(torture wasn't a common practice among us unlike europeans)No, native Americans were moral inferiors compared to their oppressors. Pajeets are morally inferior AND the oppressors.
If your people didn't want everything taken from them then they shouldn't have been so submissive and should've put up a real fight. That's how the cookie crumbles after all.No, native Americans were moral inferiors compared to their oppressors. Pajeets are morally inferior AND the oppressors.
Did the settlers introduce natives to the concept of scalping?we are morally superior(torture wasn't a common practice among us unlike europeans)
Subjective morality is not a thing, i was just being smug.If your people didn't want everything taken from them then they shouldn't have been so submissive and should've put up a real fight. That's how the cookie crumbles after all.
View attachment 152418
the oldest record of scalping dated back in scandinavia btwDid the settlers introduce natives to the concept of scalping?
no, but the spanish did introduce genocides, systemic racism, selling people into slavery, etc.Did the Spanish introduce natives to mass human sacrifice?
![]()
I hate vikings for the same reasons I hate Indians GEG, do better. Also,the oldest record of scalping dated back in scandinavia btw
no, but the spanish did introduce genocides, systemic racism, selling people into slavery, etc.
>voluntold vs volunteerI hate vikings for the same reasons I hate Indians GEG, do better. Also,
>forcing someone to pick sugar cane=worse than killing kids for no reason!
OK