/DJT/ - THE DQNALD GENERAL

no, but seriously, someone needs to stop these imports claiming to be "da original nativez n shieeettt"
GhoYzNVWoAAauRK (1).png
 
I never advocated for deporting indians, I said they should require a passport to leave their nation and not be allowed to vote in American politics.
Ah, I thought you were arguing for their deportation.
 
Agreed, the only ones I like are the black Hebrew Israelites because they have the funniest lore
oh definitely, they're dragging us and the hispanics to their bs too. i like seeing their mental gymnastics on how they were the hebrews and such.
 

i mean.. we are literally americans, genetically speaking.

we have been citizens since 1924 and we cannot be denaturalized as we are classified as natural-born citizens.

You shouldn't be.
No group is truly aboriginal or native to a land, it is through being the first known and documented group that is declared as such, and even then land can be "traded" through various ethnicites, usually by colonization and domination, but also by growing the country into an empire, thus expanding it's ethnic reach in name only.

However, the Native Americans were the first group to somehow cross over and discover the two continents. They established a decentralized society through various tribes, with their own separate cultures and their own separate mythologies.
The first European to have seen the Natives as an outsider looking in would've have been either Bjarni Herjólfsson or Leif Erikson.. over a thousand years ago, and close to 500 years before Christopher Columbus, but even then early outsiders had not really disrupted the flow of Native American society on a larger level, only until around the early 1600s.

This might be a retarded thing to say, but being alright with the Anglos and Spaniards taking over the Americas means you should also be alright with Britons & Anglo Saxons being replaced by Pakistanis and other Arabs.

Edit: I wrote this without reading the rest of the thread after that point.
 
No group is truly aboriginal or native to a land, it is through being the first known and documented group that is declared as such, and even then land can be "traded" through various ethnicites, usually by colonization and domination, but also by growing the country into an empire, thus expanding it's ethnic reach in name only.

However, the Native Americans were the first group to somehow cross over and discover the two continents. They established a decentralized society through various tribes, with their own separate cultures and their own separate mythologies.
The first European to have seen the Natives as an outsider looking in would've have been either Bjarni Herjólfsson or Leif Erikson.. over a thousand years ago, and close to 500 years before Christopher Columbus, but even then early outsiders had not really disrupted the flow of Native American society on a larger level, only until around the early 1600s.

This might be a retarded thing to say, but being alright with the Anglos and Spaniards taking over the Americas means you should also be alright with Britons & Anglo Saxons being replaced by Pakistanis and other Arabs.

Edit: I wrote this without reading the rest of the thread after that point.
No, native Americans were moral inferiors compared to their oppressors. Pajeets are morally inferior AND the oppressors.
 
No, native Americans were moral inferiors compared to their oppressors. Pajeets are morally inferior AND the oppressors.
we are morally superior(torture wasn't a common practice among us unlike europeans)
 
No, native Americans were moral inferiors compared to their oppressors. Pajeets are morally inferior AND the oppressors.
If your people didn't want everything taken from them then they shouldn't have been so submissive and should've put up a real fight. That's how the cookie crumbles after all.
1740202011776.png
 
we are morally superior(torture wasn't a common practice among us unlike europeans)
Did the settlers introduce natives to the concept of scalping?🤔 Did the Spanish introduce natives to mass human sacrifice?🤔
 
the oldest record of scalping dated back in scandinavia btw

no, but the spanish did introduce genocides, systemic racism, selling people into slavery, etc.
I hate vikings for the same reasons I hate Indians GEG, do better. Also,
>forcing someone to pick sugar cane=worse than killing kids for no reason!
OK
 
Seeing as it no longer directly pertains to Donald Trump, it'd be best if this conversation regarding the Amerindians continued outside of the President's general thread, for the sake of organization.
 
Back
Top