thread_prefix.27 Ban megathread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why do kikes want to silence him so much? What is he doing that's made them so angry?
 
Well guys it's time to ban HWABAG if wanting to fuck characters who are legal only by the end of the show isn't ok.
 
What did he even say that caused this?

View attachment 120010

If this is the post you're referring to, then the ban is bullshit.

View attachment 120012

DonutHole, right after being unbanned, posted a screencap about how the character was actually 18 now.
Ban worthy or otherwise, it is unbelievably coalish and cringe. In a rare defense for the jannies, bans aren't just determined by the post they are being banned over but past rule breaks and bans. Someone who is a troublemaker or was previously banned may be held to higher standards. At least that would be a fair mindset.
 
Ban worthy or otherwise, it is unbelievably coalish and cringe. In a rare defense for the jannies, bans aren't just determined by the post they are being banned over but past rule breaks and bans. Someone who is a troublemaker or was previously banned may be held to higher standards. At least that would be a fair mindset.
Insufferable gooner spic, keep him banned.
 
yeah tomoko is 18 at the end of the show from what i read on the wiki
Exactly this. Right after he got unbanned, DonutHole posted a screenshot of that wiki page about how Tomoko is actually 18. He did not say anything about how being attracted to a 15-year-old is okay. He called his ban bullshit and posted a screencap about how the character he got banned for calling his wife was actually 18 (he posted that on his profile page, so I can't access it, but I'm sure that @baqqrih can).

Ban worthy or otherwise, it is unbelievably coalish and cringe. In a rare defense for the jannies, bans aren't just determined by the post they are being banned over but past rule breaks and bans. Someone who is a troublemaker or was previously banned may be held to higher standards. At least that would be a fair mindset.
Being "coalish and cringe" isn't justification for a ban and it certainly isn't justification for a permaban. The posts that he made after his most recent banning were not rule-breaking and, as such, he should not have been banned.
 
>donuthole gets unbanned
>knows he's on thin fucking ice
>in the same amount of time it took for the titanic to go from hitting the iceberg to being at the bottom of the Atlantic he gets banned again, permanently

 
the irony excuse won’t save you anymoar
The whole irony thing can't even be applied to Donuthole's perma, he was saying his ban was nonesense, not being ironic. And it won't save me if I make a joke, I can logically prove the rule's complete cow dung all I want.
 
The whole irony thing can't even be applied to Donuthole's perma, he was saying his ban was nonesense, not being ironic. And it won't save me if I make a joke, I can logically prove the rule's complete cow dung all I want.
i never said it applied to his ban albeit i was just talking about you
 
i never said it applied to his ban albeit i was just talking about you
You can have my guarantee that I'll pretend that saying I'm a jartycuck who goons to 'p is actually not being a decent fucking human being and not a keanu reeves wholesome chungus moment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top