Texas made lolicon a felony

Lolicon, while vile and repulsive, is not a matter for law enforcement since it does not involve harm to actual children, and criminalizing any cartoons - regardless of what they depict - sets an extremely dangerous precedent with massive potential for abuse. If you're criminalizing cartoon depictions of sexual situations involving children, then you're potentially opening up the door for certain episodes of South Park to be criminalized. On top of that, there is absolutely no way to objectively measure the age of a cartoon character. Not to mention, the US Supreme Court has already ruled on this, and Texas's bill will inevitably be struck down as unconstitutional: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/law-jan-june02-scotus_04-16

Photorealistic AI-generated imagery is a much more complicated matter, however. As far as the law is concerned, it should definitely depend on what the AI model is using. If it's using real-life children as the template, then that's not the same as if it's using completely fake imagery with entirely fictional, nonexistent children. The latter is still absolutely disgusting, of course, but it doesn't involve real harm to real children. Using real children as a template for fake CP, however, does obviously harm real children. I definitely should have gone into more detail about what the AI is trained on in the article.
of course the kike is a pedophilia defender... not surprsprising as kikes are hereditary pedophiles
 
What other states haven't done this yet? Make them enact this law right now or blow them skyhigh.
evilgigachad.jpg
 
Fucking aryan
just report baraag to dreamhost for them to shut down and cut ties to
many many more pedo sites like attentionwhores need so
 
And then what? SmallAnus is the moral arbiter and the judge and jury? I at least want to know which rules/laws we should follow.
I don't think linking an offsite CP article is really up for moral debate. And I really thought society as a whole knew that throwing CP links online around willy nilly is what we call "disgusting and illegal".
 
And then what? SmallAnus is the moral arbiter and the judge and jury? I at least want to know which rules/laws we should follow.
Shlog law ≠ US law, you can be banned for saying things that you wouldn't get arrested for. I suggested you don't debate it further.
 
I don't think linking an offsite CP article is really up for moral debate. And I really thought society as a whole knew that throwing CP links online around willy nilly is what we call "disgusting and illegal".
It's on wikipedia and not 'p in accordance with US law, where as far as I know this website is registred. That's not even the issue, because no one is arguing that the image halal or should've been linked to int he first place.
 
Japan didnt have CP laws until 2014 btw
false, it was already made illegal in the 90s, the 2014 law just made it stricter. I do agree that we need to be cracking down harder on degeneracy, however. Why didn't muttmericans make any laws about it while they occupied us anyway, they basically made all the laws.
 
The album cover is a naked 11 year old girl doing some suggestive post that the US government deemed not illegal due to "artistic" reasons so it's allowed on Wikipedia on the literal infobox of the album cover, even when the album cover was changed due to massive backlash
no yeah i know that i was margeing at the signature thing
 
The album cover is a naked 11 year old girl doing some suggestive post that the US government deemed not illegal due to "artistic" reasons so it's allowed on Wikipedia on the literal infobox of the album cover, even when the album cover was changed due to massive backlash
can you ban the kike moonmetropolis as well xe was defending ai 'p and drawn 'p
 
false, it was already made illegal in the 90s, the 2014 law just made it stricter. I do agree that we need to be cracking down harder on degeneracy, however. Why didn't muttmericans make any laws about it while they occupied us anyway, they basically made all the laws.
It was banned in 1999, that's pretty recent. It's not our job to make sure Japs don't molest children.
 
It was banned in 1999, that's pretty recent. It's not our job to make sure Japs don't molest children.
we are one of the safest nations for children, our child rape/sexual assault rates are way lower than the western nations (including crime empire muttmerica), let alone the rest of the world. If you are wasting time criticizing us for an issue we already solved, why don't you explain why child marriages are legal in your nation? who are the real pedophiles?
 
we are one of the safest nations for children, our child rape/sexual assault rates are way lower than the western nations (including crime empire muttmerica), let alone the rest of the world. If you are wasting time criticizing us for an issue we already solved, why don't you explain why child marriages are legal in your nation? who are the real pedophiles?
The vast majority of sexual abuse cases in Japan aren't reported and if they are, they perpetrators are often acquitted. There's a reason all phones in Japan are required a camera shutter sound. Inbred RethugliKKKan states are extensions of the third-world and barely count as the US, it's not our fault they legalized child marriage.
 
And nobody should be arguing that it's fine because it's heckin' legal. It should've just been the end of the story, as it was literally a 11 year old girl doing a sexual pose while completely nude. There are some things you should never defend and this is one of them. Had it been some other rule (except rule 1) I wouldn't really care, but this is rule 2. I don't know why he constantly brought it up and as a result of him bringing it up randomly in the hole yet again, he got btfo'd by Broot
Who argued that it's fine, can you point to literally anyone doing so?
Why would he constantly bring up that it was heckin' legal when we unanimously agreed it's child porn. The discussion was closed when we changed Ytsuken's ban to a permaban. It's 'P. It's against rule 2
Because, US law, as it stands right now disagrees with you. You could've literally just said, Ytsuken posted a nude image in a server with children, and if U:R was doing the "uhh, akshually" then, yeah I'd agree with you, he's the scum of the earth. Everyone here is autistic to some degree and for some people law and rules are important, idk. talk to him, if he thinks the album cover is bueno, fuck him also.
Okay so let's say in a universe where everyone decided Chudborean was right, we would have the album cover as a signature and there would be nothing we can do about it because... IT'S LEGAL!! If you think that's shit, then I think it's reasonable to realize shutting up and conceding is the right thing to do, which Chudborean didn't do.
I have never said this. I literally argued a technicality. From the first post I made I called Ytsuked retarded for posting nudity in a forum WITH FUCKING CHILDREN IN IT.
 
The vast majority of sexual abuse cases in Japan aren't reported and if they are, they perpetrators are often acquitted. There's a reason all phones in Japan are required a camera shutter sound. Inbred RethugliKKKan states are extensions of the third-world and barely count as the US, it's not our fault they legalized child marriage.
>oh actually crime is really bad there its just not reported because... it just isn't ok????
thanks for just blatantly making up garbage that can't be corroborated in any way. really shows how flimsy and weak your evidence is.
>it's not our fault they legalized child marriage
>we can't control people legalizing child marriage and being pedophiles

really proving that muttmericans are the real pedophiles. pathetic
 
Back
Top