Texas made lolicon a felony

[Xiuhcoyotl]

WHY TF IS TS LIKE 8 PAGES?!??

this is a good thing...

end of discussion.

 

[WeegeeWarrior]

 

[meijak]

Soyjak.blog is a private entity, not government entity. US laws do not dictate what we can allow. US government currently allows lolicon but everyone calls it 'P, because legality does not dictate literal definitions and etymology. The government can't tell me 2+2=5. The government can't force me to keep pedophiles on this platform

Who is forcing you? No one is arguing for 'p to be posted or even kept on the platform. Nor any explicit images for that matter.

Because I see it for what it is. I am not going to use lawyer speak just to appease some contrarian retard who spends his life talking about how Froot is ruining the Sharty for the 1058th time in the Kiwifarms Sharty thread. If the government started enforcing trannies' pronouns, does that truly make troonella, a she?

It's not me being some moral arbiter because others agreed with what my eyes saw, so it's not me being schizophrenic or some shit. My brain faculties are clearly working properly

Then just say so, instead of calling upon some arcane laws that don't exist. It's Broots forum, his rules.

Let's just agree to disagree. If you were in my shoes you would understand

Let's agree to disagree. Ban people for rule violations. You don't need to lob pedo accusations at people because they think that US website should adhere to the US law, however flawed that is. Like you can talk to U:R. Afaik he was thrown in the hole with no explanation of what he did to deserve it.

 

[Soynic Hedgehog]

WHY TF IS TS LIKE 8 PAGES?!??

this is a good thing...

end of discussion.

niggers

 

[Sloppyjakky]

>saar texuis is raycis saar me can no more goon 2 'p o algo texis is raysic

 

[meijak]

lock this thread this is bad look for schlogcacas...

No.

 

[KingCargo]

Nine pages of bickering over something worth praise, get a grip.

 

[Soynic Hedgehog]

lock this thread this is bad look for schlogcacas...

stfu jimbo

 

[8doe]

Biggest win ever

 

[_account]

Nine pages of bickering over something worth praise, get a grip.

Let's remember this thread and who supported it and who was against it

 

[8doe]

Who is forcing you? No one is arguing for 'p to be posted or even kept on the platform. Nor any explicit images for that matter.


Then just say so, instead of calling upon some arcane laws that don't exist. It's Broots forum, his rules.

Let's agree to disagree. Ban people for rule violations. You don't need to lob pedo accusations at people because they think that US website should adhere to the US law, however flawed that is. Like you can talk to U:R. Afaik he was thrown in the hole with no explanation of what he did to deserve it.

this is not something to be defending its child porn

Lolicon, while vile and repulsive, is not a matter for law enforcement since it does not involve harm to actual children, and criminalizing any cartoons - regardless of what they depict - sets an extremely dangerous precedent with massive potential for abuse. If you're criminalizing cartoon depictions of sexual situations involving children, then you're potentially opening up the door for certain episodes of South Park to be criminalized. On top of that, there is absolutely no way to objectively measure the age of a cartoon character. Not to mention, the US Supreme Court has already ruled on this, and Texas's bill will inevitably be struck down as unconstitutional: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/law-jan-june02-scotus_04-16

Photorealistic AI-generated imagery is a much more complicated matter, however. As far as the law is concerned, it should definitely depend on what the AI model is using. If it's using real-life children as the template, then that's not the same as if it's using completely fake imagery with entirely fictional, nonexistent children. The latter is still absolutely disgusting, of course, but it doesn't involve real harm to real children. Using real children as a template for fake CP, however, does obviously harm real children. I definitely should have gone into more detail about what the AI is trained on in the article.

man i thought you were better than this josh

 

[_account]

this is not something to be defending its child porn

man i thought you were better than this josh

He isn't.

 

[NigKiller_Tojo]

lock this thread this is bad look for schlogcacas...

it's a jew and a weeb defending drawn 'p, not surprising at all

 

[KingCargo]

Lolicon, while vile and repulsive, is not a matter for law enforcement since it does not involve harm to actual children, and criminalizing any cartoons - regardless of what they depict - sets an extremely dangerous precedent with massive potential for abuse. If you're criminalizing cartoon depictions of sexual situations involving children, then you're potentially opening up the door for certain episodes of South Park to be criminalized. On top of that, there is absolutely no way to objectively measure the age of a cartoon character. Not to mention, the US Supreme Court has already ruled on this, and Texas's bill will inevitably be struck down as unconstitutional: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/law-jan-june02-scotus_04-16

Photorealistic AI-generated imagery is a much more complicated matter, however. As far as the law is concerned, it should definitely depend on what the AI model is using. If it's using real-life children as the template, then that's not the same as if it's using completely fake imagery with entirely fictional, nonexistent children. The latter is still absolutely disgusting, of course, but it doesn't involve real harm to real children. Using real children as a template for fake CP, however, does obviously harm real children. I definitely should have gone into more detail about what the AI is trained on in the article.

Sick repulsive glowing kike freak. No wonder there's bickering with your kind around.

 

[NigKiller_Tojo]

this is not something to be defending its child porn

man i thought you were better than this josh

why would you ever trust a kike to do anything right? they are demons built off of pure evil

 

[meijak]

Nobody, because they're banned.

I never did. I don't know what the fuck you're referring to so I'm assuming it was because I called it 'P. It's literally 'P by definition. The only thing the US of A enforces is CSAM which they said it isn't. If you're forced to never call that shit 'P then lolicon wouldn't be 'P EV&OE IT IS. This is what I mean by 2+2=5 because by the very definition of the two words, child (anything to do with kids), and porn (anything pornographic (Containing an explicit depiction of sexual activity or Depicting something in detail, usually unnecessarily)), is what these shit is. Prohibiting me from labeling something as such even though it literally makes sense, is literally newspeak and distorting reality

I literally don't know what arcane law you speak of that I tried to invoke. Maybe it's rule 2, something literally arcane to Chudborean and Ytsuken I guess

Don't argue with me about this, argue this with the supreme court of US of A, I've told you idk how many times that I think that the image is obscene and should be considered 'p and purged from internet. I am arguing a technicality as was U:R.

this is not something to be defending its child porn

Where was I defending CP? Bruh.

 

[KingCargo]

>Bruh.

 

[8doe]

why would you ever trust a kike to do anything right? they are demons built off of pure evil

thought he'd have at least a little common sense. @MoonMetropolis seriously man i thought you hated pedophiles why do you enable this kind of stuff under the premise of "it doesn't hurt anyone"

 

[8doe]

God I'm not even mad this is just disappointing some of you niggas are so fucking dumb stop using US law to determine your morals
zoophile porn is legal in almost all 50 states. is zoophile porn cool now? that's fine? some of you have no real moral compass and it shows

 

[NigKiller_Tojo]

thought he'd have at least a little common sense. @MoonMetropolis seriously man i thought you hated pedophiles why do you enable this kind of stuff under the premise of "it doesn't hurt anyone"

it's a fucking kike. they're all morally deficient and evil. the fat criminal kike is particularly bad, not only is xe a total retard that makes bomb threats for no reason and goes to jail for it, xe incessantly defends degenerate jew garbage like faggotry, trannies, and 'p on this site.