X migrant ack xer account

[X Immigrant]

BTW 2/3 of the mods didn't want her banned so it's not like I'm alone here

 

[Fagon]

it's such a retarded drama too. why even contest this? better this happened sooner than later

not a 'teen or a chuds.life migrant either, literally just some random chick posting here for some reason.

 

[Fagon]

BTW 2/3 of the mods didn't want her banned so it's not like I'm alone here

jannies are trannies who cares

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

especially the fact she isn't even a soyteen. she doesn't even have the right to use the site for that reason alone

all of us weren't soyteens at one point

 

[X Immigrant]

schlog is a privilege, not a right

Which we take away if they break the rules. The appeal made it so that she didn't.

 

[Dremora]

other than oot, who?

Baqqrih.

 

[Oot]

this is the longest and most drawn out drama this site has had by far, and it's over some random mudslime who defended child marriage by bringing up the "age of mind" being banned, despite the fact that 80% of the site either does not care at all if she's banned, or actively want her to be banned.

This isn't about the 'parkles, it's about the precedent it sets for the future. We don't want users to get banned just because Froot's clitty was leaky that day. I support X Immigrant here.

 

[istanbul]

BTW 2/3 of the mods didn't want her banned so it's not like I'm alone here

it's broots problem if he puts gullible high schoolers as moderators on his site

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

Baqqrih.

baqqrih is neutral doe

 

[X Immigrant]

This isn't about the 'parkles, it's about the precedent it sets for the future. We don't want users to get banned just because Froot's clitty was leaky that day. I support X Immigrant here.

Yeah there's also that too

baqqrih is neutral doe

He voted 'no' in janny chat

 

[Fagon]

We don't want users to get banned just because Froot's clitty was leaky that day

lol

 

[X Immigrant]

View attachment 33121
lol

When it turns out his bans are warranted it's entirely ok.

Not to mention we banned this user before.

Even though Froot said he banned her specifically because of the rule 3 shit. The parkles ban was justified

You're going to take his word at face value? And no it wasn't.

 

[X Immigrant]

No he was altfagging to an extreme as well.

 

[istanbul]

all of us weren't soyteens at one point

if you aren't at this point maybe you shouldn't be using the site

 

[Oot]

View attachment 33121
lol

He made like 9,999 Alts and continued to talk to himself on them despite many warnings

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

if you aren't at this point maybe you shouldn't be using the site

my nig, i've been in the soisphere far longer than most of yall niggas

 

[X Immigrant]

Anyways this drama is gay and if one of the mods could direct me to Broot's email, I think it's Brootforce or some shit, that would be great.

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

reading is tough, isn't it

yes, i'm busy i'll get back to u later

 

[X Immigrant]

@R/196 Mod since you're gonna keep defending parkles, please clarify why it's unjustified to ban her despite saying what she said without invoking the "its her religion" card.

Because the Bible has things like this as well. It's not a bannable offense to have a religion.

 

[istanbul]

my nig, i've been in the soisphere far longer than most of yall niggas

I wasn't accusing you of anything, Pablo. Work on your reading comprehension, vato.