Discussion Why are turkish bulls so aryan and why do they have the clearest claim to the legacy of Rome?

DonutHole

Grand Sage of Pork [#107C10] LOVER
Compare the greek shitskin pretender:
greece-portrait-of-a-greek-man-AR1PAY-3236810805.jpg


To the radiance of this Turkish AVGVSTVS:
1649583701599ac947ba62feae830bc5-2480995171.jpg
 
I wouldn't be claiming the first globohomo
View attachment 35508
Not that I hate 'toss or anything but he definitely missed big time here. Calling Rome "globalist" is like calling any imperialist empire globalist, which is retarded. So many empires throughout history tried conquering the world and all failed. I'm sure nobody here would even think about calling the third reich "globohomo" in fear that hitler's ghost will rape you at 3 am, but is it really that much different than rome conquering europe? The only difference between the two in this case is that one lasted almost 2000 years and the other lasted 12 years.
 
Not that I hate 'toss or anything but he definitely missed big time here. Calling Rome "globalist" is like calling any imperialist empire globalist, which is retarded. So many empires throughout history tried conquering the world and all failed. I'm sure nobody here would even think about calling the third reich "globohomo" in fear that hitler's ghost will rape you at 3 am, but is it really that much different than rome conquering europe? The only difference between the two in this case is that one lasted almost 2000 years and the other lasted 12 years.
Almost all empires were/are globohomo.
 
Not that I hate 'toss or anything but he definitely missed big time here. Calling Rome "globalist" is like calling any imperialist empire globalist, which is retarded. So many empires throughout history tried conquering the world and all failed. I'm sure nobody here would even think about calling the third reich "globohomo" in fear that hitler's ghost will rape you at 3 am, but is it really that much different than rome conquering europe? The only difference between the two in this case is that one lasted almost 2000 years and the other lasted 12 years.
All global hegemons were globalist, especially Rome. The example of the Third Reich is actually a good one, because they, despite intense post-war propaganda from the Allies, really wanted to become a globalist empire. The Reich quickly went from the idea “Germany has been mistreated by everyone and must take revenge” to “We bring peace and freedom to the all races occupied by Jews and Freemasons”.
 
i don't think there's any country that could legitimately be called the "third rome," byzantium was only the "second rome" by virtue of being a direct successor state to the original, united imperivm romanvm (i.e. the "first rome")
 
TRVKE everybody ignored, America is Rome in every way but the name
other suggestions like Turkey or Russia are just geg
 
Back
Top