Where do you guys draw the line between a more than typical edgy teen and a foodist

The moment they start to hurt my feelings.
Straight to the prison you go bigot!
giga176.jpeg
 
The line:
TND------------hate speech-----------'eens-------------|--------niggerinferno dust----------foodists------gore-----'p-----satancacas.
 
Pedophilia, 'p and animal gore. Child gore to some extent. I don't think gore itself is foodist. I think you can be moral while being associated with gore as long as it's not for sadism. Medical gore also counts and is significantly less immoral (but also gives similar shock) to gore of people getting killed. But maybe it's cause I got baited too much with gore and shock sites when I was younger, so the line is a little thin.
 
Pedophilia, 'p and animal gore. Child gore to some extent. I don't think gore itself is foodist. I think you can be moral while being associated with gore as long as it's not for sadism. Medical gore also counts and is significantly less immoral (but also gives similar shock) to gore of people getting killed. But maybe it's cause I got baited too much with gore and shock sites when I was younger, so the line is a little thin.
How is animal gore worse than human gore? :kek:
 
How is animal gore worse than human gore? :kek:
Usually comes with sadism, same kind that comes with child sadism. Human gore can come from different circumstances (killings, accidents, anatomical complications, self inflicted) but the usual demographic for animal gore is people who are into it, which is why a lot of it is considered illegal under US law.
Part of what attracts foodists is what is illegal, and it's proven that with a lot of people shock content regarding harm inflicted in animals can be more shocking than with humans, which is why foodists use it.
 
Back
Top