thread_prefix.19 What Do You Think About The Patriarchy Theory?

Soyteen Liker

Soyteen Liker

Well-Rounded 'Liker
🏅
Joined
Mar 6, 2024
Messages
4,092
The patriarchy is generally defined as a society in which men hold most of the power. I think this makes sense, it's not like you see most people who have led or are leading history be women. It is related to feminists but it can get pretty bitter with some of them being misandrist and saying things like "Men live life on easy mode/have no real problems." There's also the inverse, that the people with the least power tend to be men. If you've seen the r/mensrights infographics, you know what I mean. They're more likely to die by suicide, be homeless, face more workplace injuries, et.c. Now I'll start with some leading questions.
  • Is the patriarchy a useful/valid construct to view the world in? Do we live in a patriarchy?
  • If so, is it a good/bad/neutral thing?
  • If so, should it be changed to something else?
  • If you want to change it to something else, what would you change it to?
Please remember to keep calm and not be sexist, people do not like it when you dislike half the population [wholesome]
 
nigger
1740630051565.png
 
I'd say that we still live in a patriarchal society, but in one that's also actively crumbling from a continued loss of its patriarchal traditions over the past century, and, while it's rather obvious, I also believe this crumbling to be a part of the larger degeneration of tradition that is leading us to the current social sufferings of the modern world. Patriarchy has been the natural order of all civilizations that have ever prospered in all of history, simply put. As far as I can tell, one will notice in trying to research historical "matriarchal societies" that the ones holding such traits of this concept have been obscure, uncivilized, dirty backwaters in places like India or West Africa. Thus, just by this observation of history (yet there are plenty more alongside it to also express the necessity of patriarchy), we can understand the foolishness of trying to destruct the rule of men in one's own society in favor of women, who are unfit for such responsibilities of societal leadership (as Saint Paul says when speaking of church leadership, "I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet"), or the effective deceit in trying to subvert patriarchy when attempting to destroy a civilization.
 
Soyteen Liker said:
Why have you mentioned this three times already to me? I think my parents would get in the way like they always do but it's a touchy subject so I'd prefer you not to derail my thread.
Click to expand...
It'll solve all your problems and you get to travel the world.
 
Soyteen Liker said:
Why have you mentioned this three times already to me? I think my parents would get in the way like they always do but it's a touchy subject so I'd prefer you not to derail my thread.
Click to expand...
he wants you dead lol i also don’t think you’re physically or mentally fit so it’s kind of an insult aswell
 
Soyteen Liker said:
The patriarchy is generally defined as a society in which men hold most of the power. I think this makes sense, it's not like you see most people who have led or are leading history be women. It is related to feminists but it can get pretty bitter with some of them being misandrist and saying things like "Men live life on easy mode/have no real problems." There's also the inverse, that the people with the least power tend to be men. If you've seen the r/mensrights infographics, you know what I mean. They're more likely to die by suicide, be homeless, face more workplace injuries, et.c. Now I'll start with some leading questions.
  • Is the patriarchy a useful/valid construct to view the world in? Do we live in a patriarchy?
  • If so, is it a good/bad/neutral thing?
  • If so, should it be changed to something else?
  • If you want to change it to something else, what would you change it to?
Please remember to keep calm and not be sexist, people do not like it when you dislike half the population [wholesome]
Click to expand...
There's a reason why women are "motherly". They are the ones who nurture and act on a more personal level. The men provide and are expected to act distant while also non-emotional.
I think this is why men are put into positions of leadership, it's because of the way society builds them up to be a certain way that isn't the same for women. I don't think it's impossible for a woman to be a leader though, and periods have no relevance to xir's decision making. I think it's just the way men are set up compared to women, that a man is given more preparation.
Men and women are opposites meant to complete each other.
This is also why transgenderism is bullshit; a man cannot fufill the role of a woman, as a woman cannot fulfill the role of a man. This is also why flaming homosexuals and masculine dykes are considered repulsive.

1. It is to some degree. If it's worked for so long I don't see the problem in trying to break what isn't broken, though I can understand that the past limited women a lot more than it does now, regardless of the advent of civil rights, I do think it works as long as the man has proven himself competent and capable.
In the only case of discrimination, I personally believe that men should be in leadership positions during wartime because men are physicially stronger than women. Unfortunately a lot of men today are weaker willed so it isn't as benefical for a man to be a leader as it used to be. So in today's world it doesn't matter as much if it's a man or a woman who receives a leadership position, a politician is a politician.
Also yes, we do live in a patriarchy.

2. It has it's merits. Can be a good thing but can also be a bad thing. It's highest highs are during wartime.
 
If you ask me what patriarchy looks like ill tell you just look at any islamic country in the middle east or Afghanistan.
 
FartmingerFuckwadCheeseSte said:
>This is also why transgenderism is bullshit; a man cannot fufill the role of a woman, as a woman cannot fulfill the role of a man. This is also why flaming homosexuals and masculine dykes are considered repulsive.
Click to expand...
What about harry sisson and tim walz, they’re like women except they are biologically male
 

Not reading, women are retarded consumers who contribute zilch, swastika in the thread, 14/88, you sound like a seething kike, Trvmp is MEIN FUHRER. PLQN STQTVS: TRVSTED.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top