VOTE! The REAL Thrembo....

[dino]

theres no point in debating warrior 'p, hes a braindead shitskin moron, stop wasting your time and go do something fun

 

[Warrior-Z]

Dawg how am i supposed to "debate" someone who just spams word salads in the thread

You can go ahead and prove how it’s a word salad when it coherently makes points kek.

marge, are you talking to yourself rn

No, I’m definitely talking to you

 

[ThremboSchlog]

It's a fake warning so you have no warning points
View attachment 172747
This is what Gemerald's profile looks like to me
View attachment 172748

Ok......but I don't think your involvement and schemery ITT was needed methinks, janny.

 

[Gemerald]

Why does this shitskin keep trying to talk to me when no one can understand what he's saying?

 

[Warrior-Z]

theres no point in debating warrior 'p, hes a braindead shitskin moron, stop wasting your time and go do something fun

You can say I’m brain-dead, even though none of these people in this thread have ever won a single conversation against me. You can sit there and be racist and Islamophobic all you want, that just gives me the moral authority and any debater who would read the thread would know that I won.

I dare a single person to come step in VC and have the debate uploaded on YouTube and let’s see what people say.

 

[Meursault]

0/0. You've never been given a warning before

what about me?

 

[evandoe]

 

[Warrior-Z]

Why does this shitskin keep trying to talk to me when no one can understand what he's saying?

Nice concession, I win. You halted the dialectic kek. @ThremboSchlog can understand me.

 

[ribbon]

You niggas are still fighting

 

[Warrior-Z]

You niggas are still fighting

Yes and I am winning since I can give anyone I want LLLLZZZZ.

 

[meijak]

what about me?

You have 1. I am warning you RN.

 

[Gigafly]

Although I still posted multiple arguments and multiple quotes so that does not disapprove what I said whatsoever.

You only posted one as apart of the same article, which says that it isn't indisputable.

No, it’s not proof because I’m already refusing what you’re saying.

>It's not proof because I said so
It boggles my mind on how you're THIS retarded

You can go ahead and prove that. That he himself stated it.

It's literally in the Sahih Al-Bukhari. Even Aisha herself multiple times narrated that Muhammad said that picture-makers would be punished on the Day of Resurrection.

I purchased a cushion with pictures on it. The Prophet (came and) stood at the door but did not enter. I said (to him), "I repent to Allah for what (the guilt) I have done." He said, "What is this cushion?" I said, "It is for you to sit on and recline on." He said, "The makers of these pictures will be punished on the Day of Resurrection and it will be said to them, 'Make alive what you have created.' Moreover, the angels do not enter a house where there are pictures.'"

Sahih al-Bukhari 5957
Book 77, Hadith 173

 

[Meursault]

You have 1. I am warning you RN.

for what doe? I haven't done anything wrong...yet.

 

[chudnater2]

margerald

 

[evandoe]

...ø·ø ̈ùšù„ø© ... ø£øoù†ùšø© ù„ù„ø£ø·ù ø§ù„ ... ù„ùšø ̈ùšø§

 

[meijak]

for what doe? I haven't done anything wrong...yet.

Idk actually, i thought it'd be funny.

 

[dino]

You can say I’m brain-dead,

brainwashed too

even though none of these people in this thread have ever won a single conversation against me.

they have

You can sit there and be racist and Islamophobic all you want, that just gives me the moral authority and any debater who would read the thread would know that I won.

>you were hecking mean to me therefore i es winner

 

[meijak]

are you esl? You start "debates" in random threads andderail them then leak all over the place until the thread gets sent to /dump/ I'm telling you to make a megathread maybe in /incel/ so you stop shitting up threads

This is true. Also baiting is irresistible because that fucking retard will always reply.

 

[Warrior-Z]

You only posted one as apart of the same article, which says that it isn't indisputable.

>It's not proof because I said so
It boggles my mind on how you're THIS retarded

It's literally in the Sahih Al-Bukhari. Even Aisha herself multiple times narrated that Muhammad said that picture-makers would be punished on the Day of Resurrection.



Sahih al-Bukhari 5957
Book 77, Hadith 173

Your take on this hadith is cherry-picked, you dumbass. Sure, Sahih al-Bukhari mentions a punishment for picture makers, but don't delude yourself into thinking that wide range of scholars from Malikis to Salafis to Hanbalis like Ibn Hamdan haven't long argued that the hadith is prohibiting only a full statue casting a shadow, not any image. It is the circumstance and intention that matters, as long as the art does not stray into being idolatrous, is not immoral, or obsessive, it can be okay. Also, I never said, "it's no proof because I said so", I said that I refuted what you have used as evidence so you have no proof now kek.

 

[Warrior-Z]

brainwashed too

Justify that.

they have

Justify that.

>you were hecking mean to me therefore i es winner

Strawman fallacy.