The decline of democracy

El_Martiniano

Nusoicaca
Is democracy facing a decline?
Democracy has been criticised for many years, for example, Plato's philosophy which harshly criticises democracy, but nowadays, we can see that it simply does not work any more, the new generations are becoming more and more radical and anti-democratic, to this we must add the fact that, if a young person is not an ideological fanatic, they are apolitical and would not mind voting, they do not know the weight and importance of a vote.
There was once a survey on cognitive problems in adults and my country Chile was the one with the most problems, meaning that a large part of the population finds it difficult to do things simply because they don't know how, what I am getting at is that a large adult population is susceptible to being fooled by politicians and voting for the wrong thing. But this is when I ask you, do you think that democracy is in decline?
EL1ClxcWoAEFYYY.jpg
 
It's because the supposed democracies are controlled by something larger.

It was actually a problem of the monarchies that spread over. The Rothschilds were able to take over Britain in the Napoleonic wars. The disease spread to Europe immediately after, and then to America around a century later.

America's disease spread to all the new democracies it started up. It was over before it even started.
 
Democracy is a flawed system. Letting the people choose is a horrible idea, the masses do not know whats best. Just look at braplifornia.
 
Democracy is a flawed system. Letting the people choose is a horrible idea, the masses do not know whats best. Just look at braplifornia.
I think Democracy is good and we should vote on every issue no matter how minute, including the sentencing of criminals.
We have that already actually, it is called a Jury.
 
I think Democracy is good and we should vote on every issue no matter how minute, including the sentencing of criminals.
We have that already actually, it is called a Jury.
a jury depends on a group of people
say if majority of the people in an area are uberchuds or ubertrannies
its going to be obvious what the result is
and even if it is centrist look a country's cultures and values and you'll know what you are most likely gonna get
People are manipulated by bias and societies, letting them run themselves would only amplify them, turning everywhere into caliniggerhellia.
 
America's disease spread to all the new democracies it started up. It was over before it even started.
Makes a lot of sense actually. Democracy as it was started in Turkey wasn't caused by some foreign power so it was less cucked than other places. I still think democracy is le bad at the end of the day but I am obviously able to see the nuance here, the difference between a kike controlled democracy and a democracy controlled by the people who actually live in that country.
 
I mean to be honest ofcourse the jannies and admins think democracy is bad you fucking dictator powercucks.
But in my opinion, the opinion of the people, not just a biased group of people, but people from all walks of life matters a lot. It's like asking for feedback on a project you're working on, you have to consider the opinions of others if you want improvement.
say if majority of the people in an area are uberchuds or ubertrannies
If the group is biased, debias it. A jury is picked usually out of random people so this issue will not occur.
 
Democracy is good but only smart people should vote. But you can't tell if someone is smart so you just gotta hope smart people outnumber dumb people
 
Democracy is good but only smart people should vote. But you can't tell if someone is smart so you just gotta hope smart people outnumber dumb people
Everyone is a retard by necessity. No one smart seriously engages with politics because they understand how pointless it is. Politics and everything it entails is too complex for anyone to casually grasp them fully, meaning anyone engaging with politics as a hobby is inevitably going to be wrong on everything and arrive at his political stances by what seems most appealing to him rather than by analyzing the full picture, because you can never truly analyze the whole picture. That's why we need people who's JOB it is to understand politics, economy, social issues, diplomacy etc. Get a child, teach him since age 4 how to rule a country, give him a competent circle of advisors and that's how you can get someone competent enough to understand what's going on, who also has enough direct power to accomplish and commit to an agenda.
 
Everyone is a retard by necessity. No one smart seriously engages with politics because they understand how pointless it is. Politics and everything it entails is too complex for anyone to casually grasp them fully, meaning anyone engaging with politics as a hobby is inevitably going to be wrong on everything and arrive at his political stances by what seems most appealing to him rather than by analyzing the full picture, because you can never truly analyze the whole picture. That's why we need people who's JOB it is to understand politics, economy, social issues, diplomacy etc. Get a child, teach him since age 4 how to rule a country, give him a competent circle of advisors and that's how you can get someone competent enough to understand what's going on, who also has enough direct power to accomplish and commit to an agenda.
Why don't you just remove the child and keep the advisors then
 
If the group is biased, debias it. A jury is picked usually out of random people so this issue will not occur.
>remove bias by... well you just do
Picking random people from an area does not change this. Societal values shape bias. Imagine if this was 1940's ameriKKKa, take an average city it would be full of heckin bigoted chuds, with a minority of niggers. They wouldve lynched some poor nigger child, cut xher balls off, and throw xher into a river all for looking at some cracker foid wrong. Now look at 2024, with most cities full of the average person being a libtranny. They wouldve let george floyd go even if xhe went to some cathcuck school, shot up 6 gorillion kids, and died a trans hero.
 
Get a child, teach him since age 4 how to rule a country, give him a competent circle of advisors and that's how you can get someone competent enough to understand what's going on, who also has enough direct power to accomplish and commit to an agenda.
Definitely not a system of governance that has been practiced by every culture and people for millennia
 

Similar threads

Back
Top