:sick:(pretend this is a glowie emoji)Done a bit of research, seems xenforo implemented a statistics feature for admins to check on their sites.
Idk if that's possible but could it be like seen by everyone ? I'd like to check on them
u got broot working like a DAWG poor thing:sick:(pretend this is a glowie emoji)
BROOOT ADDD A GLOWIE EMOJI AND GLOWWW TEXXT
glow text doesn't seem feasible, like spintext:sick:(pretend this is a glowie emoji)
BROOOT ADDD A GLOWIE EMOJI AND GLOWWW TEXXT
I think it might be but you need to have an add-on installed.Done a bit of research, seems xenforo implemented a statistics feature for admins to check on their sites.
Idk if that's possible but could it be like seen by everyone ? I'd like to check on them
Would be great, I feel like the site is growing more and more rapidly, but I have no actual way of tellingI think it might be but you need to have an add-on installed.
Yeah, admin needs to install them.are add ons something the admin install on the site or is it a third party type of thing
ev&oe we already had updoots and downdoots (like and dislike reacts)
yeah but this is just uglyev&oe we already had updoots and downdoots (like and dislike reacts)
I don't like these "upvotes", either. The current reactions have soul, they have character, and they actually convey complex emotion, even when the reaction is the simple "like button" itself. When I directly, plainly enjoy a post, I give it a joyous white thumb surrounded with a circle of blue. When you see that symbol, you feel agreed with. Someone has acknowledged your post, and they liked it, in the literal sense of bestowing upon it that reaction, and in the other sense, as they found some proper thought from your post, and they liked, or enjoyed, it. When you see these Reddit updoots, they have no connection to the human figure. Not one of the appendages that emerge from my hand form an upward or downward-facing chevron. My thumb does emerge from my hand, and with its rotation alone can it convey more emotion than these arrows while already fulfilling their purpose. When I laugh, my mouth does not turn into an upward-facing chevron. The "GEG!" reaction already conveys this feeling of laughter instead. When I'm pained by what I've just read, I similarly do not turn my mouth into a perfectly downward-facing chevron. The "It Hurts" reaction is already there to use. This up-and-down-arrow rating system lacks all of what we already have, and I don't see what's necessary about it. There isn't a purpose for two different rating systems besides worthless clutter.
you can still use reacts on /qa/ doeI don't like these "upvotes", either. The current reactions have soul, they have character, and they actually convey complex emotion, even when the reaction is the simple "like button" itself. When I directly, plainly enjoy a post, I give it a joyous white thumb surrounded with a circle of blue. When you see that symbol, you feel agreed with. Someone has acknowledged your post, and they liked it, in the literal sense of bestowing upon it that reaction, and in the other sense, as they found some proper thought from your post, and they liked, or enjoyed, it. When you see these Reddit updoots, they have no connection to the human figure. Not one of the appendages that emerge from my hand form an upward or downward-facing chevron. My thumb does emerge from my hand, and with its rotation alone can it convey more emotion than these arrows while already fulfilling their purpose. When I laugh, my mouth does not turn into an upward-facing chevron. The "GEG!" reaction already conveys this feeling of laughter instead. When I'm pained by what I've just read, I similarly do not turn my mouth into a perfectly downward-facing chevron. The "It Hurts" reaction is already there to use. This up-and-down-arrow rating system lacks all of what we already have, and I don't see what's necessary about it. There isn't a purpose for two different rating systems besides worthless clutter.
Of course, I understand that. My argument is that there is no unique benefit or positive feature added by the upvote system. We already have all we need from the original rating system, and the downside to the upvote/downvote rating system, as drab and unimportant as bickering about rating systems may seem, is that it still takes up space that is unnecessarily taken up. It's inferior, and we've always had a superior system. On top of all of that, I now have something to argue about, so I'm going to keep arguing against upvotes.you can still use reacts on /qa/ doe