wrong!
Doll literally quit everything, glad he did. Hes only contacted to voice stuff in FNAC, thats it. You didn't get a single one right from the new cabal. Theres a couple people that werent even in the leaks, so you wouldnt know them anyways
Doll literally quit everything, glad he did. Hes only contacted to voice stuff in FNAC, thats it. You didn't get a single one right from the new cabal. Theres a couple people that werent even in the leaks, so you wouldnt know them anyways
H
HACKERMAN88
Guest
the doubt i have is immeasurable
Hoot
There's a party, a jakker's paradise
Didnt Root say Mud was one of the cabal members? Root DEFINITELY hasnt ever lied about anything(including admin identities)
King of kyrgyzstan
I like raspberry icecream
why?
maybe because hes not even part of the cabal lol, he doesnt even know half the people i picked
same guy that said ronald and nudev were different people, and root and molchat were different people
boy that cried wolf or something i know
MoonMetropolis
2024 oldGOD
So, I just learned of this today, but I actually support this decision from @ROOT. That might be surprising considering my rabid hatred of pedophiles, but, as I have stated before: IMO, Soylita is only coal when it's being used by pedophiles. In and of itself, it's just the young version of Femjak. Or, at least, that was my understanding of it, anyways. There are a thrembillion images that feature Soylita and the vast majority of them don't have any sexualized or pedophilic overtones of any sort. In fact, I often see Soylita images that are outright making fun of pedophiles, e.g. the one with Soylita as an FBI agent. I've posted images that included Soylita/Shoyta on numerous occasions, and I would never post anything that I thought was made with pedophilic intentions.
Posting Soylita/Shoyta should be permitted as long as the variants are being posted in a non-sexualized/non-pedophilic context. With that said, the names of the variants themselves - Soylita and Shoyta - are certainly very problematic, to say the least. The names were probably meant to be ironic at first, but the names definitely made these variants seem highly appealing to unironic pedophiles. However, we absolutely shouldn't let pedophiles claim any soyjak variants as their own - not even Soylita (hell, especially not Soylita, considering that it's the only child soyjak variant).
Posting Soylita/Shoyta should be permitted as long as the variants are being posted in a non-sexualized/non-pedophilic context. With that said, the names of the variants themselves - Soylita and Shoyta - are certainly very problematic, to say the least. The names were probably meant to be ironic at first, but the names definitely made these variants seem highly appealing to unironic pedophiles. However, we absolutely shouldn't let pedophiles claim any soyjak variants as their own - not even Soylita (hell, especially not Soylita, considering that it's the only child soyjak variant).
Last edited:
Similar threads
