Lism
POOP!!!!! POOP POOP PEE!!!!
It is impossible to be xenophobic and not racist. It is possible to be racist and not xenophobic, but if you are xenophobic and not racist you have a skewed understanding of what a nation is.
Racism Census: /srs/ edition
- Thread starter Xiuhcoyotl
- Start date
I consider myself Vietnamese because I am of full Vietnamese descent and speak the language and practice the culture. I assume if you don't consider yourself Mexican despite being born there, you're not ethnically Mestizo or Mesoamerican, or you don't use Spanish on a daily basis or practice Mexican culture.
Also, why are you being so mean lately?
ILoveCoals
Nihahahaha!
She's having a period
BASIL'S A WOMAN? Or is xhe a troon and her "period" is actually just bloody shart?
basil
spent 440 quid on JW the game aquatic packs award
i talk in spanish with my parents and rarely other people, but nothing else. it’s honestly just because i don’t care about culture or nationality. me knowing spanish is just better in the workplace, because i have better outreach.
Lism
POOP!!!!! POOP POOP PEE!!!!
Yes I am "racist", and I would consider anyone on this forum who is not racist to either be intentionally ignorant or intellectually dishonest. The term "racist" though is stupid and just a pejorative, how racist does someone have to be to be "a racist"?
Remember. Racism does not mean "Mean". Racism means "believes race is real and meaningful, especially if one is partial to their own race", which I do and I think most of you do too.
Remember. Racism does not mean "Mean". Racism means "believes race is real and meaningful, especially if one is partial to their own race", which I do and I think most of you do too.
Well, you and I are different in that matter, which is probably why I consider myself Vietnamese and you don't consider yourself Mexican.
Also, avoided about my question about being mean lately award
Aedra
Well-known schlogga
Atatürk would disagree. That's all I will say.
I keep reading Atatürk as "Attackaturk" like it's some pokemon or something
Lism
POOP!!!!! POOP POOP PEE!!!!
Ataturk was operating defensively against the western powers, he couldn't afford to be some sort of Turanist or imperialist. I have never seen evidence that he was not racist though
Aedra
Well-known schlogga
He explicitly spoke out against Turanism/Pan-Turkism in his rather famous book "Nutuk". In another book called "Türk Tarihinin Ana Hatları" which was published in 1930 under his leadership, this is written:
"The differences seen today between races are of little historical significance. Although skull shape is used to classify races, it has no social meaning..."
NigKiller_Tojo
Imperial NiggerKiller - Second Class
Ataturk was a leftist so no surprise. I heard the party he made is the leftist libshit party in turkey
Aedra
Well-known schlogga
He wasn't.
NigKiller_Tojo
Imperial NiggerKiller - Second Class
then why is his party the party predditors cheer for
We have to comprehend the context of the OP's intention, as well, which was, as he pointed out with a "True" reaction to a previous post of mine (in the thread on this topic before this one), to ask about prejudice regarding ethnic race, rather than a belief in some form of significance involving ethnic race and genetics. I think, in the way you're describing it, yes, we'd all be "racist" from even the slightest fashion of belief, as it's obvious that genetics are an aspect to racial difference and that, psychologically, people will, through their own, human nature of their mind, prefer their own over others, naturally, not always to huge extents, but (and I will use this word "general" often), in a general sense. This is truly scientific, being one of the most documented bonds of people set to their own paths, who were divided or united by their tribal/ethnic connections even as we view in holy scripture with the warring civilizations of the ancient days, and true science does not deny truth, unlike most regular "science" today, so this is not a bad science that we can not see truth in. However, I believe that your conversation with Aedra is in some way a misunderstanding between either of you. Aedra interprets the word in the manner of prejudice and hatred of different races, and you interpret it in the manner of acknowledging broad racial characteristic differences through the genetics of the ethnic blood of that general race (i.e people of the same race are generally better at some things than other races, generally and in slightness, as there is still a present equality in the physical human form [from our creation in the image of The Lord] that is then influenced through genetic difference which is in itself influenced by one's ethnic blood). He, therefore, doesn't believe himself to fall under the term, as it has a different meaning to him as it does to you, so I believe that's the real conundrum, here.
Aedra
Well-known schlogga
It got subverted during the early 2000's just as the Turkish Islamists got subverted. It was originally not cucked. Kemalism, that is true kemalism is nothing like western ideologies. Today's subverted kemalists want Turkey to be in the EU, for it to get westernized and all that. But kemalists in the past to the contrary were against westernization and they saw their ideology as something that rises up against western imperialism for the sake of creating an independent Turkey. Atatürk was the same. The portrayal of him as some kind of cucked westernizer is false and it is done intentionally to make people forget who he really was.
ILoveCoals
Nihahahaha!
What country are we talking about here?
Aedra
Well-known schlogga
Turkey qualifies lol.
