That's North Africa bruh, inhabited mostly by Arabs, they don't really have any valid reason to dislike blacks though. For some reason Arabs had a tendency to treat blacks as subhuman even if they converted to Islam. The Ottomans were nicer in comparison.
Aren't whites supposed to be the creation of evil Yakub while blacks were the OG good men or is that just fanfiction ?
See for yourself, the Arabs enslaved BBC warriors for far longer than whites did. Not to say cumskins are free of any guilt, doebeit.
Yeah but the ytboi slave trade was a triangle or something while this one was trans inclusive yeah ::amerimutt::See for yourself, the Arabs enslaved BBC warriors for far longer than whites did. Not to say cumskins are free of any guilt, doebeit.
Trans-Saharan slave trade - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Another thing I find funny is when they try to blame all Christians or whites based on that. Like for example, Orthodox civilization never really subjugated others and was instead subjugated and oppressed for most of its history. But apparently we're also le evil colonizers and raycist pigs. Russia even helped Ethiopia in defeating the Italians during the scramble for Africa.
>Also Yuropoors converted african bvlls to christianity by force, forcing them to leave their hecking wholesomerino pagan religions of mutilating female genitals or something evendough one of the oldest christian communities that most certainly predates a lot of european christian communities started there and is still alive to this day
It's more about recognizing you as an equal. "You're just like those Europeans who conquered all of Africa, Asia and America! You are equal to them!" sounds better than "You've always been oppressed, just like the Africans, Indians and Native Americans whom we conquered and exterminated!".
Never happened, never will happen. Orthodoxy rejects papism precisely for this reason. You want to assume bad intent under every action ever taken because you're a subverter tranny. Now kys.
But that was the official policy of the Tsars. That's why they needed Constantinople - to "de facto" become the center of Eastern Christianity. And that's not a bad intention, it would be very beneficial for Russia, so I support it. Although now of course it is impossible, because there are no Tsars, no Imperial ROC, and the modern Russian Orthodox Church partially controlled by the European WCC.
And in the end, it became their doom, the Empire fell and the Russian Patriarchate was re-established under Tikhon. You don't mess with such theological matters and get away with it without punishment. So as I said : never happened, never will happen. Peter the "Great" was a westernized cuck who should have died a more painful death.
I think Peter did everything right, and thanks to him Russia did not turn into the Ottoman Empire or even the British Raj.
Islam was founded at the start of 7th Century, this happened in the 525. So whats your point?
He did no such thing. His Western-based foreign/domestic policy lead to a stagnation in both the army and the empire.
He was the one who pulled Russia out of the oriental ignorance and achieved in a short period of time what other countries took centuries to achieve. Thanks to him, Russia was part of the Western World for 200 years.
this makes no sense they only adopted basic government form. similar to going from feudal monarchy to absolute monarchy.
why do sandniggers hate pavement apes so much?
I'm just joking nigga. Although I will point out that the Himyarites were a collection of Arabian tribes that had converted to Judaism, so the Axumites were still conquering the Arabs.
