How many times do we need to see the same people arguing with Basil and princesskitty in unrelated threads?
Make a rule to ban all derailment
- Thread starter Weebhunter3000
- Start date
We should mandate these people to make threads specifically so that arguments that brew from their interference in other threads can be transported there. Parkles already has her blog thread but Basil doesn't really have a significant thread about himself yet. Might be necessary for one to be made, then, considering his controversy. Hagon could tell Basil to kill himself all he wanted in one thread instead of multiplying that message in a variety of threads where he shows up in. In addition, a ban on derailment could further enforce this, requiring people who want to ask thread-unrelated questions to other people to rather post in threads pertaining to said person or just ask them on their profile. I did this today when talking to Parkles about an Islamic hadith that I was curious about, albeit I think I see it too often where a thread topic is completely defied for this sort of reason.
Basil already has a blog. Perhaps I’ll move all convos to their respective blogs and start dishing out warnings to the perpetrator.
I
istanbul
Guest
this nigger always has the worst ideas around, thank god his admin status is only a cosmetic
Why are you against this rule?
I transheart opening a hundred message thread to see nothing discussed about the topic.
I
istanbul
Guest
unnecessary rulecucking
Do we ban people for interacting 'parkles and basil? Do we need a special rule for just two users?
If anything, if you consider this to be a big enough problem that it needs to ne addressed by the site's administration, then, rather than making a whole new rule, wouldn't it be easier to just ban these two troublemaking people?
Do note I support neither, because the fucking IGNORE button is free to be used at any time on any user that is an annoying faggot.
Maybe increase posts per page so it's less bad
I don't think bans are in order at all. Just move the content to the threads about these people, or delete it if that isn't a possibility. A rule can be created without such harsh punishment. Albeit, maybe making this a standard administrative policy to deal with thread derailment, rather than a rule, could also be a better solution.
I
istanbul
Guest
I mean, go ahead if you will.
If you are going to make it a rule after all then people are just going to stop interacting with basil all together because his whole schtick is to be an annoying ragebaiting faggot that adds absolutely nothing to the conversation.
'parkles has never gotten on my nerves though personally, I find him to be alright.
basil
spent 440 quid on JW the game aquatic packs award
i do add to the conversation.
i cant believe all of you think i'm this annoying person.
Can’t enforce it without the boss’s approval anyway. I’m just throwing out ideas.
The Boss™ is a sensible man. I think he'll see the wisdom in an idea like this.
I
istanbul
Guest
basil
spent 440 quid on JW the game aquatic packs award
oh, so you want this forum to become a kiwifarms copy where everything is so bureaucratic?
it is in soyjak.party nature to start fighting in random threads because some SLF of the hour is hurting your feelings.
i can't believe this.
The way I see it, the Shlog is a forum for funny and interesting discussion that is snugly-fit around 'jakker culture, not tightly or loosely-fit, as there's a balance of threads that completely pertain to 'jaks, threads that have nothing to directly do with 'jaks, and threads that have some reference and correlation to 'jaks, but not entirely. As a whole, the site is diverse in its content with that overarching affiliation to the 'party still being present. One thing that we do not directly have in common with the 'party already is the format of the site. On the 'party, threads come and go daily, and it's rare one could last for more than a day or two's worth of time. On the Shlog, this is not exactly the case. Most threads last for multiple days at a time, and things are slower-paced. In doing this, we get our own humorous and effort-filled discussion, but that discussion can be hijacked in its growth of becoming great and memorable by thread derailment, which resets its topic and lowers this progress. As such, thread derailment is an important issue in combating as a means of making the site better as a whole, no matter the bureaucracy that you might find from decisions to combat this issue. We are not soyjak.party, and so we do not have to entirely match it. This was the point of the Shlog's creation; a different format of a 'jakker community, and so it is only realistic for one to expect differentiation from the 'party's format and way-of-posting.
basil
spent 440 quid on JW the game aquatic packs award
u are entitled to ur own opinion.
it's not gonna happen anways.
Basil, you're being a doubter, and that's making you a loser. You don't want to be a loser. I'd advise you to look at this in a positive light. There's a chance that such a change could happen, as such a change would better the Shlog, and I'm sure you and me both want a better, happier Shlog, where you won't have Hagon telling you to kill yourself, for example, don't you agree? I think he would stop telling you to die if thread derailment was slackened and halted, as that would mean no one could suddenly pop in and start yelling at you if you were in a thread stating your own opinion and minding your own business. Still, that would also mean you'd have to do your own part to not derail threads, but would you do all that, and make that sacrifice, to help us all make the Shlog a better place? I think you would, Basil, because I know you're a good person on the inside.
N
NekoRightsActivist
Guest
can be happened if we forbid thread derailment and low quality threads
Similar threads
- Aedra
- /q/ - The Shlog Meta
Meta
Remove Rule 5
- istanbul
- /q/ - The Shlog Meta
