>Is it bad that I as a dude want a woman to do that stuff to me?
>I'm not a conservative. Conservativism affirms the enlightenment values of "equality, liberty, and fraternity," all of which go against my ideals. I believe in hierarchies and the divine right to rule. The degeneracy I talk about go further back the last two hundred years, and stems from the Protestant Revolt. The "real issues" you talk about are all materialist bread-and-circuses bullshit.
>But do we really want more wealth though? With wealth comes hedonism, decadence and degeneracy. It's no coincidence that the richest country in the world also has the highest levels of sexual degeneracy and materialism. I'm neither a socialist nor a communist--I oppose capitalism from the right--but capitalism only provides one with bread and circuses. Before capitalism and the enlightenment, we might have been poor, but at least we had our morals.
>No, opposite side of the right-wing spectrum (authoritarian end). Personally, I think libertarianism is the worst ideology ever created. Not only do they support a system which causes and furthers degeneracy and hedonism, they also condone said degeneracy in the name of "personal autonomy". Third position usually means right-wing anti-capitalism, not "enlightened centrism" or whatever those fence-sitters call themselves. Centrists are only centrists because they benefit from the status quo.
>Conflating such materialistic things such as wealth and technological advancement as success is the reason why the modern west is falling. Jesus said "it is easier for a camel to enter into the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to enter into heaven." He didn't say that because the rich "hog all the wealth for themselves" like the socialists/communists say, but because wealth causes a person to become degenerate. The Catholic and Orthodox monks got this; unfortunately, modern society doesn't.
ohnonononononnonono acro if you are reading this nigga u 18 or something stop THIS DELETE REDDIT DELETE THE 'CORD
