Chud Its time to abandon linux

Does Rust still build in binary blobs into everything you compile? Troons like to shill Rust nowadays because it's "le memory safe" or something, even though the idea that low-level programming can be "memory-safe" at any point in time is utterly fucking retarded, due to the fact how kernel development takes place in Ring 0, which is the highest point of privilege in an OS, therefore touching anything you're not supposed to can cause a segfault. How is Rust even gonna prevent that? I think it's time for kernel devs to RETVRN to writing proper and clean ASM code. Also x86 is bloated and gay architecture
 
Hey nagolbud I really love tails but all my files are gone again?????

geg.png
 
>muh steam
do steam cucks really?
how many times have you compiled the linux kernel or firefox?
remeber this cargo will make the xz backdoor look like nothing when cargo pulls 400 micro dependecies from the (((cloud))) and on top of that cargo is insecure
also rust in the kernel is full of unsafe and whats the point of using a "memory safe" language then
View attachment 38355
like five times on a chromebook.
 
i need cuda
openbsd works fine on my thinkpad
That's all it's good for really – headless servers, VMs and Thinkpads.
Linux took 30 years and a horde of troon neets to get to a usable state. BSD is behind in that regard. Besides your claims about rust being a CIA plant... It is a good language and the memory safety is to die for in the kernel, but lack of ABI is alarming. Someone is gotta force those troons to choose an ABI, and I hope linux kernel does it. After than, we just need GNU implementation of a compiler to be way from the rust foundation's bullshit.
 
That's all it's good for really – headless servers, VMs and Thinkpads.
Linux took 30 years and a horde of troon neets to get to a usable state. BSD is behind in that regard. Besides your claims about rust being a CIA plant... It is a good language and the memory safety is to die for in the kernel, but lack of ABI is alarming. Someone is gotta force those troons to choose an ABI, and I hope linux kernel does it. After than, we just need GNU implementation of a compiler to be way from the rust foundation's bullshit.
rust is tranny nulang that doesn't even have dynamic linking and need a nightly build of the compiler to even build rust for linux
it also pulls 2gb worth of backdoored microdependecies with cargo creating dependency hell like npn or pip
the cia, nsa and globohomo open source opponets are pushing for it to destroy linux
Ojeda remarked that there were many big developers with an interest in “Rust in the kernel being successful” – including Google, Microsoft, AWS and many others. “So let’s make it happen,” he urged.
 
rust is tranny nulang that doesn't even have dynamic linking and need a nightly build of the compiler to even build rust for linux
it also pulls 2gb worth of backdoored microdependecies with cargo creating dependency hell like npn or pip
the cia, nsa and globohomo open source opponets are pushing for it to destroy linux

As I said, we need proper ABI so one can use proper libraries and I think linux may be the thing that causes the change. Also, I assume most of the rust modules can be removed through modules.
 
Back
Top