ITS THE END OF THE SHLOG AS WE KNOW IT AND I FEEL FINE

[meijak]

Shitskin debate loser above DNI.

 

[Warrior-Z]

Kek notice how the agugupedo reacted trvke to the message above me? Couldn't even refute what I said, because I am FAR too intellectually superior.

 

[265121297]

Kek notice how the agugupedo reacted trvke to the message above me? Couldn't even refute what I said, because I am FAR too intellectually superior.

You worship a pedophile who raped a 9 year old when he was 53.

 

[Warrior-Z]

You worship a pedophile who raped a 9 year old when he was 53.

We can debate that here and now, Indian Jew.

 

[265121297]

We can debate that here and now, Indian Jew.

Give me your argument. Don't send me a google doc like a coward.

 

[Warrior-Z]

Give me your argument. Don't send me a google doc like a coward.

The Google Document in question contains the argument and evidence, hows that cowardice?

 

[Warrior-Z]

@265121297 You're already getting slapped up son.

 

[265121297]

The Google Document in question contains the argument and evidence, hows that cowardice?

It's gish galloping. You present a ton of arguments without writing them yourselves because you know that I'm not going to take the time to read and refute them all. If you were brave you would type out the best evidence yourself.

@265121297 You're already getting slapped up son.

Nigga it's been 3 minutes.

 

[Warrior-Z]

@265121297 KEEP TAKING LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ KEEP RUNNING FROM ME SON, PATHETIC ASS CUCK GOT SLUMPED WIT HIS BF NAMED @meijak

 

[Warrior-Z]

It's gish galloping. You present a ton of arguments without writing them yourselves because you know that I'm not going to take the time to read and refute them all.

The definition of a gish gallop would essentially be a rhetorical move, I am not trying to be rhetorical here when I am focusing on the substance.
Since the formatting of dialectic is text, you'd obviously have time to go through these and make refutations for the argument, we haven't agreed on a burden of rejoinder so no.

If you were brave you would type out the best evidence yourself.

In which is typed out within the doc.

Nigga it's been 3 minutes.

Cope bitch.

 

[meijak]

@265121297 KEEP TAKING LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ KEEP RUNNING FROM ME SON, PATHETIC ASS CUCK GOT SLUMPED WIT HIS BF NAMED @meijak

You stayed up til like 7am debating jimbo, bro.

 

[Warrior-Z]

You stayed up til like 7am debating jimbo, bro.

It was the weekend so it's fine, I have a pretty stable sleep schedule now.

 

[_73]

You niggas cant go one thread without derailing it into some bs, no wonder were the laughing stock of the soysphere

 

[Warrior-Z]

You niggas cant go one thread without derailing it into some bs, no wonder were the laughing stock of the soysphere

Didn't this thread run it's course a long time ago? Also lucky me, I'm a booruteen and not a schlogloser.

 

[meijak]

You niggas cant go one thread without derailing it into some bs, no wonder were the laughing stock of the soysphere

'debating' Warrior-Z is schlog kulchur, shemmyclock.

 

[265121297]

The definition of a gish gallop would essentially be a rhetorical move, I am not trying to be rhetorical here when I am focusing on the substance.
Since the formatting of dialectic is text, you'd obviously have time to go through these and make refutations for the argument, we haven't agreed on a burden of rejoinder so no.

In which is typed out within the doc.

Cope bitch.

This might have been a valid argument if you didn't claim victory when it take me 3 minutes to respond.

You didn't type that.

I'm not coping. I'm laughing at you.

 

[Mongoloigul]

I have an Iraqi friend who would love to take him!

 

[Username:Required]

The definition of a gish gallop would essentially be a rhetorical move, I am not trying to be rhetorical here when I am focusing on the substance.
Since the formatting of dialectic is text, you'd obviously have time to go through these and make refutations for the argument, we haven't agreed on a burden of rejoinder so no.

In which is typed out within the doc.

Cope bitch.

You take this site too seriously

 

[Catter]

I could tell warrior-z was here when I read the amount of pages

 

[jimbo]

I could tell warrior-z was here when I read the amount of pages

this nigga never knows when to stfu