- Joined
- Sep 12, 2024
- Messages
- 472
Yeah, so I don't really understand why you're saying vicarius means anti.“Vicar of Christ” means “in the place of Christ.”
"substitute of christ"
VICAR of CHRIST
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah, so I don't really understand why you're saying vicarius means anti.“Vicar of Christ” means “in the place of Christ.”
"substitute of christ"
VICAR of CHRIST
Because its the same thing... just more literal.Yeah, so I don't really understand why you're saying vicarius means anti.
Don't you follow a heresy that was condemned in the 5th century?@eeeeeeeee
For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect. - Matthew 24:24
Many new research papers are now written with AI slop and make little sense, there's a particular phrase, typically "In conclusion" has seen a massive spike at the end of studies, 50% of all papers submitted past after 2010 were already using bad information, it's going to get worseImagine how many "experts" are graduating by using AI...
Imagine going to an expert, doctor, dentist, ect. ect. that graduated colleged strictly using AI...
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA society is FUCKEDDDD... I mean it was fucked, now it's just funny... normies + college + AI = the movie Idiocracy...
WELCOME TO THE FUTURE!

Don't even start with your faggot ass pharisee church fathers shit.Don't you follow a heresy that was condemned in the 5th century?
Hahahahahahaha yeah, very true. I mock this with my Chud posts...Many new research papers are now written with AI slop and make little sense, there's a particular phrase, typically "In conclusion" has seen a massive spike at the end of studies, 50% of all papers submitted past after 2010 were already using bad information, it's going to get worse
I probably should have elaborated more but papers shouldn't have such human ways of writing incorporated, they should just detail what was done, how it was done, and why it was done. They also should have all of the data incorporated, and should not be self-censoring or lying for good results, but unless they falsify the results, they will not get fundingHahahahahahaha yeah, very true. I mock this with my Chud posts...
"Chudclusion"
"In chudclusion.."
This is a very gemmy post. You getit bro.
It's important to-Many new research papers are now written with AI slop and make little sense, there's a particular phrase, typically "In conclusion" has seen a massive spike at the end of studies, 50% of all papers submitted past after 2010 were already using bad information, it's going to get worse
![]()
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Replication crisis - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
View attachment 41669
All true. Convid is the perfect example of this...I probably should have elaborated more but papers shouldn't have such human ways of writing incorporated, they should just detail what was done, how it was done, and why it was done. They also should have all of the data incorporated, and should not be self-censoring or lying for good results, but unless they falsify the results, they will not get funding
AI is just a gimmick, but the latter is true, some half of all websites are entirely AI slop, and most services will already force you to use phone numbers, major services, etc.All true. Convid is the perfect example of this...
Not sure if you saw this but you'll enjoy it.
The first roll out of a AI false flag was 9/11. Not so much a gimmick when they can control entire countries with it...AI is just a gimmick, but the latter is true, some half of all websites are entirely AI slop, and most services will already force you to use phone numbers, major services, etc.
The video is also AI-assisted and mostly required human interaction, they already have that in China
What's ACTUALLY going to be a problem is if information is going to be correct/accurate
Also: The number of retractions has grown tenfold over the past decade, but they still make up approximately 0.2% of the 1.4m papers published annually in scholarly journals.[2]
![]()
Invalid science - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
My grandfather worked in the navy, specifically on GPS when it wasn't released. He was also an electrician for the military.GPS was created by the military and used for almost 50 years before they gave it to the public...
Can you tell me their secrets?My grandfather worked in the navy, specifically on GPS when it wasn't released. He was also an electrician for the military.
It's already been released, really.Can you tell me their secrets?
It's crazy how Hiroshima had permanent shadows.It's already been released, really.
He also did nuclear testing which I think is the coolest.
It's crazy how Hiroshima had permanent shadows.
Fake and gay. They rebuilt the city within a year of the fire bombings...He also did nuclear testing which I think is the coolest.
nagolbud.com
In many cases you can't. I've fooled most of the normies here just pretending to be AI and vice versa. They have no idea what's real and what isn't.How to detect AI text books, news, etc?
You can't unless you train an AI against a specific model which will have certain patterns, and there are loads of modelsHow to detect AI text books, news, etc?