Discussion "If it doesn't harm anybody, it's not wrong"

S

SoytanEnthusiast

Guest
I made this thread because I wanted to share something I thought. Today, I, as many people do, was watching a YouTube video. In the video, it was covering some zoophile nigger. The host, who supports transgenderism and homosexuality, upon hearing the zoophile say "After I hunt and kill the animal, I can have sex with it. If it doesn't harm anybody, it's not wrong." The host started going off on a tangent calling it "wrong on so many levels and just because it doesn't hurt anybody doesn't mean it's not wrong." What I'm wondering is, why does this talking point work in regards to transgenderism and homosexuality, but not zoophilia? If transgenderism and homosexality are fine if they're done by consenting adults, why is fucking the dead body of an animal wrong? It's not like it hurts anybody.
 
This line of logic is literally just “rules for thee but not for me” since you can apply it to everything morally wrong, sure it isn’t hurting anyone but you can say the same thing while pointing a gun at someone while demanding their money. And if you try to pass judgement then it leads to the slope of non-arguments and guilt tripping
 
Malzy_Moo said:
This line of logic is literally just “rules for thee but not for me” since you can apply it to everything morally wrong, sure it isn’t hurting anyone but you can say the same thing while pointing a gun at someone while demanding their money. And if you try to pass judgement then it leads to the slope of non-arguments and guilt tripping
Click to expand...
Literal trvthnvke
 
All the arguments for the normalization of homosexuality could also be used to normalize incest. Ask anyone, even an AI why incest is bad and suddenly everyone supports eugenics and avoiding the moral degradation of society.
Clown world.
Just in case some nigger with no reading comprehension jumps at me, I am saying both are bad, and degenerate yet one is shunned and the other is not for some reason.
 
istanbul said:
All the arguments for the normalization of homosexuality could also be used to normalize incest. Ask anyone, even an AI why incest is bad and suddenly everyone supports eugenics and avoiding the moral degradation of society.
Clown world.
Just in case some nigger with no reading comprehension jumps at me, I am saying both are bad, and degenerate yet one is shunned and the other is not for some reason.
Click to expand...
For any nigger with no reading comprehension, this is what I was saying in my original post
 
istanbul said:
There was no misunderstanding, what's the need for this post?
Click to expand...
In the end, one can understand you as defending incest. I assumed that one can understand my last question "What is wrong with fucking the dead body of an animal?" as defending necrozoophilia, so I made that comment. Also I can make posts whenever I want fuck you nigga Selfish Little Fuck
 
SoytanEnthusiast said:
In the end, one can understand you as defending incest. I assumed that one can understand my last question "What is wrong with fucking the dead body of an animal?" as defending necrozoophilia, so I made that comment. Also I can make posts whenever I want fuck you nigga Selfish Little Fuck
Click to expand...
Oh, sorry then, forgive me for the unwarranted hostility [wholesome]
 
Back
Top