>Getting Warrior-Z cancelled from powerscaling by making an exposé video about him being an antisemitic transphobe

[meijak]

Does the existence of "gravitational waves" (assuming they exist) imply that time exists as a 4th dimension in the universe?

I'm new to thinking about special and general relativity and I have no formal training as a physicist. However, I've been doing a bit of thinking about spacetime recently. I was wondering if "

physics.stackexchange.com

Julian Barbour - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

If you want, I could explain these two for you.

>Does the existence of "gravitational waves" (assuming they exist) imply that time exists as a 4th dimension in the universe?
>a 4th dimension
>a dimension

 

[Warrior-Z]

>Does the existence of "gravitational waves" (assuming they exist) imply that time exists as a 4th dimension in the universe?
>a 4th dimension
>a dimension

You do realise that existing in multiple dimensions is contradictory, right?
That's why many argue that time is simply the 4th dimension.

 

[meijak]

You do realise that existing in multiple dimensions is contradictory, right?
That's why many argue that time is simply the 4th dimension.

What the fuck are you even on about? I said time is 1 dimensional to which you disagreed and said "time is 4th dimensional" whatever that means. I will catch downs if I keep talking to you.

 

[Gigafly]

You do realise that existing in multiple dimensions is contradictory, right?
That's why many argue that time is simply the 4th dimension.

We all live in multiple dimensions retard. We live in three spacial ones.

 

[Warrior-Z]

What the fuck are you even on about? I said time is 1 dimensional to which you disagreed and said "time is 4th dimensional" whatever that means. I will catch downs if I keep talking to you.

You're literally misunderstanding "1 dimensional", time moves in one direction (forward), but that’s not what makes it "1-dimensional."
It’s part of the 4D spacetime continuum in Einstein’s theory of relativity, where it’s connected with the three spatial dimensions (length, width, height). Because time itself is linked to space and affected by gravity and velocity (time dilation).

 

[Warrior-Z]

We all live in multiple dimensions retard. We live in three spacial ones.

We're not talking about the third dimension? Did this retard read? LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THIS ISN'T EVEN WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT

 

[Warrior-Z]

We all live in multiple dimensions retard. We live in three spacial ones.

If you're willing to get slammed on the topic of spatial dimensions I'll gladly engage.

 

[meijak]

We're not talking about the third dimension? Did this retard read? LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO THIS ISN'T EVEN WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT

You do realise that existing in multiple dimensions is contradictory, right?

 

[Warrior-Z]

^^
We aren't in the same ontological plane as time? Like what?

 

[Warrior-Z]

Terrific, these guys can barely track basic dimensionality.

 

[Warrior-Z]

>my name is warrior-z, and i am watching 'p
>gooning to bbc, flicking my tbp
View attachment 177364

Failbait.

 

[dino]

Short & Unbiased Analysis (60 Lines Max)​

1. Core Debate: Is time 1D (M) or the 4th dimension in spacetime (Z)?
2. M’s Claim: Time flows 1D (forward); "4th dimension" = 3 space + 1 time.
3. Z’s Claim: Time is not just 1D—it’s linked to space (relativity, time dilation).
4. Miscommunication:
   • Z says "time is 4th-dimensional," meaning it’s the 4th axis in 4D spacetime.
   • M misreads this as "time has 4 dimensions," which Z never claimed.
5. Scientific Truth:
   • Both agree spacetime = 3 space + 1 time.
   • Time is 1D in direction but interacts with space (Einstein’s relativity).
6. Consensus:
   • Z cites relativity (correct) but mixes in Julian Barbour’s fringe "timeless" view.
   • M demands proof of "4D time" (a misunderstanding).
7. Who’s More Right?
   • Z on spacetime’s structure.
   • M on time’s 1D flow, but ignores relativity.
8. Root Issue: Poor phrasing (Z) + misinterpretation (M).
9. Resolution: They agree in principle but argued past each other.

Final Verdict: Both have valid points; the conflict was semantic, not factual.

Who Is More Correct?​

Aspect	M’s Argument	Z’s Argument
Dimensionality of Time	Correct that time is 1D in direction.	Correct that time is the 4th dimension in spacetime.
Relativity & Interaction	Underestimates time-space connection.	Accurately describes time’s role in 4D spacetime.
Scientific Consensus	Skeptical but doesn’t engage fully.	Cites relativity correctly but overstates "consensus" when mentioning Barbour.
Clarity	Misinterprets Z’s phrasing.	Poorly explains "4th dimension," leading to confusion.

shut the fuck up

 

[Warrior-Z]

Short & Unbiased Analysis (60 Lines Max)​

1. Core Debate: Is time 1D (M) or the 4th dimension in spacetime (Z)?
2. M’s Claim: Time flows 1D (forward); "4th dimension" = 3 space + 1 time.
3. Z’s Claim: Time is not just 1D—it’s linked to space (relativity, time dilation).
4. Miscommunication:
   • Z says "time is 4th-dimensional," meaning it’s the 4th axis in 4D spacetime.
   • M misreads this as "time has 4 dimensions," which Z never claimed.
5. Scientific Truth:
   • Both agree spacetime = 3 space + 1 time.
   • Time is 1D in direction but interacts with space (Einstein’s relativity).
6. Consensus:
   • Z cites relativity (correct) but mixes in Julian Barbour’s fringe "timeless" view.
   • M demands proof of "4D time" (a misunderstanding).
7. Who’s More Right?
   • Z on spacetime’s structure.
   • M on time’s 1D flow, but ignores relativity.
8. Root Issue: Poor phrasing (Z) + misinterpretation (M).
9. Resolution: They agree in principle but argued past each other.

Final Verdict: Both have valid points; the conflict was semantic, not factual.

Who Is More Correct?​

Aspect	M’s Argument	Z’s Argument
Dimensionality of Time	Correct that time is 1D in direction.	Correct that time is the 4th dimension in spacetime.
Relativity & Interaction	Underestimates time-space connection.	Accurately describes time’s role in 4D spacetime.
Scientific Consensus	Skeptical but doesn’t engage fully.	Cites relativity correctly but overstates "consensus" when mentioning Barbour.
Clarity	Misinterprets Z’s phrasing.	Poorly explains "4th dimension," leading to confusion.

shut the fuck up

 

[dino]

View attachment 177367

View attachment 177368
View attachment 177369

deepseek chads won + no arrow

 

[dino]

bump

 

[Warrior-Z]

bump

I think they're dead. Do we just leave it be?

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

yall b talkin bout dimensions and all that cracka ahh shit jitt ong lets js take the LLZZ together bra ong icl ts

she talks like me

 

[Mr. Thrembo 88]

Why is it so easy to bait him?

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

stop self inserting as capeshit you're brown

only trannies hate capeCHOW

 

[meijak]

Why is it so easy to bait him?

Low IQ, very likely due to inbreeding.