thread_prefix.19 General christian thread

So...he's saying don't refer to any other scripture other than Christian scripture, since they are made by men. You still haven't disproven what I've said.

You can't even read the entire Book of Galatians before crying about your gay ass religion. GO READ THE ENTIRE BOOK, or just admit you hate the Bible and worship your religion.

5 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
 
w
You can't even read the entire Book of Galatians before crying about your gay ass religion. GO READ THE ENTIRE BOOK, or just admit you hate the Bible and worship your religion.
hy read bible when you have you tuube AI videos
 
Especially chapter 3, literally destroys all religion in one chapter.

 
Last edited:
Especially chapter 3, literally destroys all religion in one chapter.

"If your wife has sex with a black man, then do not heed, take another cheek and look away. He needs to get pregnant more than you."
 
Galatians 2 simply says we're not saved by works alone, which is true. We're also not simply saved by faith since we have to do good to get into heaven.

Galatians 3 and 4 are saying that works that disobey scripture are bad, which luckily none of our tradition does.

Galatians 3 is also saying that pre-covenant law was needed before Christ, the proverbial 'schoolmaster' and now with Christ we don't need it. However this isn't saying tradition from Christ isn't needed.

And 5 & 6 are simply saying circumcision isn't good.
 
I know your religion and its history better than you do bro. I don't need you to explain anything. Go read the entire book of Galatians. It's only a few chapters...


6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.

7 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham.

8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed.
Right on Galatians 2:16-20, a passage that prots cite often. And yet, in James, you will see scripture say faith without works is dead. You are openly disregarding that.
 
Galatians 2 simply says we're not saved by works alone, which is true. We're also not simply saved by faith since we have to do good to get into heaven.

Galatians 3 and 4 are saying that works that disobey scripture are bad, which luckily none of our tradition does.

Galatians 3 is also saying that pre-covenant law was needed before Christ, the proverbial 'schoolmaster' and now with Christ we don't need it. However this isn't saying tradition from Christ isn't needed.

And 5 & 6 are simply saying circumcision isn't good.

Uhhh not even close... Galatians has nothing to do with cutting dicks. Circumcision is talked about as in cutting away flesh. Bro the entire book of Galatians is saying its faith alone. You really be twisting scripture out the ass.... like literally in fucking sanity that you would get these conclusions from reading Galatians... typical religious larpology to maintain your cult... you certainly drank the coolaide, and even scripture has no effect on your love of man.
GOR1jKzWUAA1E20.jpg


YIKES
 
Right on Galatians 2:16-20, a passage that prots cite often. And yet, in James, you will see scripture say faith without works is dead. You are openly disregarding that.

Funny how you have to quote your dumbass religion to validate this. In the chapter of James you're referring to he's literally using this as an example that it's faith alone.... and in that quote James isn't even referring to salvation... AT ALL. Ya'll are anti-Bible asf. Enjoy your religion of man.
 
he's literally using this as an example that it's faith alone.... ya'll are anti-Bible asf. Enjoy your religion of man.
What.
14 What does it profit, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can faith save him? 15 If a brother or sister is naked and destitute of daily food, 16 and one of you says to them, “Depart in peace, be warmed and filled,” but you do not give them the things which are needed for the body, what does it profit? 17 Thus also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.
You don't need to be a genius to understand what this passage is saying.
 
2 My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.

2 For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment;

3 And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool:


EVEN THE APOSTLES CALL YOUR DUMBASS PRIESTS GAY AS FUCK.


In the chapter you refer to.... HAHAHAHAHAHA GET REKT!


James 2 is talking about after salvation, not works for salvation. It doesn't say the word salvation a single time in James 2.
 
Uhhh not even close... Galatians has nothing to do with cutting dicks. Circumcision is talked about as in cutting away flesh.
1716493365984.png

So...are you going to die on this hill or not?
Bro the entire book of Galatians is saying its faith alone. You really be twisting scripture out the ass.... like literally in fucking sanity that you would get these conclusions from reading Galatians... typical religious larpology to maintain your cult... you certainly drank the coolaide, and even scripture has no effect on your love of man.
Cope more.
 
2 My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.

2 For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment;

3 And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool:


EVEN THE APOSTLES CALL YOUR DUMBASS PRIESTS GAY AS FUCK.
Not talking about anyone in priestly garments, just someone who's rich. I knew protfags were dumb but this is a new low KEEEEEEEEEK
 
2 My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons.

2 For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment;

3 And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool:


EVEN THE APOSTLES CALL YOUR DUMBASS PRIESTS GAY AS FUCK.


In the chapter you refer to.... HAHAHAHAHAHA GET REKT!
But you didn't address my point.
 
  1. James 2:19 Another reason taken of an absurdity: If such a faith were the true faith whereby we are justified, the devils should be justified: for they have that, but yet notwithstanding they tremble, and are not justified therefore, neither is that faith a true faith.
  2. James 2:20 The third reason from the example of Abraham, who no doubt had a true faith: but he in offering his son, showed himself to have that faith which was not void of works, and therefore he received a true testimony when it was said, that faith was imputed to him for righteousness.
  3. James 2:21 Was he not by his works known and found to be justified? for he speaketh not here of the causes of justification, but by what effects we may know that a man is justified.
  4. James 2:22 Was effectual and fruitful with good works.
NOTHING TO DO WITH SALVATION.
 
Circumcised of the LAW. He is saying CUT AWAY THE FUCKING LAW, NOT YOUR DICK, retard.
Well then. He's still talking about pre-covenant law from before Jesus. I mean...dick chopping is pre-covenant law ironically.
  1. James 2:19 Another reason taken of an absurdity: If such a faith were the true faith whereby we are justified, the devils should be justified: for they have that, but yet notwithstanding they tremble, and are not justified therefore, neither is that faith a true faith.
  2. James 2:20 The third reason from the example of Abraham, who no doubt had a true faith: but he in offering his son, showed himself to have that faith which was not void of works, and therefore he received a true testimony when it was said, that faith was imputed to him for righteousness.
  3. James 2:21 Was he not by his works known and found to be justified? for he speaketh not here of the causes of justification, but by what effects we may know that a man is justified.
  4. James 2:22 Was effectual and fruitful with good works.
NOTHING TO DO WITH SALVATION.
14: "Can one be saved by faith alone?" *disproves such*
Faggot protnigger disproven yet again award
 
Well then. He's still talking about pre-covenant law from before Jesus. I mean...dick chopping is pre-covenant law ironically.


Faggot protnigger disproven yet again award

Nice job mis-quoting the Bible... again. I'm not a protestant. Just admit you hate the Bible and Bible believers in place of your religion. Just admit it...

14 [c]What availeth it my brethren, though a man saith, he hath faith, when he hath no works? can that faith save him?

He's asking the question.. to validate faith from knowledge of God, from FAITH in what Jesus Christ DID. In reference to the DEVILS that know He exists, but do not have LIVING FAITH.

The fifth place which hangeth very well with the former treatise, touching a true and lively faith. And the proposition of this place is this: faith which bringeth not forth works, is not that faith whereby we are justified, but an image of faith: or else this, they are not justified by faith, which show not the effects of faith.

Another reason taken of an absurdity: If such a faith were the true faith whereby we are justified, the devils should be justified: for they have that, but yet notwithstanding they tremble, and are not justified therefore, neither is that faith a true faith.
 
Nice job mis-quoting the Bible... again. I'm not a protestant. Just admit you hate the Bible and Bible believers in place of your religion. Just admit it...

14 [c]What availeth it my brethren, though a man saith, he hath faith, when he hath no works? can that faith save him?

He's asking the question.. to validate faith from knowledge of God, from FAITH in what Jesus Christ DID. In reference to the DEVILS that know He exists, but do not have LIVING FAITH.

The fifth place which hangeth very well with the former treatise, touching a true and lively faith. And the proposition of this place is this: faith which bringeth not forth works, is not that faith whereby we are justified, but an image of faith: or else this, they are not justified by faith, which show not the effects of faith.

Another reason taken of an absurdity: If such a faith were the true faith whereby we are justified, the devils should be justified: for they have that, but yet notwithstanding they tremble, and are not justified therefore, neither is that faith a true faith.
No, he's bringing up the devils as to why faith without works is absurd and wouldn't work.
 
Back
Top