Does racemixing have negative biological effects

Yes

Bartholomew J. Simpson
🏅
Joined
Apr 27, 2024
Messages
3,524
should i trust da joos or the shitskins on /pol/
 
Last edited:
1730873145192.jpeg

i mean, just look at our standing president
 
Nature says no, we crossbreed crops and livestock all the time to produce stronger offsprings. The best argument you can make is that the offspring is no longer specialized to thrive in a particular climate as well as their "pure" parents. That said, it's not exactly ideal to have such low social cohesion that everyone's freely courting another race, the offspring will have it the worst, being forced to live their whole lives unsure of their identity.
 
I agree with the socio-cultural aspect of race mixing, I oppose it as to not strain the child over cultural identity, especially in America with multiple overreaching cultural and sub-cultural groups
 
why defy the ethnicity GOD gave you by mixing with le bbc shitskins (although it's a fake porn stereotype niggers are avg)
 
it's literally been proven by Science™ that racemixed babies have higher chances of all sorts of diseases.
 
Look vt vmerican history, look vt our genes, and þen vsk yourself why the vmerican rvce mogs every other rvce on evrþ.
 
Some. Not in a way that makes people of two races utterly inferior or disabled, obviously, but it can have some negative health consequences for them. I'm sure we've heard before of the bone marrow transplant conundrums that can happen.
 
Disregard the jartytake above, rvcemixing is how we got the vmericvn rvce where it is today, at the peak of the world
 
Back
Top