Debunking that aisha underage

I've reduced the length of the ban to 1 week after asking this in an instagram group (that was made because these obsessed faggots can't live without urgentcord)
1724283660198.png

There's no place for child marriage in the modern world.
 
Last edited:
I've reduced the length of the ban to 1 week after asking this in an instagram group (that was made because these obsessed faggots can't live without urgentcord)
View attachment 31733
There's no place for child marriage in the modern world.
>Well after being permad the pedophile actually changed his mind so we can let him back in now lol!
N
obody else but a Muslim could say this shit and not get permad
 
Quite the opposite
View attachment 31737

Xhe's talking about modern Age of consent law
If she cleared up that following the law is still very-much necessary, why keep her banned for an advocacy that she was mistaken in from her poor words? I hate to compare an apparent advocation of pedophilia to something more meager, like, for example, saying this site is a splinter, which is also against the rules, yet Pepsilord made that slip-up yesterday of calling the Shlog a splinter before he quickly edited it after I warned him to be cautious. Is it not the same if she also acknowledges her mistake (and there's a proper probability that she would have therefore edited her post after being called out on her word-choice in similarity to that separate instance I just mentioned) and simply didn't edit it in due time before she was banned? I'm trying to remain neutral for the sake of my own curiosity and to wonder about the justifications of this ban, so I hope I don't come off like I'm defending nor attacking 'parkles.
 
If she cleared up that following the law is still very-much necessary, why keep her banned for an advocacy that she was mistaken in from her poor words? I hate to compare an apparent advocation of pedophilia to something more meager, like, for example, saying this site is a splinter, which is also against the rules, yet Pepsilord made that slip-up yesterday of calling the Shlog a splinter before he quickly edited it after I warned him to be cautious. Is it not the same if she also acknowledges her mistake (and there's a proper probability that she would have therefore edited her post after being called out on her word-choice in similarity to that separate instance I just mentioned) and simply didn't edit it in due time before she was banned? I'm trying to remain neutral for the sake of my own curiosity and to wonder about the justifications of this ban, so I hope I don't come off like I'm defending nor attacking 'parkles.
You only say this because you like her kek. You'd be celebrating rn if it was the exact same case but with Coalyma.
 
>Well after being permad the pedophile actually changed his mind so we can let him back in now lol!
N
obody else but a Muslim could say this shit and not get permad
Fagon strawman post, ignored
I asked her if she approves of marrying nine year olds, she said yes. What's so hard to understand about this?
Xhe elaborated on her point saying she meant that in the context of Islamic times, I don't think a permaban is necessary. I have a suspicion you are getting your personal bias against xer involved.
 
You only say this because you like her kek. You'd be celebrating rn if it was the exact same case but with Coalyma.
Maybe you're right, I am just being a biased wonk, but Coalyma was an apparent 'cord pedophile, he wasn't making any slip-ups in his speech. I'm trying to understand what Oot would think of my comparison to a word slip-up that was fixed in time before the rule violation could have been acknowledged by an admin/mod, and Parkles' situation.
 
Fagon strawman post, ignored

Xhe elaborated on her point saying she meant that in the context of Islamic times, I don't think a permaban is necessary. I have a suspicion you are getting your personal bias against xer involved.
notice who’s really in power here?
 
Coalyma actually posted porn and has a history of making jokes about 'p, 'parkles does not have a history like this at all
She does have that history. It's called being Muslim. Whether you like it or not, that's what Islam advocates for.
 
So child marriage was okay back then?
Yes, it was. If you're a Jew or a Christian, you'd agree. Open up the Talmud, open the Bible and the literature related to it and see the ages at which various figures were married off or impregnated.
 
Back
Top