thread_prefix.27 Ban megathread

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Broot, since when is reaction spamming even against the rules? I mean, numerous users have done that by thousands of posts at a time. I've never heard of a single person getting banned for doing that until now. When Chimperator was a janny, I would wake up to 100+ notifications from him every single day because he would obsessively go through and Jartycuck react every single post that I made. That sort of thing happens all the time, yet now it's suddenly grounds for a permaban?
shut the fuck up nigger, stop cocksucking your tranny brony boyfriend nobody is going to miss him
 
@Broot, since when is reaction spamming even against the rules? I mean, numerous users have done that by thousands of posts at a time. I've never heard of a single person getting banned for doing that until now. When Chimperator was a janny, I would wake up to 100+ notifications from him every single day because he would obsessively go through and Jartycuck react every single post that I made. That sort of thing happens all the time, yet now it's suddenly grounds for a permaban?
This is not the hill to die on buster, he definitely needs to stay banned.
 
@Broot, since when is reaction spamming even against the rules? I mean, numerous users have done that by thousands of posts at a time. I've never heard of a single person getting banned for doing that until now. When Chimperator was a janny, I would wake up to 100+ notifications from him every single day because he would obsessively go through and Jartycuck react every single post that I made. That sort of thing happens all the time, yet now it's suddenly grounds for a permaban?
When your permanent ban for being a sexual deviant somehow gets lifted, you'd think you would try and be more cautious of the sites rules rather than continuing to be a complete nuisance and spam peoples inboxes?
 
I don't even know how he got unbanned anyways, it's a good thing he's not haunting the schlog anymore
 
When your permanent ban for being a sexual deviant somehow gets lifted, you'd think you would try and be more cautious of the sites rules rather than continuing to be a complete nuisance and spam peoples inboxes?
Again, since when is reaction spamming even against the rules, though? Why has nobody been banned for it until now?

Soygoy was banned for creating a bot to do it, but that's not the same thing. Nobody has ever been banned for doing it by hand before, nor is there any rule against it.
 
Again, since when is reaction spamming even against the rules, though? Why has nobody been banned for it until now?

Soygoy was banned for creating a bot to do it, but that's not the same thing. Nobody has ever been banned for doing it by hand before, nor is there any rule against it.
A person who has very recently been appealed after a permanent ban is not going to have the same leeway as a user with a cleaner track record.
 
Again, since when is reaction spamming even against the rules, though? Why has nobody been banned for it until now?

Soygoy was banned for creating a bot to do it, but that's not the same thing. Nobody has ever been banned for doing it by hand before, nor is there any rule against it.
ban moonmetropolis too
 
Again, since when is reaction spamming even against the rules, though? Why has nobody been banned for it until now?

Soygoy was banned for creating a bot to do it, but that's not the same thing. Nobody has ever been banned for doing it by hand before, nor is there any rule against it.
I mean maybe there's an emergency and Broot's inbox is filled with 900 gorillion jartycuck reactions so he never sees it ever. hmm
 
Screenshot_20250113_060712_Brave.jpg

Screenshot_20250113_060712_Brave.jpg

Screenshot_20250113_060712_Brave.jpg

Screenshot_20250113_060712_Brave.jpg

Screenshot_20250113_060712_Brave.jpg

Bronies, this is your mindset.
Bronies, this is your mindset.png
 
A person who has very recently been appealed after a permanent ban is not going to have the same leeway as a user with a cleaner track record.
If reaction spamming is against the rules, then the rules should say so. The rules currently don't say anything about it. I also don't see how it could possibly justify a permaban without any kind of warning being given. The poster in this case being recently unbanned for something completely unrelated is irrelevant. If @pipp is going to be banned for reaction spamming, then it certainly should not be a permaban, there should be an explicit rule against reaction spamming, and the rule should be enforced equally among all users (not just enforced on particularly annoying users who nobody likes).

I honestly feel like this is just an excuse to get rid of him when he didn't break any rules. Just like what Steve did to him before, which is why he had been banned in the first place.

I mean maybe there's an emergency and Broot's inbox is filled with 900 gorillion jartycuck reactions so he never sees it ever. hmm
See above.
 
If reaction spamming is against the rules, then the rules should say so. The rules currently don't say anything about it. I also don't see how it could possibly justify a permaban without any kind of warning being given. The poster in this case being recently unbanned for something completely unrelated is irrelevant. If @pipp is going to be banned for reaction spamming, then it certainly should not be a permaban, there should be an explicit rule against reaction spamming, and the rule should be enforced equally among all users (not just enforced on particularly annoying users who nobody likes).

I honestly feel like this is just an excuse to get rid of him when he didn't break any rules. Just like what Steve did before, which is why he had been banned in the first place.


See above.
He got perma'd because he wants to fuck a horse character. Are you just trying to keep him unbanned because you want a funny gegbull?
 
If reaction spamming is against the rules, then the rules should say so. The rules currently don't say anything about it. I also don't see how it could possibly justify a permaban without any kind of warning being given. The poster in this case being recently unbanned for something completely unrelated is irrelevant. If @pipp is going to be banned for reaction spamming, then it certainly should not be a permaban, there should be an explicit rule against reaction spamming, and the rule should be enforced equally among all users (not just enforced on particularly annoying users who nobody likes).

I honestly feel like this is just an excuse to get rid of him when he didn't break any rules. Just like what Steve did before, which is why he had been banned in the first place.


See above.
@Broot dont listen to this guy, 10 years in prison getting raped by bibiseas fried his brain
nusoi.png
 
If reaction spamming is against the rules, then the rules should say so. The rules currently don't say anything about it. I also don't see how it could possibly justify a permaban without any kind of warning being given. The poster in this case being recently unbanned for something completely unrelated is irrelevant. If @pipp is going to be banned for reaction spamming, then it certainly should not be a permaban, there should be an explicit rule against reaction spamming, and the rule should be enforced equally among all users (not just enforced on particularly annoying users who nobody likes).

I honestly feel like this is just an excuse to get rid of him when he didn't break any rules. Just like what Steve did to him before, which is why he had been banned in the first place.


See above.
I'm pretty sure making your whole online personality be about wanting to rape ponies is against the laws of common decency, and then he spams broot's inbox like a freak the second he's unbanned. There was a lot of unsaid rules that just apply here and are very valid.
 
I did. He kept spamming Gem Control's profile with some random image (like, a huge amount of times), and then when I warned him and explicitly told him that he'd get banned if he continued, he called my bluff and I wasn't bluffing.
Is it a temp, or a perm? his profile doesn't show up on the ban list
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top