I didn't discredit or take issue with the point you were making, nor did I insinuate you were malicious. I noticed a behavioral peculiarity on your part and extrapolated, with a lot of tact, an explanation. I handled it with due diligence as it is a touchy subject, I didn't antagonize you or lock you into denying or confirming anything (I do notice you call the assumptions odd, rather than false, but I'm not trying to extract a confession). The notion I was presenting is that exposure to filth makes you more sensitive to anything even loosely tangential to it. I am not a psycho analyst but it is a logical conclusion. Whether one is slightly or significantly sexually depraved, recovering or recovered, or simply scared by involuntary exposure, that he would be a lot more sensitive in regards to what he perceives to be sexual deviancy. I was not accusing you of being a "child groomer", nor did I counter signal what you said. I was extremely tactful and careful with my words.