VOTE! The REAL Thrembo....

[meijak]

Proved right without doing anything award goes to @Catter

 

[Warrior-Z]

are you esl? You start "debates" in random threads andderail them then leak all over the place until the thread gets sent to /dump/ I'm telling you to make a megathread maybe in /incel/ so you stop shitting up threads

First of all, what I said has nothing to do with English being a second language to people or the concept itself. The thing is that I never derailed the thread you guys came in talking about me of course I’m going to talk back. I am not gonna sit there and kiss anyone’s ass. I’m going to keep smashing your heads in as long as you keep talking piss.

 

[Gemerald]

Your take on this hadith is cherry-picked, you dumbass. Sure, Sahih al-Bukhari mentions a punishment for picture makers, but don't delude yourself into thinking that wide range of scholars from Malikis to Salafis to Hanbalis like Ibn Hamdan haven't long argued that the hadith is prohibiting only a full statue casting a shadow, not any image. It is the circumstance and intention that matters, as long as the art does not stray into being idolatrous, is not immoral, or obsessive, it can be okay. Also, I never said, "it's no proof because I said so", I said that I refuted what you have used as evidence so you have no proof now kek.

Technicality-Z

 

[Gigafly]

Your take on this hadith is cherry-picked, you dumbass. Sure, Sahih al-Bukhari mentions a punishment for picture makers, but don't delude yourself into thinking that wide range of scholars from Malikis to Salafis to Hanbalis like Ibn Hamdan haven't long argued that the hadith is prohibiting only a full statue casting a shadow, not any image.

Why does Aisha herself narrate otherwise then?

 

[meijak]

First of all, what I said has nothing to do with English being a second language to people or the concept itself. The thing is that I never derailed the thread you guys came in talking about me of course I’m going to talk back. I am not gonna sit there and kiss anyone’s ass. I’m going to keep smashing your heads in as long as you keep talking piss.

Detransition.

 

[Warrior-Z]

Warrior-gegbull

Nice auto concession. You can think that, doesn’t make it true. I win ez.

Why does Aisha herself narrate otherwise then?

That’s the preposition that you’re going to go ahead and try to substantiate.

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

It's a fake warning so you have no warning points
View attachment 172747
This is what Gemerald's profile looks like to me
View attachment 172748

how much do i have?

 

[Warrior-Z]

Kek I love how schlogtrannies always have to 1v5 a BooruBVLL and still lose. I’m gonna have fun archiving these threads and posting them to the Booruteens to make fun of you.

 

[meijak]

@ThremboSchlog you made this thread, come shitfling with us, you pussy.

 

[Gigafly]

That’s the preposition that you’re going to go ahead and try to substantiate.

I already did retard. Re-read my reply.

 

[Warrior-Z]

@ThremboSchlog you made this thread, come shitfling with us, you pussy.

He’s sleeping. Leave him be. I’ll be filling in for his place. I can handle 1v5s. Cmon, show me what ya got.

 

[Warrior-Z]

I already did retard. Re-read my reply.

No you didn’t? We’re talking about the direct source you just stated and I’ve already given two examples on how they reaffirm that Hadith as another premise lmao.

 

[evandoe]

Guys be quiet please

 

[Jimb0]

He’s sleeping. Leave him be. I’ll be filling in for his place. I can handle 1v5s. Cmon, show me what ya got.

It's 4 in the morning, why are you doing this...

 

[meijak]

He’s sleeping. Leave him be. I’ll be filling in for his place. I can handle 1v5s. Cmon, show me what ya got.

What is blud yapping about?

 

[dino]

Kek I love how schlogtrannies always have to 1v5 a mudshit

i mean, there arent many mudshits in here, do you expect islamophobes to defend you?

and still lose

substantiate that

I’m gonna have fun archiving these threads and posting them to the Booruteens to make fun of you

geg hes leaking

 

[Gigafly]

No you didn’t? We’re talking about the direct source you just stated and I’ve already given two examples on how they reaffirm that Hadith as another premise lmao.

I purchased a cushion with pictures on it. The Prophet (came and) stood at the door but did not enter. I said (to him), "I repent to Allah for what (the guilt) I have done." He said, "What is this cushion?" I said, "It is for you to sit on and recline on." He said, "The makers of these pictures will be punished on the Day of Resurrection and it will be said to them, 'Make alive what you have created.' Moreover, the angels do not enter a house where there are pictures.'"

Sahih al-Bukhari 5957
Book 77, Hadith 173

Are you refuting the word of Aisha?

 

[Warrior-Z]

It's 4 in the morning, why are you doing this...

Because I am BATMAN.

i mean, there arent many mudshits in here, do you expect islamophobes to defend you?

Erm, no. That’s not what I said either.

substantiate that

Yeah, that’s axiomatic.

geg hes leaking

Prove that.

What is blud yapping about?

Cmon, bitch, can’t fight without your cordbuddies? Not surprised.

 

[Warrior-Z]

Sahih al-Bukhari 5957
Book 77, Hadith 173

Are you refuting the word of Aisha?

No, I’m using the other authorities and words that reinstate what she said in another premise that actually give it more substantiation so that’s not what I’m saying you can go ahead and track the conversation.

 

[Gemerald]

>Warrior-Z refuting the word of Aisha
You're gonna get beheaded lil bro